House GOP plans to target health-care law bit by bit

As the incoming Republican leaders in the House seek to make good on their campaign promise to roll back President Barack Obama's health-care overhaul, they say they intend to use their new muscle to cut off money for the law, setting up a series of partisan clashes and testing Democratic commitment to the legislation. Full Story
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
dave s

Tiffin, OH

#41 Nov 9, 2010
missskeptic wrote:
Mike DeWine has promised to waste millions of dollars of taxpayer money to fight the healthcare reform law, just to show those Teabirchers he's tough! The case will be thrown out, and DeWine will still be a hero to the ignorant.
actually its about time and part of the reason that weasel cordray was fired. it would appear the states have a case to repeal it as well.
Here comes the Klowns

Powell, OH

#42 Nov 9, 2010
dave s wrote:
<quoted text>
actually its about time and part of the reason that weasel cordray was fired. it would appear the states have a case to repeal it as well.
Supreme Court just turned it down. You must lovvvve seeing your tax dollars wasted. What would your fellow Tea partyers think?????

Since: Feb 10

Columbus, OH

#43 Nov 10, 2010
Here comes the Klowns wrote:
<quoted text>
Supreme Court just turned it down. You must lovvvve seeing your tax dollars wasted. What would your fellow Tea partyers think?????
Where's your documentation for that claim? Even Reuter's latest story on the lawsuit dates back to 10/14/10 and states that the Judgge has ruled that the case will move forward an a hearing is set for 12/2/10. See http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69D5CO2...

Please provide links to verifiable sources or don't post bogus claims.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#44 Nov 11, 2010
He mentions a Supreme court ruling and you post a link to a ruling by a judge in Florida?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Try that link and pay attention! You sound like a professional republicunt.
Westside Professional wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's your documentation for that claim? Even Reuter's latest story on the lawsuit dates back to 10/14/10 and states that the Judgge has ruled that the case will move forward an a hearing is set for 12/2/10. See http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69D5CO2...
Please provide links to verifiable sources or don't post bogus claims.

Since: Feb 10

Columbus, OH

#45 Nov 12, 2010
davy wrote:
He mentions a Supreme court ruling and you post a link to a ruling by a judge in Florida?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Try that link and pay attention! You sound like a professional ****.
<quoted text>
The request for the link is because SCOTUS has NOT taken either of the two suits filed against the Healthcare reform bill. There is NO Supreme Court Ruling because it hasn't agreed to review the case(s). The case(s) are still in lower level courts, and those courts ARE going forward with the lawsuits.
Liddleguy

Dublin, OH

#46 Nov 14, 2010
SDH wrote:
So in your world Liddleguy, let's say a person who is being treated for high blood pressure loses his job, and health insurance. He gets a new job, but his new insurance company says "Sorry", your blood pressure problem was before our time. You have to pay for your medications yourself. This is why we needed health care reform in the first place, and why I might remind you, was partially why Obama was elected President.
Your ideas are socialistic, similar to your president;s. If a man loses his job and has high blood pressure he should take medicine for it that HE purchased, not me. The idea of forcing health insuers to insure people with existing conditions, is like forcing auto insurers to insure repeat DUI offenders. People who think premiums are going to go down while insurers costs are going up, are a little light in the loafers. Git a grip, lib.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Tom Harkin Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Taylor Swift is having more than a moment Nov 7 Butters 13
Ernst: Harkin's 'attractive,' 'nice' comment of... Nov 5 Angela Lee 2
Republicans eye slim Senate majority Nov 2 bottlecap 1
For-profit colleges face 'gainful employment' rule Oct 31 RustyS 8
Hillary Clinton in Iowa stirs 2016 speculation Oct 28 Maude 19
Bill Clinton takes a shot at Netayahu Oct 26 Asian Guy 70
Quinnipiac: Little change in Iowa Senate, guber... Oct '14 Ace McMillan 1

Tom Harkin People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE