Give 'em hell, Mitt: fight Obama's smears

Judged:

1

1

1

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>you made the claim cupcake.......let's see you prove it......
United StatesSeptember 2008 – 280,000 jobs lost
October 2008 – 240,000 jobs lost
November 2008 – 333,000 jobs lost
December 2008 – 632,000 jobs lost[2]
January 2009 – 741,000 jobs lost
February 2009 – 681,000 jobs lost
March 2009 – 652,000 jobs lost
April 2009 – 519,000 jobs lost
May 2009 – 303,000 jobs lost
June 2009 – 463,000 jobs lost
July 2009 – 276,000 jobs lost
August 2009 – 201,000 jobs lost
September 2009 – 263,000 jobs lost
October 2009 – 111,000 jobs lost[3]
November 2009 - 64,000 jobs created[4]
December 2009 - 109,000 jobs lost[4]
January 2010 - 14,000 jobs created[4]
February 2010 - 39,000 jobs created
March 2010 - 208,000 jobs created
April 2010 - 290,000 jobs created
May 2010 - 413,000 jobs created
June 2010 - 125,000 jobs lost
July 2010 - 131,000 jobs lost (143,000 Federal Census jobs lost)[5]
August 2010 - 54,000 jobs lost
September 2010 - 95,000 jobs lost (According to U.S. Labor Department, 64,000 private sector jobs are added but a net loss of 95,000 jobs are due to government layoffs)[6][7]
October 2010 - 159,000 gained (Private sector jobs net increase)
November 2010 - 93,000 gained
December 2010 - 121,000 gained
January 2011 - 68,000 gained
February 2011 - 235,000 gained
March 2011 - 221,000 gained
April 2011 - 244,000 gained
2008 (September 2008 – December 2008)– 2.6 million jobs lost
2009 (January 2009 – December 2009)– 4.2 million jobs lost[8]
2010 (January 2010-December 2010)- 863,000 jobs created
Note: Job losses in June and July 2010 are largely attributed to US census worker jobs lost. Private sector jobs have increased during those months.
Current unemployment rate (as of January 2011): 8.5% U3 numbers, 15% U6 numbers.
Since the start of the recession, 8.5 million jobs have been lost, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.[9]
Obama is still 2 million behind..........no net jobs........call us when he gets his first..........tell him though he better hurry.

Judged:

1

1

1

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
He was Governor of Massachusetts and the are a VERY Democratic State ao with a Republican House and a Democratic Senate Mitt should have no ptoblem with Congress.
I am not familiar with any pledge of not raising taxes that Mitt made BUT there is TRILLIONS in fraud and waste and greed and corruption in Government that can and MUST be eliminated before taxes are put on the table.

Judged:

1

1

1

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>you made the claim cupcake.......let's see you prove it......

United StatesSeptember 2008 – 280,000 jobs lost
October 2008 – 240,000 jobs lost
November 2008 – 333,000 jobs lost
December 2008 – 632,000 jobs lost[2]
January 2009 – 741,000 jobs lost
February 2009 – 681,000 jobs lost
March 2009 – 652,000 jobs lost
April 2009 – 519,000 jobs lost
May 2009 – 303,000 jobs lost
June 2009 – 463,000 jobs lost
July 2009 – 276,000 jobs lost
August 2009 – 201,000 jobs lost
September 2009 – 263,000 jobs lost
October 2009 – 111,000 jobs lost[3]
November 2009 - 64,000 jobs created[4]
December 2009 - 109,000 jobs lost[4]
January 2010 - 14,000 jobs created[4]
February 2010 - 39,000 jobs created
March 2010 - 208,000 jobs created
April 2010 - 290,000 jobs created
May 2010 - 413,000 jobs created
June 2010 - 125,000 jobs lost
July 2010 - 131,000 jobs lost (143,000 Federal Census jobs lost)[5]
August 2010 - 54,000 jobs lost
September 2010 - 95,000 jobs lost (According to U.S. Labor Department, 64,000 private sector jobs are added but a net loss of 95,000 jobs are due to government layoffs)[6][7]
October 2010 - 159,000 gained (Private sector jobs net increase)
November 2010 - 93,000 gained
December 2010 - 121,000 gained
January 2011 - 68,000 gained
February 2011 - 235,000 gained
March 2011 - 221,000 gained
April 2011 - 244,000 gained
2008 (September 2008 – December 2008)– 2.6 million jobs lost
2009 (January 2009 – December 2009)– 4.2 million jobs lost[8]
2010 (January 2010-December 2010)- 863,000 jobs created
Note: Job losses in June and July 2010 are largely attributed to US census worker jobs lost. Private sector jobs have increased during those months.

Current unemployment rate (as of January 2011): 8.5% U3 numbers, 15% U6 numbers.

Since the start of the recession, 8.5 million jobs have been lost, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.[9]

Obama is still 2 million behind..........no net jobs........call us when he gets his first..........tell him though he better hurry.

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>I agree there is TRILLIONS in fraud and waste and greed and corruption in the Federal Government that can and MUST be eliminated before taxes are put on the table but politicians already know the language in the 16th amendment.

Judged:

1

1

1

rwtaylor56 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're giving Obama credit for 4,000,000 jobs lost prior to May of '09, which was at least that time before any of his policies could take effect??? Wow! That's really fair-minded of you. Dipshit.

