Barack Obama, our next President

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
That supposed to be a haiku?

bless you

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
Is anyone even talking about Obama's "right war" in Afghanistan?
Does this admin even give a shit about the kids over there anymore, or are our soldiers on their own until November?
I know for a FACT some are feeling forgotten about.

Bush declared Bin Laden (you know, that guy we went there to get) irrelevant and abandoned them in Afghanistan to cart off their resources to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9-11 or Al Qaida.

The war should have been over long before Obama took office.

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
No idea, never even been in a PWR. Been in an HTGR and BWR's from every manufacturer if that's any help.

was referring to plant design engineer...no big deal....

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
You traded a case of Yoohoo® for 8 track tapes? What're you daft? You know you can get the Bee Gees on CD nowadays dontcha?
Anyway no, but I do need the timing sequence for a '56 Studdebaker®.

NOW you tell me.
Let's see '52,'53,'54,'56, nope sorry can't help you.

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Got the lemonade. Thanks.
Now about "shared prosperity"
<latched on like a pit bull on a jugular>

How about shared responsibility? Yeah, I'm down with shared responsibility.

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
Feel free to cite your "reliable" sources.

Feel free to prove me wrong.

Romney will lose!

Go Democrats! The best!

For the people!

All people.

Good luck!

VOTE.

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
I never said i didn't believe it. I asked you to provide 10 specific examples. Out of 350 pieces of legislation, that should have been a piece of cake. But you couldn't do it.
What I accused you of was blindly following what other liberals say without doing any research on your own. And you proved it with your "statistic".

If you believed it, then you would ask for me to prove it. Unless you were just being a dick.

I read lots of articles.

You should try it sometime, Maybe then you won't be so uninformed.

gossipgirl wrote:

Did Ryan not know all the news groups except Fox would be pointing out his lies the day after he spoke??? Number 1 was sooooo easy. The GM plant closed before Obama was ever President.

Almost everything Paul said was a lie with the Repubs just cheering away. I can't believe the hypocrite would talk about Obama taking $7 billion from Medicare when Paul's own plan does away with it ALL. They hand you a voucher and a good luck under the Ryan/Romney Plan. Hypocritical bastard.

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama is responsible for peoples deaths. He belongs in jail.

And Bush Cheney belong in Leavenworth for war crimes against Iraq and our own soldiers that were killed because of their lies.

Clint Eastwood speaking tonight at the RNC

Homer aint saying nothing bad about Clint Eastwood.

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
So its OK to confiscate money from my out box but not my in box.
So all those outbox is grater or equal to their inbox pays taxes on 100% of their income. And those who outbox is less than theor in box do not.
Sounds like more like a tax advantage for the wealthy. You must be part Republican.

Bite your tongue, I'm no big-government Republican!

You have a choice as to where and how much your "outbox" gets spent. You can save or invest your outbox rather than spending it and if some arbitrary amount isn't confiscated before its spent you'll have that much more to spend and lend that much more to the tax coffers. Under your assumption you spend all you earn. Ok, let's look at the math.

You make 100
If the government takes 20% you end up with 80.
If you invest that 80 and yield 10% at the end of the term you have 88.
Now go spend the 88; the government ends up with 20 and you end up with 88 worth of goods and services.

Let's say the government doesn't take the 20% and you still have 100
You do the same now you have 110.
Now if the government takes the 20 it took before you now have 90 worth of goods and services.

Real-Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
I'ts embarrasing to know we come from the same species as Yepperz and the rest.

Nice try at elevating yourself, morons like you are far closer to the orangutan, just not as smart.

Mitt does have an advantage over others in his knowledge of the issues facing us.

After all, he's has been both for & against them all at some point or other.

Mitt takes politics like a debating class. His audience decides which side he is on & he argues for it.

But I like John McCain's approach. He is for what ever voters are for.

Hurricane leslie headed to Charlette to meet up with the DNC.

Homer wrote:

Clint Eastwood speaking tonight at the RNC
Homer aint saying nothing bad about Clint Eastwood.

Clint to Oblamer,"Feeling lucky,Punk?"

"This here,is the Most Powerful RNC

Convention,in the World"..LOL..

AmericanMan wrote:

<quoted text>Almost everything Paul said was a lie with the Repubs just cheering away. I can't believe the hypocrite would talk about Obama taking $7 billion from Medicare when Paul's own plan does away with it ALL. They hand you a voucher and a good luck under the Ryan/Romney Plan. Hypocritical bastard.

Totally!

You said it.....RNC "lie in" 2012. Why lie? Lose with dignity! Romney will lose.

Tune in to DNC "Truth in" 2012......We don't need to lie!
No Cayman flagged super yachts of Republicans here.
Charlotte, NC. A really great city, fun! Nice venues.

It's hurricane season.....Democrats are smart.....five hours from the ocean! Not right on it. Republicans cant plan to good? Oh right, hurricane season, it only comes EVERY YEAR!

Whoop whoop!! Gonna be great. President Obama is a genius!

Getting ready to go! Whoop whoop!

The real party getting things done for everyone.

VOTE. JOIN THE DEMOCRAT MAJORITY! ALL WELCOME.

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Is there an economic plan somewhere in this mess?

I thought she was quoting Marx.

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>That guy Bob went on dozens of interviews so someone must be hiring. Too bad he sucks at interviewing.

Nice catch Homer.

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
So you get
Funny, I don't see the word "all circumstances" anywhere.

Huh ...

What do these words meant in your language?

"affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed."