Scores die in wave of attacks in Afghanistan

Judged:

2

2

1

obamas lost war wrote:

MODIFIED COPY FROM THE THREAD THEY PULLED. Big mouth obama has promised to pull U.S. forces out of Iraq and concentrate on bin Laden and Afghanistan. He will have his hands full. Bin Laden is daring obama to a full time war. Bin Laden finally realized that he could not defeat George Bush in Iraq and al Qaeda has pulled out in defeat. The battleground now is Afgahanistan and obama has bitten off more than he can chew. With no military experience and no stomach for war and his own supporters being anti war, obama will have a screaming liberal revolt on his hands. The conservatives will say "We told you so" and obama will falter his first year in office. obama will be the biggest failure since jimmy carter. What's obama's story going to be when he has to face reality? North Korea will be the next country to challenge obama and Iran will be right behind. The liberals will demand that obama stop the genocide in Darfur and the conservatives will say no way. Say good bye to obama's social programs and his domestic policy. He'll be too busy with world affairs that will crumble around him as the have nots demand a handout.

Judged:

2

1

Herodotus wrote:

Has Bush accomplished *anything* in 8 years ?
He will have to fire the guy in charge of the Afghanistan occupation, and put in someone more 'loyal'. That's his answer to everything, that and tax cuts for the richest 0.1%.
Bush's Post-it note on his bicycle:
"Cut taxes, borrow more from China, spend more on military stuff.
Repeat.
Oh, and talk to Bandar about gas prices at the next BBQ."

Judged:

1

1

1

jimmy obama wrote:

<quoted text>obama will be the puppet of Pelosi and Reid. They know 50 times more about government than obama does. They will demand that he sign their legislation in the interest of party unity. obama will be as weak as jimmy carter who bent over for the Democratic Congress for four years and ruined the entire country in the process. It took years to recover from carter and company. People today don't know what economic collapse really is. These are the good times compared to carter's fiasco. carter will likely become an obama advisor.

Moiz Qidwai wrote:

<quoted text>
Solution to all US problems seem to be (as you would like us to blieve):
-Ban Democtratic Party
-Appoint GWB / Cheney as President / VP for life!!(there's or USA 's, which ever comes first)!!!
- Make USA One party state (just like Communists)
- Make Israel as one state of USA (You get permanent foot in ME and permanent hand in Oil Till)

Waldo wrote:

<quoted text>
You make too much sense and have too many facts. They are gonna hate that. Most just want to rant and rave and spread fear and hatred. But I want to thank you for your information.

jimmy obama wrote:

<quoted text>obama will be the puppet of Pelosi and Reid. They know 50 times more about government than obama does. They will demand that he sign their legislation in the interest of party unity. obama will be as weak as jimmy carter who bent over for the Democratic Congress for four years and ruined the entire country in the process. It took years to recover from carter and company. People today don't know what economic collapse really is. These are the good times compared to carter's fiasco. carter will likely become an obama advisor.

Judged:

1

rumors of wars wrote:

<quoted text>America had the strongest economy and the highest stock market in history until the Democrats got elected to a majority in Congress in 2006. Gas was $2 a gallon until the Democrats started running the show.
Now the Democrats are promising a concentration of military effort in Afghanistan and considering sending troops to Darfur.

Fresh Look wrote:

<quoted text> Alliances are fluid by nature. The USA and the USSR were allies in WWII in 1945 and enemies in 1946. Yes, the USA helped the Taliban defeat the Soviet invasion because we shared a common enemy. Are you under the impression that allegiances should never change?

rumors of wars wrote:

<quoted text>America had the strongest economy and the highest stock market in history until the Democrats got elected to a majority in Congress in 2006. Gas was $2 a gallon until the Democrats started running the show.
Now the Democrats are promising a concentration of military effort in Afghanistan and considering sending troops to Darfur.

Judged:

1

USA pull out wrote:

<quoted text>
Alliances are fluid by nature... HMM interesting.
Lets just imagine that Russia by now sees USA like a threat and why shouldn't they? You are building rocket launching sights on their doorsteps. You have more than 700 military bases all around the world (this is only outside US), you are supporting anybody that opposes the Russian government and through Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc. you are their main competitors for supplying the oil to Europe and China.
They probably see you like you saw Communism all those years ago. A threat.
So how would you feel, if they went to Afghanistan or even Iraq and they trained, armed and financed every man who wanted to fight you. This is just what US did back than in Afghanistan. And they certainly ow you a favor like this.Many young Russian men died in Afghanistan than and you were the one made it all possible.

mr mojo risin wrote:

time to send re-enforcements over to afghanistan......how about all these neocon hawks we got over here who love this war so much......lets ship bush ,cheney,mccain,rice,limbaugh,g lenn beck,oreilly,sean hannity to afghanistan and see how much these windbags really like war.
Oh wait Im sure all these people are too chickensh!t to go so they'll just stay here and figure out a way they can blame obama and pelosi for this mess in afghanistan.

Judged:

1

1

Bob53 wrote:

<quoted text>
The Democrats did not take office until January, 2007.
And you attempt to pin the results of six years of GOP control of the government and its economic policies to us.
Get real. By the time our party came in, the damage was done.

Judged:

1

Waldo wrote:

<quoted text>
In any case, Dem or Repub, Afghanistan can't be "won" by anybody. They never have and never will. The best you can hope for is some kind of stability for the short term.

Judged:

1

1

1

Bob53 wrote:

<quoted text>
Carter inherited high inflation and unemployment from Ford.
The oil embargo of 1979 further impacted the U.S. economy.
Keep making stuff up, Jumbo.

Fresh Look wrote:

<quoted text> With all due respect to the Russian men who died in Afghanistan, are you forgetting all the young American men who died in Vietnam due to Soviet arms? Our presidential candidate, John McCain was SHOT DOWN by a Soviet made SAM missile. Ain't payback a bit*h?

MR AL wrote:

Who cares! This is not about Russia or how the Taliban came to power. This is about getting OSAMA BIN LADEN. Let's not forget that over 4000 US civilians died on 911. This about my brothers in arms who fought bravely and just paid the ultimate price. Those were brave soldiers and for those that have never experience combat, things are different when bullets fly by your head and watching your fellow soldiers die. Things change in combat. This is about the brave soldiers who paid a price to GET THAT MURDERER OSAMA.

Judged:

1

Somali spokesman wrote:

<quoted text>
you will never get osama. only more american soldiers will get killed by the taliban warriors.