Clinton: Why can't Obama win big states?

Old Man Charlie wrote:

<quoted text>
It is odd that you say that. I understand that it's the uneducated, lower income folks that go for Hillary.

Income and education levels have nothing to do with being "smart." GWB is a prime example. When Obama supporters make statements like this one it gives credence to the perception that Obama and his followers are arrogant elitists. I'm not saying that you are...just suggesting that you might not want to heighten an already unattractive aspect of Obama's base that seems to bother many voters.

American Atheist wrote:

<quoted text>
whats up with this pasting books,Obama already has won the DNC nomination hes won twice as many states as Hillary you people that think otherwise are looney tunes. We dems need to stick together stop the arguing and vote for Obama when he wins.If Hillary would stop the attack campaign Obama just might pick her for VP.
watch this video this explains why she cannot win.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

It is so heart-warming to see atheists backing their good friend, Barack Hussein Obama.

I believe if Hillary doesn't get the nomination, she will just turn around and run as an independent and be our next president. Just so long as it isn't Obama.

I think Obama has a better shot than Hillary.

If I had to bet my life I would bet that McCain wins although I wont be voting for him. He has the luxury of being the default candidate although I think most people voting for him, are really just voting against Oballery. IMO he is a weak candidate.

Hillary running as an independant would truly be sad.

Hillary was able to use her big Clinton’s attack machine in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, NJ and NY where the Governors and mayors were part of the Clintons attack machine.
Governors and mayors support of the Clintons with the right ‘tools’ was priceless.
In addition large states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, NJ and NY has a large concentration of old White women that were young during the 1950's and 1960's when Blacks were still discriminated and were involved in unrest and demonstrations against Whites.
These historic events of the 1960’s explain why old White women support Hillary and will never vote for a Black president.
Otherwise, Hillary is known all over the country as the most disingenuous woman that will promise anything today but will not say the same promise tomorrow because she forgot what she said already and as a woman she has the prerogative to change her mind at least once a day.
Nevertheless, Hillary was surprisingly supported by no other than the right wing talk show hosts like Limbaugh, Hannity and Molsberg that keep besmirching Obama 24 hours a day using racial attacks.
The right wing talk show hosts that viciously attacked Hillary during the last year surprisingly ‘discovered’ Hillary as their new candidate since they hate McCain.
The result is that Hillary could defeat McCain with the support of the right wing talk show hosts that will cross the line to support a liberal Dem over the weakened GOP candidate.
Good for the right wing talk show hosts to destroy their own GOP conservative party for Hillary’s success and lose their listeners forever.

Jones wrote:

Hillary was able to use her big Clinton’s attack machine in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, NJ and NY where the Governors and mayors were part of the Clintons attack machine.
Governors and mayors support of the Clintons with the right ‘tools’ was priceless.
In addition large states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, NJ and NY has a large concentration of old White women that were young during the 1950's and 1960's when Blacks were still discriminated and were involved in unrest and demonstrations against Whites.
These historic events of the 1960’s explain why old White women support Hillary and will never vote for a Black president.
Otherwise, Hillary is known all over the country as the most disingenuous woman that will promise anything today but will not say the same promise tomorrow because she forgot what she said already and as a woman she has the prerogative to change her mind at least once a day.
Nevertheless, Hillary was surprisingly supported by no other than the right wing talk show hosts like Limbaugh, Hannity and Molsberg that keep besmirching Obama 24 hours a day using racial attacks.
The right wing talk show hosts that viciously attacked Hillary during the last year surprisingly ‘discovered’ Hillary as their new candidate since they hate McCain.
The result is that Hillary could defeat McCain with the support of the right wing talk show hosts that will cross the line to support a liberal Dem over the weakened GOP candidate.
Good for the right wing talk show hosts to destroy their own GOP conservative party for Hillary’s success and lose their listeners forever.

"These historic events of the 1960’s explain why old White women support Hillary and will never vote for a Black president."

Why do you think you know the minds of "old white women"? Kind of like "typical white person". That's the problem with liberals - they don't see individuals, just groups.

Maybe women who grew up during the "women's lib" days would be thrilled to have a woman president.

Dang youngins'!

The problem is that most people don't know what White People really want. Well, guess what:

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/

Uncle Ruckus wrote:

The problem is that most people don't know what White People really want. Well, guess what:
http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/

rotf I'm white and like new balance shoes too funny.

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
"These historic events of the 1960’s explain why old White women support Hillary and will never vote for a Black president."
Why do you think you know the minds of "old white women"? Kind of like "typical white person". That's the problem with liberals - they don't see individuals, just groups.
Maybe women who grew up during the "women's lib" days would be thrilled to have a woman president.
Dang youngins'!

It may sound hilarious but Hillary could be the most pacifist, clueless and incompatible commander in chief in US history at time of war against Islamic terrorists even she could not 'stand' seeing US generals in uniform the White House during the Clintons years.
During the Clintons ‘happy years’ the US Military was cut, slashed and weakened to enjoy ‘the peace dividends’ when Osama Bin laden was set free by bill Clinton.
However, Hillary could be back to rule the American people by the 'silent force' of White old women votes that want to see a White female rules the American people.
History can be funny and unbelievable sometimes.

Jones wrote:

<quoted text>It may sound hilarious but Hillary could be the most pacifist, clueless and incompatible commander in chief in US history at time of war against Islamic terrorists even she could not 'stand' seeing US generals in uniform the White House during the Clintons years.
During the Clintons ‘happy years’ the US Military was cut, slashed and weakened to enjoy ‘the peace dividends’ when Osama Bin laden was set free by bill Clinton.
However, Hillary could be back to rule the American people by the 'silent force' of White old women votes that want to see a White female rules the American people.
History can be funny and unbelievable sometimes.

I don't think an American president "rules" people. We don't have a monarchy - yet.

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think an American president "rules" people. We don't have a monarchy - yet.

Generally speaking you are right...indeed.
However, in a single case in US history you are clearly wrong when talking about the Queen to be… Hillary Rodham Clinton who inherited the second monarchy in US history of the Clintons legendary family from the first monarch King Bill.

Jones wrote:

<quoted text>Generally speaking you are right...indeed.
However, in a single case in US history you are clearly wrong when talking about the Queen to be… Hillary Rodham Clinton who inherited the second monarchy in US history of the Clintons legendary family from the first monarch King Bill.

I was going to say that we vote for our president, but we don't really. Eventually we get to vote, but with superdelegates, Howard Dean, etc., we don't get to vote until THEY decide WHO we get to vote for.

I think the political parties are more of a monarchy than the actual presidency. Just my humble opinion.

God save us from Gore and the rest. We don't stand a chance. They are all out to leave the border open and feed those who survive to the Bankers.