Judged:

1

1

1

Just Think wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, since I'm not voting for either Romney or Obama, I'm not exactly sure how I qualify for sheeple status...but whatever.
Regarding his 59 point plan - I've looked at it. I noticed it doesn't state which goverment agencies he's going to close - even though he's said he will close some. It doesn't say which tax loopholes he's going to eliminate - even though he's said he'll eliminate some. It doesn't say if he'll repeal Obama's recent nightmare of Immigration "reform" - even though he's said he doesn't like the policy.
Obama sucks and Romney doesn't have the balls to be President.
...and we're all screwed.

Judged:

1

1

1

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>There is great confusuion in this political debate due to the SUBTERFUGE of the neo-Cons, of which the Bush family is front and center. In reality, the neo-Cons are basically Rockefeller Republicans posing as Conservatives, ie. Bush, Rumsfeld, McCain, Cheney, Linsey Grahm, etc.

Of course, the Rockefellers are FAR BIGGER that to be pigenholed into a political party of a country, as they are GLOBALISTS thru and thru. Obama too. is in their GLOBALIST sphere and does their bidding.

The QUESTION is; where does Romney fit in. To me, he is a chameleon----but he seems to be drifting in the direction of Paul Ryan AND Ron Paul(Audit the Fed--Internet Freedom).

He is FAR Smarter than Bush and we have to hope he has some independence from the GLOBALIST POWER structure!

If not, then, as you said, "we're all screwed".

Judged:

1

1

1

Vance1 wrote:

Hopefully Ron Paul supports will vote Romney/Ryan and that will cancel out the blk vote for the Obama.
‘debt, doubt and decline’= the last 4 yrs of the Obama economy
its alright not to vote for socialism/obama
its ok to vote to give your children/grandchildren to have a good future

Judged:

1

1

1

rwtaylor56 wrote:

<quoted text>
Every politician who's ever run for office on the past century has campaigned on waste, fraud and abuse but apparently never finds any. Retard.

Judged:

2

1

1

Vance1 wrote:

Hopefully Ron Paul supports will vote Romney/Ryan and that will cancel out the blk vote for the Obama.
‘debt, doubt and decline’= the last 4 yrs of the Obama economy
its alright not to vote for socialism/obama
its ok to vote to give your children/grandchildren to have a good future

Judged:

1

1

1

Imhotep wrote:

The listless economy, the soaring federal debt and the 8 per cent-plus jobless rate should be the talking points of the hour. Instead a fuss kicks up about a Republican Congressman who went skinny-dipping in the Sea of Galilee during a boozy 2011 junket to Israel.

Then an even more damaging one erupts, threatening to split the party, as a key Republican senate candidate raises the bizarre concept of "legitimate rape", and turns the spotlight on the party's controversial (many would say antediluvian) efforts to ban abortion.

And now the whole Tampa show could be thrown into chaos if - as forecasters warn is possible - Tropical Storm Isaac, currently churning into the Caribbean, arrives in south Florida along with thousands of Republican conventioneers on Monday as a fully fledged Category Two hurricane.

The unpredictable events listed are, of course, not the only reason Mr Romney has been underperforming, trailing not just in national polls but in the eight or nine swing states where the election will be won and lost. He may look like a casting candidate for Mount Rushmore.

But he's been a dismal campaigner thus far, stilted and oddly passive, scripted in everything he says, yet somehow always prone to the unfortunate remark.

Obama 4 more years
Romney returns to moron mormon bishop on Kolob.

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
There is great confusuion in this political debate due to the SUBTERFUGE of the neo-Cons, of which the Bush family is front and center. In reality, the neo-Cons are basically Rockefeller Republicans posing as Conservatives, ie. Bush, Rumsfeld, McCain, Cheney, Linsey Grahm, etc.
Of course, the Rockefellers are FAR BIGGER that to be pigenholed into a political party of a country, as they are GLOBALISTS thru and thru. Obama too. is in their GLOBALIST sphere and does their bidding.
The QUESTION is; where does Romney fit in. To me, he is a chameleon----but he seems to be drifting in the direction of Paul Ryan AND Ron Paul(Audit the Fed--Internet Freedom).
He is FAR Smarter than Bush and we have to hope he has some independence from the GLOBALIST POWER structure!
If not, then, as you said, "we're all screwed".

Judged:

1

1

1

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
He was Governor of Massachusetts and the are a VERY Democratic State ao with a Republican House and a Democratic Senate Mitt should have no ptoblem with Congress.
I am not familiar with any pledge of not raising taxes that Mitt made BUT there is TRILLIONS in fraud and waste and greed and corruption in Government that can and MUST be eliminated before taxes are put on the table.

Judged:

1

1

1

Vance1 wrote:

Hopefully Ron Paul supports will vote Romney/Ryan and that will cancel out the blk vote for the Obama.
‘debt, doubt and decline’= the last 4 yrs of the Obama economy
its alright not to vote for socialism/obama
its ok to vote to give your children/grandchildren to have a good future

Go Blue wrote:

<quoted text>Tea Party Racist....Loves America...Hates Americans.....

Judged:

1

1

1

Vance1 wrote:

Hopefully Ron Paul supports will vote Romney/Ryan and that will cancel out the blk vote for the Obama.
‘debt, doubt and decline’= the last 4 yrs of the Obama economy
its alright not to vote for socialism/obama
its ok to vote to give your children/grandchildren to have a good future