Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.
Comments
238,921 - 238,940 of 305,181 Comments Last updated 4 hrs ago

Since: Nov 10

Breckenridge Colorado

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253905
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>That show Toddlers and Tiara's is child porn/abuse. DISGUSTING that women today,who fought so long to become "equal" would degrade their daughters like this. I forsee these young girls becoming prostitutes,skanks and strippers because of their selfish moms.
I did watch the honeybooboo show once. Look at that family. NUFF said.
Gross.
Did you see in the news that the father of one of those little girls is fighting for sole custudy and may get it? watch that show go off the air real soon. Also they have Honey on video at a bar that college kids go to dancing. Disgusting. somehow the producers felt sorry for the family and filmed a few episodes to give them a handout . One show I do like is the Hutterites .
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253906
Aug 22, 2012
 
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm very familiar with THMs. We aren't vulnerable to them because the chlorine doesn't come in contact with "organic matter" in our groundwater. This is a concern for places that get their water from surface water supplies - like the Mississippi or Colorado Rivers. Simply put, they have things like dead animals and poop in them, which groundwater doesn't. So THMs don't have a chance to form in our water before we drink it. Also: your water supplier tests for them, anyway, just to be safe.
This was a very good question, JM.
Interesting! I know that I through alot at you with this. I just wanted to post it all. Thanks for responding and your input.
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253907
Aug 22, 2012
 
*threw*
zef

Hemet, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253908
Aug 22, 2012
 
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know any proaborts, either here or elsewhere. Perhaps you get "in trouble" because you are not willing to admit to your own?
Just speculation. Could be wrong.
Its first recommendation on "what women need to know" instructs health professionals: "Women should be advised that abortion is generally safer than continuing a pregnancy to term."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/...

British Doctors Told to Advise Women Abortion Safer Than Giving Birth

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/02/27/advis...

Abortion safer than giving birth: study

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-...
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253909
Aug 22, 2012
 
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I 'expect' that sort of thing from no one. Expectations are usually met. I prefer, even though I'm often disappointed, to 'expect' that everyone will exercise their intellect with more vigor than their emotions, in hopes that those expectations will be met eventually.
JMO
May I show you to the nearest exit? You're obviously lost.

LOL

Funny thing though is that your posts,since you 'arrived',have been nothing BUT emotionally driven nonsense. If you dish out,then expect it back hypocrite.
zef

Hemet, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253910
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>So you're against reproductive choice of any kind, if it's not a choice you'd make.
Got it.
By the way, pregnancy being a 'natural state' of women, is a very common precept within the 'pro-life' community - just not a well supported one. I see you're not departing from the party line: If you're pre-born, you're fine....if you're post-born, you're fuct.
That about sum it up?
No one is allowed to kill pregnant mothers, nor ever has been. Your incessant nihilistic hatemongering sickens me.
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253911
Aug 22, 2012
 
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>So you're against reproductive choice of any kind, if it's not a choice you'd make.
Got it.
By the way, pregnancy being a 'natural state' of women, is a very common precept within the 'pro-life' community - just not a well supported one. I see you're not departing from the party line: If you're pre-born, you're fine....if you're post-born, you're fuct.
That about sum it up?
You said that that psycho "practices what I preach". I'd like you to explain this "emotional" comment from you.

I am a woman. I don't want anyone telling me what to do. America the great,does in fact tell me what to do though ;/ but I LOVE living here. Good news: America doesn't FORCE me to get pregnant. Nor does it force ANY woman to get pregnant.

"""By the way, pregnancy being a 'natural state' of women"""

Honey,your space ship is about to take off. Best get yer thangs and head on....

LOL
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253912
Aug 22, 2012
 
lost-cause wrote:
<quoted text>
Not the same scenerio...
Oh? Explain please.

Chance of baby dying(miscarriage) in both scenerios.

Dr's afraid treatment to save this girls life will cause miscarriage.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253913
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>I've yet to see a reply to my comments about another scenerio involving that very same woman.
Here it is again...
If that very same woman didn't have cancer,but was pregnant,and got into a car accident,would those very same Dr's have done EMERGENCY surgery to save her life? Would they be thinking that they'd be accused of aborting her child "if" and that is "if" that baby was miscarried?
You know the answer as well as I. This then proves my point.
Yes, what if she had extensive injuries to her abdomen and her uterus had to be removed even though she was pregnant. Makes you wonder if they would be reluctant.
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253914
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lady_Venus wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously, you need your head examined!
I’m sure you’re the woman on the jury judging the poor soul that was rapped and ended up pregnant.
People like you are the reason that over 80% of rapes go unreported!
You certainly do not live in reality Miss!
Rapped?

