Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Comments (Page 11,632)

Showing posts 232,621 - 232,640 of303,328
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“The one who knows”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247037
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
I don't know of anyone RC has reported; that's blueboy's scam.
<quoted text>
Ya know, that's been alleged by more than one person around here, but nobody seems to be able to substantiate it.
grumpy

Pomona, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247038
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Chicky, if you told me John Doe murdered Jane Smith, I wouldn't question faith; I'd question why you're saying that.
<quoted text>
But, I'm not making that statement Chicky. It was you who stated "there is no god." I only stated you can't prove, or disprove that statement, so I'm justified to say the opposite as you are to make your statement.
If I told you that Energy cannot be created or destroyed; would you believe it, or ask for proof?
<quoted text>
There is also no way to disprove it, so again, I'm justified in making the factual statement to the opposite of yours and will have no need to prove it, because you can't prove there is no G-d either.
<quoted text>
Wrong. Until someone can prove there is no G-d, or disprove that there G-d exists, I can positively claim G-d exists.
<quoted text>
It doesn't bother me at all. We can agree to disagree on this subject.
Because scientific law is proven by statistical evidence, intelligent design must have been overwhelming proven by our intelligent understanding of nature.

“The one who knows”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247039
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
Chickensh!t is just mad because she's been banned more than anyone else.
I've been banned too. Difference between me and her, or me and moonie, is that when I'm banned, it's like proof of a job well-done. When they get banned, it's like this big injustice or something.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247040
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
He doesn't have to control her. She is a troll. She gets off on the disruption just like he does. She reports for the hell of it. It's a GAME.
What's the difference? A troll is a troll.
The difference is that RC laughs at herself as much as she laughs at everyone else, if not more. He takes himself seriously.

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247041
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rach has NEVER been secretive in her reason for being here that I know of, and I've known her now for almost what, 5 or 6 years Rach?
We get it. You dont like her. Many dont, but you're choosing the wrong thread to continue your not-so-silent war with her, as many of us do hold her in high regard, myself included. From much of what you've said, I'd say you're basing your opinion OF her on her admitted trolling, but SOME of us know her better.
Quit suckin up already.

Who are YOU "miss Ive been stalking,attacking and harrassing Lynne for six years-NON STOP" of ALL people to tell another that they shouldnt be at war with someone on here..? Who CARES who YOU hold in high regard @@

Next.......

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247042
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Which PC "pinheads?" Have you graduated to pinheads from boneheads?
<quoted text>
Why are you arguing this with me?
<quoted text>
There are some definitions, and terms that require all that's applicable to that definition, or term, to be stated. The opposite is also true; if a definition, or term does not require a particular qualifier, such must be stated. Example; if a Judge dismisses a case, pursuant to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and it is the Judge's intention to allow the Plaintiff to re-file the lawsuit, the Judge must state "without prejudice." To not state "without prejudice," will mean the suit is dismissed WITH Prejudice, and the Plaintiff would be barred from EVER re-filing the lawsuit.
This principle applies to viability as well. And here's why; the reasonable presumption is that if viability is being questioned, a severely premature new born is the subject of the matter. Before any medical assistance is applied, the preemie must demonstrate its ability to live is 50% or greater. Medical tests and experts' estimations are used for that "demonstration" to take place. So, for a severely premature newborn to be considered viable, it must, on its own, demonstrate it can live outside the womb WITHOUT ASSISTANCE. If medical assistance helps developt the preemie to achieve full maturity, which more often than not happens to be the case, then it will be applied. So, if the definition comes from a medical source, and does not include medical assistance as a qualifier, who are you, or Doc, to say medical assistance is a part of viability. Because by arguing the definition does not explicitly prohibit it, youre being inapposite.
<quoted text>
Intelligent people do not argue with those who know more on any given subject than they do. You're not a doctor, so your argument on viability is obtuse at best, plain ole dumb at worse.
Thank goodness Lily doesn't actually do anything outside of her home, because she's one of those people who thinks she doesn't actually need to learn anything to be an expert. I could see her putting an "MD" after her name and trying to practice medicine, fraudulently. She's an arrogant ass.

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247043
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

bluestreak prime wrote:
<quoted text>
And I say again: Wow, buddy, you sound mad. Just remember, you got off into that Irving shit, pushing a boundary, I just took the ball and ran with it a bit.
Hey blue :)

Yeah, foo is like a rabid dog. She lacks any resemblance of self-control. She comes on here to people please anyone who will have her. The rest whom she cant manipulate, get her wrath. She's a sad soul really.

She escorts babys to their death INSTEAD Of actually helping needy and poor women have a chance at keeping their babies. She also ridicules abused women.

She's a mess.

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247044
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I totally agree with you. When she first started posting to me it was an off-the-wall strange kind of rambling that I ignored so she sent me a private message and was shrieking out demands that I respond to her. Now RC is avidly defending someone who came here and wrote anti-semitic slurs.
Foo, lala and chicky avidly defend nasty nana who wrote racial slurs against her own daughter and grandchildren. At first they themselves called her a racist btw...UNTIL she went proabort. Lala also blantantly wrote racist slurs against a poster here UNTIL she found out that CD was of the same race.

So......you're on your own here sweetie.

((Getting my popcorn ready for the proaborts to DENY it)))

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247045
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

R C Honey wrote:
<quoted text>I've reported you,, sue me! HAHAHAHHA
Go ahead and deny that you didn't me! Hypocrite....
How many of your posts are you just flinging crap? Ahhh Chicklette,, I think your comments to suit your agenda is flippin adorable, keep up the good work/denial!
Don't you DARE accuse any proabort of reporting people.

