McCain Favors Military Draft

oriana wrote:

<quoted text>
Winning is when we defeat alquaeda and Iran in Iraq.
even the NYT says the war is almost over.
did you hear that most of Iraq is now in the hand of Iraqi's.
anbar provence is the latest victory.
terror attacks on Iraq are down to the lowest levels.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599...
AREN'T you angry that you're not getting this news on MSNBC and the daily KOS

Judged:

1

1

1

Constitution Party wrote:

<quoted text>
Liberal open his mouth, awe how cute.

Humanist wrote:

<quoted text>
You get more brainwashed by the right everyday Oriana.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>How can we defeat Al Qaeda in Iraq when they are based in Afghanistan, huh genius? How about Bin Laden? Remember him. BUSH nor McCain and his 'surge' can seem to find him. Talk about weak. You won't hear that on FOX news.

Humanist wrote:

<quoted text>
It is senseless to declare war on an idea, whether it is drugs or terrorism. There is no way for either to end or be accomplished. The only way for a war on terrorism to end would be to kill every last terrorist. We both know that that is never going to happen, just like you are never going to eliminate all drugs. Bush has painted us into a corner. McCain will continue that policy. Okay, I will now wait for you to call me a liberal, commie, phoney professor. Take your best shot.

Judged:

1

1

1

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>yes, that is common in older folks when they laugh too hard and that Palin speech was certainly a knee slapper . I'm sure there were many-a-wet DEPENDS, including McCains.
I thought it was funny how she went on and on and on and on and on and on and on about Obama. I think she wants to have HIS baby!!!!
Hillary, now there's a class act. Enjoy your pretty little country bumpkin while you can. In two months, she'll be back in Alaska, probably dropping another baby out of her ginormous baby hole, when the repubes lose the election.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>How can we defeat Al Qaeda in Iraq when they are based in Afghanistan, huh genius? How about Bin Laden? Remember him. BUSH nor McCain and his 'surge' can seem to find him. Talk about weak. You won't hear that on FOX news.

Judged:

2

1

1

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>Kind of like Republicans like to kill our boys in uniform.
Then you wave flags at your convention like you CARE about our soldiers. Notices all the soldiers last night at your pathetic convention WERE NOT CLAPPING. They saw right through the hypocracy. They know you are the reason their brothers are dead.
Yes, your party likes to wait for those babies to grow up so you can put your NRA bullets in them, or send soldiers to be unneccessarily murdered, or electrocute them or inject them. You guys actually get boners when you murder people. Especially Bush. You could hang your hat on his wiener.

Judged:

1

1

1

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>When do we get our 1st place trophy for 'winning'? Do we get a check too? How about a gold medal?
What does winning mean? No republican can answer that.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>George monkeyboybush WAS the President, not doing his job on 9/11 but it makes sense you believe his 'tough on terrorism' lie. Too bad he wasn't tough before 3,000 Americans died ON HIS WATCH.
He's so stupid, he still hasn't found Bin Laden. One man and billions of dollars later, still no Bin Laden. Guess what CLINTON did to the guys who bombed the WTC in 1993? Caught them, tried them, and put them in prison. Now CLINTON was a REAL President. Bush must hate that!!!!!!!!Even his own father considers him a failure.

Judged:

1

1

1

Combat Medic wrote:

<quoted text>
Winning means defeating terrorism.
Cowards can't understand that.

oriana wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess you haven't read this on the daily KOZ
you need to broaden your horizons
The US has conducted yet another cross-border strike in the badlands of Pakistan's tribal agencies. In the fifth cross-border strike in six days, unmanned aircraft operating from Afghanistan struck an al Qaeda safe house in the village of Gurwak in Taliban-controlled North Waziristan.
Five to seven people have been reported killed in the strike. AFP reported five "foreign militants" - a term used to describe al Qaeda operatives, were killed. The identity of those killed has not been disclosed as Pakistani security forces are attempting to reach the scene of the attack. Geo TV reported that four children and three women were killed in the strike.
The village of Gurwak is in territory run by the powerful Haqqani family. The Haqqanis are closely allied with the Taliban and al Qaeda. The Haqqanis run a parallel government in North Waziristan and conduct military and suicide operations in eastern Afghanistan. Siraj Haqqani, the son of Taliban leader Jalaluddin Haqqani, has close ties to Osama bin Laden and is one of the most wanted terrorists in Afghanistan.
*****
gee, who do YOU think they're after?
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jMxBOP0lwB...