@@

Who sits on a jury and judges "rapped" poor souls?

Nope,PP is the reason why "rappes" go unreported. Proaborts like you are the reason why they go unreported. You have been known to mock YOUNG girls that were abused and/or accuse rape victims of screaming rape to cover up their "sluttiness".
zef

Hemet, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253915
Aug 22, 2012
 
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Since your 'solution' is maiming innocent women, I fail to see the difference. Of course mine is a pro-choice point of view. I have yet to claim otherwise.
Not that your opinion on the matter, has any bearing whatsoever, on whether or not I choose to gestate.
If your opinion had no bearing on whether or not I choose to use drugs, you might have a point. But since it does, you obviously don't. Women that kill their children with an abortion are not innocent, not in the least.

“Nasty Nana”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253916
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>So you are blaming men for your pregnancy? You are raped every time that you have sex? You've NEVER had control over who you sleep with? You've NEVER had control over telling a man NO when you didn't want to get pregnant?
C'mon,don't make ALL women as pathetic as you are.
I for one,have control over MY life. "If" I get pregnant,then it is because I CHOSE to have sex when fertile. Pregnancy is a natural result of intercourse.
You are utterly incapable of reading a single post without injecting what you think is being said. Yet again you have totally twisted her words to make yet another endless, offensive rant.
Perhaps you are unaware of the theory that if we were not meant to enjoy and further more indulge in intercourse, the “Lord” would not have made it feel, oh, so, good!
The option not to conceive by use of contraceptive has been practiced and perfected since the 18 century, frankly, it should be encouraged.
The implications of your agreement suggest that you agree with baby making machines and government reliance, though that seems to totally turn your religious right argument on it’s head.
Are you a supporter of the Death Penalty?
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253917
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lady_Venus wrote:
<quoted text>
48% of American woman will have AT LEAST one abortion in her lifetime. Appears to me it’s the Pro-Lifers that are completely incapable of practicing what you preach, also.
It is also you hypocritical reprobates that set up girls for such failures. You unsuccessfully teach abstinence, which is utterly ineffective. Take the Netherlands for example, where sexual education is a top priority. This country not only has the lowest teenage pregnancy rate in all of Europe, shockingly they have the lowest STD/STI rates in all of Europe.
I do not think that America practices preventive medicine at all, though, the medical industry seems to disagree. Sadly, healthcare has been monopolized by the insurance companies.
{{OMG, SHUT UP, something we agree on.}}
""""Appear s to me it’s the Pro-Lifers that are completely incapable of practicing what you preach, also.""""

If you kill your child,you're not prolife. You were pro-death.

""""You unsuccessfully teach abstinence""" "

Liar.

You teach conception,yet over...that's OVER 50% of women who received abortions,were using it. Not as "successful" as you'd like to presume. That's also not including the girls who lied to their Dr's and told them that they DID use it because they felt silly. This ALSO doesn't include all the ones that DIDN'T abort(that got pregnant while using contraception)and went on to give birth.

Yeah,EPIC FAIL dear.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253918
Aug 22, 2012
 
sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>So you are blaming men for your pregnancy?
I place no 'blame' on either party for pregnancy. I also place responsibility for born children on both parties. What I advocate is that the woman have the final say on whether or not she gestates - and even that is uncertain, given the fact of miscarriage.

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>You are raped every time that you have sex?
No. I've never been raped.

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>You've NEVER had control over who you sleep with?
I've always had control over with whom I have sex. I've never had complete control over whether or not I become pregnant, and neither does anyone sexually active, with working reproductive organs.

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>You've NEVER had control over telling a man NO when you didn't want to get pregnant?
As I've said, I've never been raped. I have, however, been pregnant, and there have been many outcomes of my choice to gestate. Not all of them resulted in live birth. Not all of my pregnancies were allowed to gestate. I have two beautiful children, whom I raised to adulthood.
sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>C'mon,don't make ALL women as pathetic as you are.
I am incapable of 'making' any or 'all' women do, or appear to be, anything at all. Why would you assert that I've tried to?
sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>I for one,have control over MY life.
And apparently you'd like the law to exercise reproductive control over everyone else's.

