Fox News admits on air to lying about President Obama

flat tax wrote:

would help with the 49% not paying a thingf

Judged:

1

1

1

rwtaylor56 wrote:

<quoted text>
many of the 49% you're referring to pay a higher total tax rate than those in the top 1%. Just so you know.:)

sam the painter wrote:

America has become virtually undefeatable in direct military conflicts.
Especially in what the military calls 4-C-I. That stands for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence.
That's because we spend $711 billion a year on our military budget.
41% of what the entire world allocates to their armed forces.
What devaluing your currency also does is make the debt you repay to other countries cheaper.
This angers the people you owe money to.
With America $16 trillion in the hole, it's easy to see why that would be an attractive option to some folks in Washington.
America is on the brink of a full-scale currency war?
In a worst-case scenario you've got a global Great Depression, as well as international turmoil that could escalate to military conflicts.
We went from a 5 trillion dollar debt on 9-11-01
to over 15 trillion in 2012!! Thanks to obama.
So that's about $4 trillion of our funny money that's flooded the global markets and weakened our dollar by as much as 27%.
From 2001 to 2012 food prices is up 148%
From 2001 to 2012 energy prices up 468%
If cheapening your money was the way to wealth, Zimbabwe and Argentina would own the world today.
35% of all oil that is carried across the sea travels through Strait of Hormuz.
An economic Pearl Harbor we never saw coming.
Americans panic, the Dow plunges, our dollar is decimated.
The contagion spreads to London, Tokyo, everywhere.
There is a run on banks as everything starts collapsing.
Trading is frozen on Wall Street.
But, China is not done.
Thanks to Washington, D.C., they're tapped into our Fed Wire and Treasury auction network.
So their hackers unleash a cyber-warfare attack on the U.S. to disrupt our financial exchanges, bank transactions, the power grid, and our Internet backbone.
Europe is a heartbeat away from economic Armageddon.

Bama Yankee wrote:

<quoted text>I'm curious.....

Just how can anyone not paying any tax at all be paying a higher rate than those in the top 1%?

Bama Yankee wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm curious.....
Just how can anyone not paying any tax at all be paying a higher rate than those in the top 1%?

TerryE wrote:

They twist with "Lib-speak" and say that it's "Proportunately Higher" My answer to that is make more money!
Regards, Terri
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

TerryE wrote:

<quoted text>They twist with "Lib-speak" and say that it's "Proportunately Higher" My answer to that is make more money!
Regards, Terri

rwtaylor56 wrote:

<quoted text>
If the rich object to paying so much in taxes tell them to just not make as much money. One way to accomplish that would be to actually pay their employees a living wage.:)

Judged:

1

1

1

rwtaylor56 wrote:

<quoted text>
If the rich object to paying so much in taxes tell them to just not make as much money. One way to accomplish that would be to actually pay their employees a living wage.:)

Judged:

1

1

californio wrote:

<quoted text>No they will still make the money, they will just go and live in the Cayman island, Gilbrater, Monaco etc where they dont have to pay the taxes

rwtaylor56 wrote:

<quoted text>
If the rich object to paying so much in taxes tell them to just not make as much money. One way to accomplish that would be to actually pay their employees a living wage.:)

Judged:

1

1

1

Bama Yankee wrote:

<quoted text>
How about we start with all those multi-millionaires in Congress?

Bama Yankee wrote:

<quoted text>How about we start with all those multi-millionaires in Congress?

Judged:

1

1

1

Razors Edge wrote:

Here we go,Soviet Tactics already!!!

No doubt, we need to preserve and to protect Medicare, and to do that requires more than simply defending "Medicare as we know it." Members of Congress from both sides of the aisle clearly recognize that if we do nothing, "Medicare as we know it" will not be there for future generations.

President Obama's health care law offers one solution. It empowers a panel of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats to unilaterally decide what Medicare will and will not cover. Specifically, the 2010 law proposes to control costs by granting this new bureaucracy — called the Independent Payment Advisory Board — the authority to cut Medicare payments to doctors and other health providers. But this approach of twisting screws on physicians, of relying on price controls to wring savings from a financially broken program, cannot work. Either providers will exit the system or seniors can expect to see access to health services severely restricted. Indeed, the nonpartisan chief actuary of the Medicare program predicts that under the president's health care law, 15 percent of hospitals will go bankrupt by 2019. This number rises to 40 percent by 2050.

I recently voted for an alternative solution to this top-down, one-size-fits-all approach. This approach, contained in the House-passed Fiscal Year 2013 budget proposal, puts patients and seniors in control of their health care decisions rather than bureaucrats and Washington technocrats.

Rep.Mike Coffman.Washington.
Razors Edge
Palos Hills, IL
1 min ago
A Panel of 15 Liberal/Democrat Cronies..Unelected??
Will be deciding what treatment Seniors will recieve
Better not get sick if you are a Conservative?????
What is this? A rerun of the Orwellian Big Brother?
I suppose one has to report to the Kremlin to try
and appeal anything?? Did you ever think my fellow
Americans that you would live to see this Quasi
Soviet Bull Sh&t??????????

Judged:

1

Go Blue wrote:

<quoted text>Absoltely true....eliminate the GREED.....

TerryE wrote:

Ha ha ha ! ROFMAO. How much does someone have to make before their desire to make more becomes "GREED"? Howcum "Poor" people are never "Greedy", only those we want to punish for being successful?
Regards, Terri
<quoted text>

Romi wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you are confusing the word need with the word greed. There is a difference in wanting to put food on the table and a roof over your head and I don't know let's say putting an elevator in your garage because you have too many cars.