Holder Tells Congress Obama Wants To Ban Guns

Feb 8, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: AmmoLand

Last Thursday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to answer questions about his role in the deadly "Fast and Furious" gun-running scandal.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 19 of19
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

"In a rash attempt to deflect attention away from himself and his own irresponsibility, Holder let Congress know that the Obama administration is still working toward the day when it can reinstate former President Bill Clinton’s so-called “assault weapons” ban."

According to Holder:

"This administration has consistently favored the re-institution of the assault weapons ban. It is something that we think was useful in the past with regard to the reduction that we’ve seen in crime, and certainly would have a positive impact on our relationship and the crime situation in Mexico."

"Fast and Furious" is their "Burning Reichstag".

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

History speaks:
.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study last week that states there is no evidence to prove gun-control laws are effective in preventing violence.
http://www.ctsportsmen.com/issues/cdc_questio...
.
joey

Maringouin, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

holder wants to ban guns after he lets hundreds of guns go across the border.then 2 border agents are killed with these same weapons and others in mexico(FAST AND FURIOUS!now the republican john boehner makes a deal with holder to stop investigations of holder?darrell issa was gathering information on holder and had enough to prove holder was lying about no knowledge of this operation!boehner suddenly stops investigation of holder?john boehner is a traitor to all coservatives and if repubs. still back him they can go to hell too!i would rathjer vote for a dem. than a two faced ahole like boehner?
Bruce V

Birmingham, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 9, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

"Fast and Furious" is what obama was talking about when he told Sahara Brady that he was working "behind the scenes" to enact gun control legislation.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 9, 2012
 
Bruce V wrote:
"Fast and Furious" is what obama was talking about when he told Sahara Brady that he was working "behind the scenes" to enact gun control legislation.
Right on the money.

This will be a top priority if Obama wins four more years.
Firearms will become "a health issue".
Obama will blame American gun owners for crime around the world as the Marxist UN already does.

Inflammatory accusations work best to rally people.

Since: Nov 11

Anderson, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 9, 2012
 
I expect the people that make a living from government handouts will elect Barry again. And we can't forget the graveyard vote adding to his numbers.

I wonder if he will repeal the 22nd ammendment while he is at it? I'm sure Eric will say it is legal!

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 9, 2012
 
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Right on the money.
This will be a top priority if Obama wins four more years.
Firearms will become "a health issue".
Obama will blame American gun owners for crime around the world as the Marxist UN already does.
Inflammatory accusations work best to rally people.
NOT if we might energise a sufficiently large number of people both IN and OUT of government whom will declare that THEY =WILL NOT= obey —or abide— any such edicts.
.
Government finds validity =ONLY= when a majority of the people assent to its acts.
Bruce V

Birmingham, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 10, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Right on the money.
This will be a top priority if Obama wins four more years.
Firearms will become "a health issue".
Obama will blame American gun owners for crime around the world as the Marxist UN already does.
Inflammatory accusations work best to rally people.
I am disappointed that none of the media have connected the dots between Fast ad Furious and gun control. It is a shame that we do not have an investigative (except when it comes to investigating Conservatives) media anymore.

Think back a year or so ago when all of the gun grabbing Senators and Congressmen, and even the President of Mexico were crying for more gun control laws. Whining that poor Mexico was awash with AK-47's and AW-15's that were coming into Mexico because of the Second Amendment and "lax firearms laws" in America. And, to top it off, A.T.F. was publicly claiming that the gun grabbers were right and that all of the guns turning up in Mexico could be traced back to a few gun stores along the border. All the while knowing that IN FACT they, the A.T.F., were the true cause of the problem.

I believe that the reason Holder is stonewalling is because there are documents that prove the connection between Fast and Furious and the push for more new gun control laws and that obama is implicated in those documents; that in fact he knew of and approved of Fast and Furious.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 10, 2012
 
Bruce V wrote:
<quoted text>
I am disappointed that none of the media have connected the dots between Fast ad Furious and gun control. It is a shame that we do not have an investigative (except when it comes to investigating Conservatives) media anymore.
Think back a year or so ago when all of the gun grabbing Senators and Congressmen, and even the President of Mexico were crying for more gun control laws. Whining that poor Mexico was awash with AK-47's and AW-15's that were coming into Mexico because of the Second Amendment and "lax firearms laws" in America. And, to top it off, A.T.F. was publicly claiming that the gun grabbers were right and that all of the guns turning up in Mexico could be traced back to a few gun stores along the border. All the while knowing that IN FACT they, the A.T.F., were the true cause of the problem.
I believe that the reason Holder is stonewalling is because there are documents that prove the connection between Fast and Furious and the push for more new gun control laws and that obama is implicated in those documents; that in fact he knew of and approved of Fast and Furious.
www.foxnews.com

Front page story on former DEA chief testimony.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 10, 2012
 
Bruce V wrote:
<quoted text>
I am disappointed that none of the media have connected the dots between Fast ad Furious and gun control. It is a shame that we do not have an investigative (except when it comes to investigating Conservatives) media anymore.
Think back a year or so ago when all of the gun grabbing Senators and Congressmen, and even the President of Mexico were crying for more gun control laws. Whining that poor Mexico was awash with AK-47's and AW-15's that were coming into Mexico because of the Second Amendment and "lax firearms laws" in America. And, to top it off, A.T.F. was publicly claiming that the gun grabbers were right and that all of the guns turning up in Mexico could be traced back to a few gun stores along the border. All the while knowing that IN FACT they, the A.T.F., were the true cause of the problem.
I believe that the reason Holder is stonewalling is because there are documents that prove the connection between Fast and Furious and the push for more new gun control laws and that obama is implicated in those documents; that in fact he knew of and approved of Fast and Furious.
I agree with you 100%. There is no way an operation of this magnitude, that crosses national boundries, would have been approved at a local or even regional level. This would have taken the approval at the highest levels and possibly even the State Dept along with Justice and the White House.
Bruce V

Birmingham, AL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 10, 2012
 
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you 100%. There is no way an operation of this magnitude, that crosses national boundries, would have been approved at a local or even regional level. This would have taken the approval at the highest levels and possibly even the State Dept along with Justice and the White House.
Oh yes, I'm sure Hillery, knew about Fast and Furious; she and Billy-boy probably helped come up with the scheme.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 10, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruce V wrote:
<quoted text>
I am disappointed that none of the media have connected the dots between Fast ad Furious and gun control. It is a shame that we do not have an investigative (except when it comes to investigating Conservatives) media anymore.
Think back a year or so ago when all of the gun grabbing Senators and Congressmen, and even the President of Mexico were crying for more gun control laws. Whining that poor Mexico was awash with AK-47's and AW-15's that were coming into Mexico because of the Second Amendment and "lax firearms laws" in America. And, to top it off, A.T.F. was publicly claiming that the gun grabbers were right and that all of the guns turning up in Mexico could be traced back to a few gun stores along the border. All the while knowing that IN FACT they, the A.T.F., were the true cause of the problem.
I believe that the reason Holder is stonewalling is because there are documents that prove the connection between Fast and Furious and the push for more new gun control laws and that obama is implicated in those documents; that in fact he knew of and approved of Fast and Furious.
"I believe that the reason Holder is stonewalling is because there are documents that prove the connection between Fast and Furious and the push for more new gun control laws and that obama is implicated in those documents; that in fact he knew of and approved of Fast and Furious."
.
More it is that Issa is in collusion with the bastard, inasmuch as Bush 43 was engaged in the very same acts as the current administration.
.
And you know? YOU KNOW? ALL OF THAT was connected to 9-11-2001.
.
As soon as someone pulls the plug on that sink of sewage, the WHOLE GAME goes down, because one or another of the lower minions involved WILL SQUEAL like a stuck pig, and reveal the whole cadre for what they are.
.
Can't have ~that~ now, can we?

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Feb 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Eric Holder is a low life scum sucking pig. He’s not an American or African American he’s an African A**hole. He should be sent to Mexico where he can be with his friends in the drug cartels. The blood of innocent Americans in on his hands. His involvement in “Fast and Furious” is nothing short of treason. He’s a traitor with no respect of the United States Constitution. He should be fired, impeached and tarred and feathered.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Mar 5, 2012
 
Gun Owners of America
It’s Time for Corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder to “Pay the Piper”
GOA petitions the House Speaker to move the Gosar Resolution
It’s becoming obvious that the corrupt, virulently anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder thinks he can stonewall Congress in connection with his cover-up of the Fast & Furious Operation.
That Justice Department program sent over 2,000 illegal firearms to Mexican drug cartels, leaving over 300 Mexican nationals and two U.S. agents dead.
Yet, Holder continues to lie under oath and to stonewall Congress.
He has sent only 6,400 pages of the 83,000 documents demanded by a congressional committee -– and many of these are nothing but blackened sheets of paper. Furthermore, he has absolutely refused to provide documents which would tell Congress “what Holder knew and when did he know it”-– claiming that these are “deliberative” in nature.
He has lied under oath, testifying that he didn’t know of Fast and Furious, even though at least seven relevant memoranda had been sent to him, dating as far back as July, 2010.
And, perhaps worst of all, the House appears to be putting on the kid gloves and taking the pressure off this perjurer who continues to harass gun owners as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer.
So the time to act is now. We need to encourage House Speaker Boehner to move the Gosar resolution expressing “no confidence” in the corrupt Attorney General.
Yeah. We know. We know. It would be far better to just impeach Holder.
But we believe that House action condemning Holder would be so rare -– would garner so much press attention –- and would receive such broad support in the House -- that it would place enormous pressure on Barack Obama, in an election year, to simply push Holder out the door.
ACTION: Please sign your name to the petition provided by GOA and send it to House Speaker John Boehner. Click here to go to the Speaker's web contact form.
Forward it to your wife, your kids, your parents, your friends, and your friends’ friends,-– and have them do the same.
This is a pivotal moment in history. If Barack Obama and Eric Holder are given a “pass” on their insidious role in the murderous Fast & Furious program, many Americans who care about the Second Amendment will go into the upcoming elections with no understanding of the moral corruption of this administration -– and the consequences of that corruption, in terms of human life.
So, please, act now.
----------
PETITION TO HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER
Whereas the Justice Department’s Operation Fast and Furious resulted in over 2,000 firearms being shipped across the Mexican border to Mexican drug cartels;
Whereas Fast & Furious firearms turned up at the murder scenes of over 300 Mexican nationals -– and two Fast and Furious firearms turned up at the murder scene of U.S. Border Agent Brian Terry;
Whereas the Justice Department knew that it had neither the logistical nor the legal ability to track the Fast and Furious firearms which it was deliberately allowing to be transported to Mexican drug cartels;
Whereas, Attorney General Eric Holder testified before the House on May 3, 2011, that he had only known of Operation Fast and Furious for a “few weeks”;
Whereas CBS Evening News reported on October 3, 2011, that Attorney General Holder had received no fewer than seven memoranda on the Fast and Furious program, dating back to July, 2010;
Whereas it is not a legal defense that a principal such as Attorney General Holder deliberately ignored the written advice of his attorneys and his subordinates in a case where his ignorance resulted in over 300 murders;
Whereas Attorney General Holder has politicized the Justice Department and has brought disgrace to himself and the department he heads;
Whereas the only acceptable outcome is for Attorney General Holder to be removed from his position of trust, in anticipation of a full investigation of his criminal culpability;

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Mar 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Joe Chit wrote:
Gun Owners of America
It’s Time for Corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder to “Pay the Piper”
[--snip for brevity--]
----------
PETITION TO HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER
[--snip rest for brevity--]
Joe, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that isn't going anywhere, and the reason why is just this: Most —yes: MOST— of the members of Congress are guilty of taking bribes from AIPAC directly and Israel indirectly.
.
They =KNOW= full well that if they press the matter with Holder, that he will BOTH spill the beans, AND THEN press charges against the lot of them, causing a mass resignation crisis as well as mass arrests.
.
In truth of fact, many of them could be charged with treason.
.
So, as I keep saying: In Washington, D.C., one hand washes the other.
.
As before, everything we are seeing is nought but 'window dressing' and a grand distraction from what's really going on behind the scenes.
.
Bottom line: KEEP YOUR POWDER DRY!

