New day, old bickering on taxes between Obama, GOP

blaming republicans?
doesn't sound like the obama i know!

he's usually more specific with who he blames.

"You didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Can you say "Communist azzhole"
I knew you could.

as Norma implied I am amazed that some people able to make $4245 in 4 weeks on the internet. did you look at this web site http://goo.gl/UUZFR

as Norma implied I am amazed that Carey & Eighthman are able to make 4245 comments in 4 weeks on the internet & not make an intelligent statement once. did you look at this web site http://shedfulloftools.com

carey529 wrote:

blaming republicans?
doesn't sound like the obama i know!
he's usually more specific with who he blames.

missing Dr. Bill_mr! medictation with Robot;-000

Eighthman wrote:

"You didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Can you say "Communist azzhole"
I knew you could.

8boy! da Robutto confuel with mi new Name!!;-000h, dat how U nanogram vs americalories Obamatrixy;-000

Republicans in Congress and their nominee for president believe that the best way to create prosperity in America is to let it trickle down from the top," he said. "They believe that if our country spends trillions more on tax cuts for the wealthy, we'll somehow create jobs even if we have to pay for it by gutting things like education and training and by raising middle-class taxes. They're wrong."

Reaganomics has been/is an economic dismal failure.

Every president has tried voo-doo, trickle down, virtual free market, self regulating, tax cutting Reaganomics.

It has been the largest economic failure since Hooverism.

Wall Street Government wrote:

Republicans in Congress and their nominee for president believe that the best way to create prosperity in America is to let it trickle down from the top," he said. "They believe that if our country spends trillions more on tax cuts for the wealthy, we'll somehow create jobs even if we have to pay for it by gutting things like education and training and by raising middle-class taxes. They're wrong."
Reaganomics has been/is an economic dismal failure.
Every president has tried voo-doo, trickle down, virtual free market, self regulating, tax cutting Reaganomics.
It has been the largest economic failure since Hooverism.

His first mistake is considering tax cuts as spending. He thinks all money belongs to government. Therefore, he considers letting the ones who earned it keep more as taking money out of the treasury. It's not the government's money.

Pappa wrote:

<quoted text>
His first mistake is considering tax cuts as spending. He thinks all money belongs to government. Therefore, he considers letting the ones who earned it keep more as taking money out of the treasury. It's not the government's money.

Yes it would be, if that were true but it's not.
People who "earned" that money should pay the government that allows them to make the profit that they make, that they couldn't make anywhere else in the world.
So if teabaggers want to make that much profit, without giving back to the people they made a profit on, take your business elsewhere.
If you take your business overseas and the American jobs that go with it, you shouldn't be able to sell your crap here.

Then want a tax break.

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it would be, if that were true but it's not.
People who "earned" that money should pay the government that allows them to make the profit that they make, that they couldn't make anywhere else in the world.
So if teabaggers want to make that much profit, without giving back to the people they made a profit on, take your business elsewhere.
If you take your business overseas and the American jobs that go with it, you shouldn't be able to sell your crap here.
Then want a tax break.

Your wording speaks volumes 'the people they made a profit on'. You try to give the impression that the business owner is taking the customer's money with nothing in return. FYI, every business owner, TEA party member or not, wants to make as much profit as possible. That is the point of starting a business.

So either we up the taxes on the wealthy, or we up the taxes on your grandkids. Take your pick.
Corpoprations are crying about "the highest corporate taxrate in the world" What they fail to mention is that we are the most profitable market in the world. EVERYBODY wants to sell their goods in the USA, and the highest corporate tax rate in the world, is the price you have to pay to make more profits then you could ever make in any other world market.
Perhaps all these crybaby rich guys who don't want to pay their taxes could actually do some of this precious job creating they are always tauting, but apparently not doing.
IF the W tax cuts were suppose to create jobs, where are they? They have been in place for more than 8 years now, and remarkably that is how long the economy has been floundering, coinsidence? No.
They like to tell us the job creators will quit making us poor blue collar folk jobs if we raise taxes, because it will be too expensive to make money (like that makes even the slightest bit of sense). The exact opposite happened. They get to keep so much more of their money, hard work is not as necessary to keep it.
Me, you, and every other working class hero, has to make decisions everyday based on their income, and taxes. Giving away 20+% of your money is not easy for any of us. But when me and you do it, we have to give up stuff like, pork chops instead of steak, public schools not private schools, that trip to Disney, drive the family bomb for 2 more years instead of getting a new car, and taxes seriously affect those choices. Rich guys give up very little to pay their taxes. I would like to see a higher rate for highest earning folks, taxes so high they have to go out and create a few jobs to get their 15 year old daughter that new Benz she has been whining about.
That seems fair to me.

Pappa wrote:

<quoted text>
Your wording speaks volumes 'the people they made a profit on'. You try to give the impression that the business owner is taking the customer's money with nothing in return. FYI, every business owner, TEA party member or not, wants to make as much profit as possible. That is the point of starting a business.

"You try to give the impression that the business owner is taking the customer's money with nothing in return".

No, that would be the Wall Street traders and bankers.

The American business owner who sells overseas imports back to Americans who receive very little in return for the junk they buy.

Not every business owner wants to make as much profit "as possible", some are realizing a quality product made by their very own customers and consumers is the way to go and make a tidy profit as well.

Those are the business owners who deserve a tax break.