Disappointed Democrats must still vote for the party

It just that kind of voting that has gotten us into this mess with Wash DC now.

The DNC told FLORIDA to kiss off and Dorothy wants to reward them with voters that are willing to do anything.

Many Republicans did the same in 2000 and see where that has gotten us, congress is firmly in control by Democrats. Dorothy news flash, they are all the same.

You are suppose to vote for the person who will do the best job for this country. When you vote for someone just because of their party , then you are too ignorant to research the issues and candidate and make an intelligent choice. I will never vote for someone just because of what party they are in. This country is too important to me. I will vote for who I think will do the best job.
Please open your mind and do your home work before you vote. You will be glad you did.

There is a legitimate excuse for a Democrat to not support the Democratic candidate:

Racism.

Vet wrote:

Many Republicans did the same in 2000 and see where that has gotten us, congress is firmly in control by Democrats.

Hardly. The best they can do at the moment is keep Bush & "Neocon Corp." in check.

The Twelth Monkey wrote:

There is a legitimate excuse for a Democrat to not support the Democratic candidate:
Racism.

Or....he's less qualified and votes too liberal.

The Twelth Monkey wrote:

There is a legitimate excuse for a Democrat to not support the Democratic candidate:
Racism.

Or the candidate has a muslim past and has sympthies for the Taliban, Iran and Al Quieda. I think it's a plot for Al Quieda to infiltrate the US government!

Your choice is as simple as this --- Democrats let the illegals stay; Republicans will send them back.

Sawgrass Wilson wrote:

<quoted text>
Or the candidate has a muslim past and has sympthies for the Taliban, Iran and Al Quieda. I think it's a plot for Al Quieda to infiltrate the US government!

WRONG again, Bucko! RESEARCH! You just might learn something...beside what Ruch and Bill tell you. Schmuck!

NO IT ALL wrote:

Your choice is as simple as this --- Democrats let the illegals stay; Republicans will send them back.

HA! You're joking, right? John McBush is not gonna TOUCH the illegals!

Sawgrass Wilson wrote:

<quoted text>
Or the candidate has a muslim past and has sympthies for the Taliban, Iran and Al Quieda. I think it's a plot for Al Quieda to infiltrate the US government!

Oh, don't forget that he'll take the guns away from all you semi-literate Southerners, too!

Whatever anybody does don't listen to that crock of poo. Vote for the country. If it's Obama then your not voting for your country. It will take the Obama mistake to realize that it's not just Bush who is wrong. I don't think he is. The media does and the leftist idiots are weak. Just open the doors to the terrorist. Don't worry Obama will.
At least Hillary is a TRUE American. Obama is a phony and his wife hates the US too.

Peeved wrote:

<quoted text>
WRONG again, Bucko! RESEARCH! You just might learn something...beside what Ruch and Bill tell you. Schmuck!

Research. Who the hell is Ruch? You meant Rush?
Turn off your MSNBC and stay far away from that dushbag Ariana Huffington. It's made you stupid.

We Democrats have no choice. Both Obama and Hillary suck, so since McCain is the lesser of three evils, he'll get our vote.

Years ago someone predicted a white backlash. It is here. Count me as another McDemocrat. I will vote for a Repugnican before I will vote for someone with Hussein in his name. The Democratic party ignored my vote in the primaries, so the other party gets it in November.

Will Dearborn wrote:

Years ago someone predicted a white backlash. It is here. Count me as another McDemocrat. I will vote for a Repugnican before I will vote for someone with Hussein in his name. The Democratic party ignored my vote in the primaries, so the other party gets it in November.

Yep! McCain is by far the best choice of the three, even though he is not exactly what we'd call a prize either. It's amazing how out of all the possible choices, we Democrats picked 2 unelectable losers like Obama and Hillary as Presidential candidates.

The Twelth Monkey wrote:

There is a legitimate excuse for a Democrat to not support the Democratic candidate:
Racism.

Oh you mean the 90% of black voters who will not support Hillary? Yeah they are racists.

I give the Obama's people and their stooges in the new media lots of credit. By calling rural and working class white Democrats - "racists" - you have insured that they will vote for McCain in November. Nice job.

Will Dearborn wrote:

Years ago someone predicted a white backlash. It is here. Count me as another McDemocrat. I will vote for a Repugnican before I will vote for someone with Hussein in his name. The Democratic party ignored my vote in the primaries, so the other party gets it in November.

They made it even worse including Howard Dean the head of the DNC. They ignored FL and MI voters and they insulted whites who voted for Hillary by painting those Hillary voters as racists. They never said the 90% of black people voting for Obama and Not for Hillary were racists. The white hillary voters have been smeared as a "racists" by the Obama people. These white voters will never vote for Obama in Nov.

The Twelth Monkey wrote:

There is a legitimate excuse for a Democrat to not support the Democratic candidate:
Racism.

That's like saying all democratic party voters are welfare queens. There are legitimate reasons to vote or not vote for a candidate. Party affiliation is of much lesser importance.

BadNews wrote:

We Democrats have no choice. Both Obama and Hillary suck, so since McCain is the lesser of three evils, he'll get our vote.

That's the way I see it too. I, too, will be forced to vote for McCain. Out of all the politicians in both the Democratic and Republican Parties, how they managed to narrow it down to those three sorry excuses for Presidential candidates, I'll never know. No matter who gets elected, we're going to be sorry.

Obama Backs U.N. Bill to Disarm Americans

Four Winds 10
May 7, 2008

This is just in from Sen. Coburn’s office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. No one in the media has brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here.

Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Obama’s bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate

Senator Coburn is blocking this bill.

Patrick Guinn

Obama’s bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations.

More truth at www.infowars.com