Judged:

1

1

1

Combat Medic wrote:

<quoted text>
Here is a statement of stupidity in it's purest form:
"Now CLINTON was a REAL President".
Clinton downsized our military putting many brave men and women in jeopardy.
Clinton refused to give the order to take out Bin Laden when our military had him in their sights. Bin Laden was planning the 9/11 attack at that time.
Source: Newsmax.com
"An increasingly bold series of terrorist attacks targeting American interests was met with tough talk from former President Bill Clinton but little action, according to terrorism experts asked to analyze the U.S. response to attacks between 1993 and 2000".
"Larry Johnson, formerly with the CIA and the State Department and the current CEO of the Business Exposure Reduction Group, said he believes Clinton's weak response to the terrorist attacks that occurred during his presidency paved the way for the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon".
The Clinton's made a mockery of the White House with Whitewater and all the other scandals.
Clinton was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury.
That's the Clinton legacy in a nutshell.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>And intelligence involves listening and learning.
There are 2 billion Muslims in the world. Tell me, brave one, how are you going to kill them all? You idiots can't even figure out how to get 12 million illegals out of our country but you believe you can win against the world wide threat of terrorism. That's good stuff.
You responded 3 times to me and I'd be flattered if you mattered, but you don't.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>Oh boy, you really are knee deep in your partisan beliefs.
Let's just say Clinton downsized the military. Fine. We still had approx 1 million soldiers we could have sent to Iraq but Rummy insisted we go in with a military force less than 200,000 boots on the ground. The generals in command wanted 375,000 to 400,000. That CIVILIAN decision by Rummy was a CATASTROPHE once the insurgency kicked in and our boys were then fighting gorilla warfare. Memories of Somalia anyone?
Why this is somehow Clintons fault is a mystery to me but your side insists our economic crisis today is a result of Clintons economic policy 8 YEARS AGO so of course the military's shortcomings today are Clintons fault. Clearly, you and your party are suffering from both dementia and alzheimers.
PS: Contrary to your giddy comments, my nephew is alive and well. Honorably discharged for back injuries, he is now in Law school and sponsors programs for Vet support and paraplegics. My father, my nephew and my brother in law all served us proudly and no condescending comments from you will change that, soldier.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>Oh boy, you really are knee deep in your partisan beliefs.
Let's just say Clinton downsized the military. Fine. We still had approx 1 million soldiers we could have sent to Iraq but Rummy insisted we go in with a military force less than 200,000 boots on the ground. The generals in command wanted 375,000 to 400,000. That CIVILIAN decision by Rummy was a CATASTROPHE once the insurgency kicked in and our boys were then fighting gorilla warfare. Memories of Somalia anyone?
Why this is somehow Clintons fault is a mystery to me but your side insists our economic crisis today is a result of Clintons economic policy 8 YEARS AGO so of course the military's shortcomings today are Clintons fault. Clearly, you and your party are suffering from both dementia and alzheimers.
PS: Contrary to your giddy comments, my nephew is alive and well. Honorably discharged for back injuries, he is now in Law school and sponsors programs for Vet support and paraplegics. My father, my nephew and my brother in law all served us proudly and no condescending comments from you will change that, soldier.

Humanist wrote:

<quoted text>
That's the best comeback you could come back with. You know XOXOXO is right. If McCain does follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell, he's sure to find George W. Bush there.

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>Neocon opens his a$$ and speaks.

Judged:

1

1

1

Combat Medic wrote:

<quoted text>
PS: Contrary to your giddy comments, my nephew is alive and well. Honorably discharged for back injuries, he is now in Law school and sponsors programs for Vet support and paraplegics. My father, my nephew and my brother in law all served us proudly and no condescending comments from you will change that, soldier.
I have never, nor will I ever make a disrespectful comment about your family's military history.
You disgrace them by your slanderous comments about the President and our Military and trying to ride on their coat-tails.

Constitution Party wrote:

<quoted text>
Usually Libertarians accuse Republicans of being neo-cons. Watching a Liberal do it makes me embarrassed to be a human being.