Dec 22, 2011 | Posted by: roboblogger
In a year when controversy has surrounded the Environmental Protection Agency like never before, it has had no bigger defender than Sen.
Comments
|
Toronto, Canada |
There is NO controversy. There is resistance to the EPA adding it's weight to regulating GHG emissions, even though that is it's MANDATE. But denial and the power of the fossil fuel industry has made a 'tempest in a tea pot' about it.
Fact is that we NEED the EPA to prevent the abuses of the past (which we no longer have the excuse of 'ignorance' and 'common practice' about). |
|
“Be true to yourself.” Since: Oct 10
|
Judged: 1 1 1 LessFactMoreHype, alias: http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin... |
|
Tell me when this thread is updated: |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8 hr | Oregon Troll Alert | 42 |
|
|
9 hr | pigpen911 | 2 |
|
|
12 hr | Mark Goldes | 1 |
|
|
Fri | Will Dockery | 51 |
|
|
May 29 | b4its2late | 1 |
|
|
May 28 | Male Matters | 1 |
|
|
May 25 | harvey | 8 |