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text>"If" I get pregnant,then it is because I CHOSE to have sex when fertile.
And if you don't get pregnant, is that a result of your control over reproduction, or not? Careful - there's more than one answer.
sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text> Pregnancy is a natural result of intercourse.
Which is the exact opposite of what you said earlier - that Suleman's serial pregnancies were 'not natural'. I'd like to see you try and convince the Duggars, for example, of your stance on this.
zef

Hemet, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253919
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lady_Venus wrote:
<quoted text>
You are utterly incapable of reading a single post without injecting what you think is being said. Yet again you have totally twisted her words to make yet another endless, offensive rant.
Perhaps you are unaware of the theory that if we were not meant to enjoy and further more indulge in intercourse, the “Lord” would not have made it feel, oh, so, good!
The option not to conceive by use of contraceptive has been practiced and perfected since the 18 century, frankly, it should be encouraged.
The implications of your agreement suggest that you agree with baby making machines and government reliance, though that seems to totally turn your religious right argument on it’s head.
Are you a supporter of the Death Penalty?
I am opposed to the death penalty for people that have never committed, nor been convicted of any crime.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253920
Aug 22, 2012
 
zef wrote:
<quoted text>
Its first recommendation on "what women need to know" instructs health professionals: "Women should be advised that abortion is generally safer than continuing a pregnancy to term."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/...
British Doctors Told to Advise Women Abortion Safer Than Giving Birth
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/02/27/advis...
Abortion safer than giving birth: study
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-...
So far, you've bolstered my stance on abortion. Might you have a point to make, otherwise?
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253921
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lady_Venus wrote:
<quoted text>
You are utterly incapable of reading a single post without injecting what you think is being said. Yet again you have totally twisted her words to make yet another endless, offensive rant.
Perhaps you are unaware of the theory that if we were not meant to enjoy and further more indulge in intercourse, the “Lord” would not have made it feel, oh, so, good!
The option not to conceive by use of contraceptive has been practiced and perfected since the 18 century, frankly, it should be encouraged.
The implications of your agreement suggest that you agree with baby making machines and government reliance, though that seems to totally turn your religious right argument on it’s head.
Are you a supporter of the Death Penalty?
""""Perhap s you are unaware of the theory that if we were not meant to enjoy and further more indulge in intercourse, the “Lord” would not have made it feel, oh, so, good"""" ""

Having sex with 5 guys must feel "OH,SO,GOOD" too.
Having sex with the hot mailman must feel "OH,SO,GOOD" too.
Smoking crack must feel "OH,SO,GOOD"too or nobody would be doing it.
Dancing on tables while piss drunk must feel "OH,SO,GOOD" too since many women like to do that when drunk.

OR...the "Lord" would not have made it feel "OH,SO,GOOD".

But,just the same...yes,he did make sex feel oh so good because he wanted us to have it in order to procreate. If I have cancer,I'm sure sex will feel just as AWESOME as if I didn't have it,but realistically,I would ABSTAIN for obvious reasons.

You EXPECT to teach young kids,teenagers to stay clean,sexfree if they think drinking,sex,drugs "feel oh so good"? I bet you wouldn't give a damn WHAT it felt like if you were the mom.

Siiiiiit down punk.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253922
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you serious? You think women in this country are in danger of not be treated with chemo for cancer because they are pregnant?
Who is advocating for that?
C'mom.
Anyone who is advocating for abortion to be entirely illegal. Pay attention, Witless.

“Nasty Nana”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253923
Aug 22, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

sassy Jm wrote:
<quoted text> Rapped?
@@
Who sits on a jury and judges "rapped" poor souls?
Nope,PP is the reason why "rappes" go unreported. Proaborts like you are the reason why they go unreported. You have been known to mock YOUNG girls that were abused and/or accuse rape victims of screaming rape to cover up their "sluttiness".
Yet again you show your utter ignorance.
Firstly, I have never and will never mocked REAL victims of abuse. I passed comment about a silly little girl posting her dirty laundry as if she would get sympathy. News flash sister, real trauma victims do not talk to total strangers about their abuse. I have little time for silly little girls that cry wolf.
Are you seriously insinuating that Pro Choice supports are the reason rape goes unreported, really!?! Please enlighten me how you came to that synopsis! I cannot fathom how one comes to that conclusion.
Perhaps you should have better worded your own retort, panties are in enough of a wade for you to imply that your little friend indeed cried wolf.
Wrong again Sassy, on all accounts, having a bad day sister?
sassy Jm

Jackson, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253924
Aug 22, 2012
 
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know any proaborts, either here or elsewhere. Perhaps you get "in trouble" because you are not willing to admit to your own?
Just speculation. Could be wrong.
Do you support a womans right to abort if that's what she chooses?

Nope,never would even conceive of killing my child let alone actually doing it. It would never cross my mind. Sorry,but not all people are anti-life,pro-death.

WORST case scenerio,I'd give my child up for adoption IF the occassion arrived where I was unable to feed or house my child. God forbid. I'm not for abortion nor do I support the Susan Smiths of the world who kill their born unwanted children either.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••