They don't do that. I SWEAR they don't.

No really.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247046
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SassyJM wrote:
<quoted text> Foo, lala and chicky avidly defend nasty nana who wrote racial slurs against her own daughter and grandchildren. At first they themselves called her a racist btw...UNTIL she went proabort. Lala also blantantly wrote racist slurs against a poster here UNTIL she found out that CD was of the same race.
So......you're on your own here sweetie.
((Getting my popcorn ready for the proaborts to DENY it)))
You keep bringing this up so how exactly did this woman write racial slurs against her own children and grandchildren? What I heard told about it was she said it's hard to raise biracial children in the South. How is that writing racial slurs? Sounds like she was just stating reality.

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247047
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then there was the time she was on here shrieking f bombs and demanding to be banned. What is so witty and funny about that kind of strange behavior? What am I missing? I don't know.
You're a bore? You take life on an anonymous forum too seriously? Hey listen, when abortion is beijg discussed...then yeah...be serious but otherwise...I mean, lighten up francis. Sheesh.

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247048
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep bringing this up so how exactly did this woman write racial slurs against her own children and grandchildren? What I heard told about it was she said it's hard to raise biracial children in the South. How is that writing racial slurs? Sounds like she was just stating reality.
Who said she said that?

First of all, she isn't IN the south.

Ask your friends here. THEY called her a "filthy racist" for months. In fact,Michelle even told her that she would have been better off aborting then to have a Grandma like her.

Ask them......go on....I want to see them deny it.

What about lalas racist remarks about "dirty filthy latinos" ?

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247049
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, RC! I remember conversations where you said your avatars were Cyndi Lauper and that YOU resembled Crystal Bernard. But whatever... And how is Leslie these days?
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004751/
:p
That is not Cyndi Lauper on her avatar. You DO know what Cyndi looks like right?

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247050
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

'
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
What I find mind boggling and stupefying is that one troll is bad and evil, yet the other troll, who plays the exact same bait and report games is A-ok. One poster that lies about who she is and posts under different ids is to be hounded and ridiculed BUT another just like her isn't
Pathetic double standard.
LOL right? It's ALL about double standards isn't it?!?!

Hypocritical double standards.

You go girl!

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247052
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Now "there's" my gal in her sunglasses.
Absolutely "love" that avatar "Rachel!"
For reasons I can't fully explain, I find that photo...fascinating.
::::::YIKES::::::::

Oh noooo you DIDN'T !

Someone sound the alarm when sunshine sees this.

You're in BIG trouble now, Mister

hahaha

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247055
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I actually care very much about the innocent being killed. I also care very much about idiots that think its fun to "bust on" gays, and drive so many of our kids to suicide while murdering others.
<quoted text>
Except I do NOT "advocate" abortion at all, in ANY way shape or form for ANY reason.
Why do you feel a need to outright LIE all the time Skankdawg?
<quoted text>Yes he is. Nice to see you agree.
You not only support and advocate killing humans in the womb wyou also escort them to their deaths.

You LIVE on here defending and justifying killing as choice.

“Don't kill me mom”

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247056
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! !!!
JUST when you think the Skank cant POSSIBLY get any stupider!!!
Maybe you were asleep in Geography class too, huh Skanky? Last I heard, Florida had PLENTY of land. ROFLMAO!
The saying is "swamp land" you moron. LOLOLOLOL!! And you have the audacity to accuse OTHERS of NOT using their brains?
Of course, if you had one, you'd take it out and play with it. LOL!
No dear wthe saying is Land in florisa and the JOKE is that it ends up swamp land. DUH!!!

Believe me,.....people fall for it everyday. Im there to bail them out.

Lol

“The one who knows”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247057
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

SassyJM wrote:
'<quoted text> LOL right? It's ALL about double standards isn't it?!?!
Hypocritical double standards.
You go girl!
I find it funny how she tries to get me to change my rules of engagement when she finds herself losing. Funnier than crap!
STO

Vallejo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247058
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
You're welcome dumbbell. It only took so long because you have a real problem asking clear direct questions.
You can't say stuff like I believe that an embryo is viable with future OR current medical technology and expect to be taken seriously.
<quoted text>
I'm glad. So you agree that chicky's assertion that an otherwise healthy preemie born at 34 weeks that might need some temporary artificial assistance to breathe is NON VIABLE...is absurd ?
<quoted text>
YOU took it to the point of absurdity.....not me. You lead me down that path knowing what the answer to the question technically had to be given the definition of the term.
<quoted text>
I happen to think that the concept of an embryo being viable is over the top as well. Your beef is with the definition.....not me.
You lost. Don't be a poor sport.

You wanna argue the word "viability" as it was used in Roe could include embryos. That's dumb. You know it. I exposed it.

You can blur all the definitons of viability you want. Won't change the fact an embryo is not physiologically viable, no matter where it develops.
STO

Vallejo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247059
Jul 3, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Already answered.
Go look for it.
Don't be askeerd.
Ya know it's interesting how you can be away from this dopey forum for weeks at a time yet when you come back you pick right up where you left off with my posts. You scroll back 1000+ posts and know right where to find mine. yet you couldn't do the same when it comes to my answer to your stupid illegal abortion question.
Why is that ?
This'll be 32x I'm challenging, and I'm bettin' it will be 32x you dodge.

If you had an explanation, you'd have posted it by now. Twice, if what you say is true.

Explain how a state sanctioned abortion, obtained with explicit permission by the state due to a specific exception, and provided for by a licensed medical professional is illegal.
**********

Should be a simple short explanation, Doc.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 232,621 - 232,640 of303,328
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••