Sep 4, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger
Full story: Bismark - Mandan Blog Voices![]()
Comments
|
His reasoning is good, however not easy for folks to absorb. When we say what the government shoudl spend, we usually don't see the other side of the equation, i.e from whom do they take the money in order to spend it.
Of course in the US federally they get aroudn that problem with debt, i.e high spend low tax. It's only delaying the day when they have to say "since we gave Mr X some money, we need to take it ( plus costs) from Mrs Y" |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 North Dakota Senate Election: Republican J... | 14 hr | Bill | 2 |
| Limbaugh: Tests show no ailments after chest pain | Fri | Bama Yankee | 1 |
| South Dakota lawmaker pushing North Dakota Gov ... | Dec 23 | Mike Trice | 3 |
| U.S. Senate panel OKs bill to overturn ruling o... | Dec 21 | CasinoYes | 1 |
| Opinion: Strassel: Democrats on the Health-Care... | Dec 18 | too droll to... | 5 |
| Group urges government to invest in electric cars | Dec 17 | Rick Rogers | 5 |
| Case New Holland lays off 128 in Nebraska | Dec 17 | john | 5 |