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Mar 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
Joe, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that isn't going anywhere, and the reason why is just this: Most —yes: MOST— of the members of Congress are guilty of taking bribes from AIPAC directly and Israel indirectly.
.
They =KNOW= full well that if they press the matter with Holder, that he will BOTH spill the beans, AND THEN press charges against the lot of them, causing a mass resignation crisis as well as mass arrests.
.
In truth of fact, many of them could be charged with treason.
.
So, as I keep saying: In Washington, D.C., one hand washes the other.
.
As before, everything we are seeing is nought but 'window dressing' and a grand distraction from what's really going on behind the scenes.
.
Bottom line: KEEP YOUR POWDER DRY!
A Jewish conspiracy is holding back a gun smuggling investigation?

You an Fing idiot.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Mar 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>A Jewish conspiracy is holding back a gun smuggling investigation?
You an Fing idiot.
Well, the evidence speaks for itself: The Congress of the United States has been compromised by those intent upon ensuring their plans happen.
.
Remember the Iran-Contra scandal? Here's a refresher:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB210...
.
Gee, imagine that: Israel was involved in a BIG way.
.
The United States sends literally BILLIONS of U$ dollars to Israel yearly, and that money is in turn used to bribe the members of the U.S. Congress in order to make sure certain things happen which are beneficial to the Israeli government insiders.
.
Now then, because there are so many players involved in ~completely~ illegal acts, i.e., receiving funds from foreign donors, especially laundered money, then they have compromised themselves.
.
AIPAC is actually a foreign-controlled entity. They get money DIRECTLY from Israel. Anyone, and I mean =ANYONE= in elected or appointed office, or anyone running for office whom accepts money from AIPAC is guilty of engaging in the act of money laundering.
.
http://www.fatf-gafi.org/document/29/0,3746,e...
.
So now, you would accuse me of being an 'idiot.'
.
Well, in order to make sure 'things happen,' guess what happens when the compromised are suddenly advised of what will happen, should they suddenly decide to 'grow a backbone?'
.
As an aside, Barney Frank publicly told the U.S. Congressional investigators that if they didn't stop threatening him over his private life, that he would go public with all of the 'dirt' he knows about the rest of them.
.
Guess what happened? They stopped investigating him, and dropped all charges they were getting ready to press.
.
As I keep saying: In Washington, D.C., one hand washes the other.
.
So, you were saying?

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Mar 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the evidence speaks for itself: The Congress of the United States has been compromised by those intent upon ensuring their plans happen.
.
Remember the Iran-Contra scandal? Here's a refresher:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB210...
.
Gee, imagine that: Israel was involved in a BIG way.
.
The United States sends literally BILLIONS of U$ dollars to Israel yearly, and that money is in turn used to bribe the members of the U.S. Congress in order to make sure certain things happen which are beneficial to the Israeli government insiders.
.
Now then, because there are so many players involved in ~completely~ illegal acts, i.e., receiving funds from foreign donors, especially laundered money, then they have compromised themselves.
.
AIPAC is actually a foreign-controlled entity. They get money DIRECTLY from Israel. Anyone, and I mean =ANYONE= in elected or appointed office, or anyone running for office whom accepts money from AIPAC is guilty of engaging in the act of money laundering.
.
http://www.fatf-gafi.org/document/29/0,3746,e...
.
So now, you would accuse me of being an 'idiot.'
.
Well, in order to make sure 'things happen,' guess what happens when the compromised are suddenly advised of what will happen, should they suddenly decide to 'grow a backbone?'
.
As an aside, Barney Frank publicly told the U.S. Congressional investigators that if they didn't stop threatening him over his private life, that he would go public with all of the 'dirt' he knows about the rest of them.
.
Guess what happened? They stopped investigating him, and dropped all charges they were getting ready to press.
.
As I keep saying: In Washington, D.C., one hand washes the other.
.
So, you were saying?
You quoting Barney Frank speaks volumes.

Get a grip.

There is an election to win.

Any indepth investigation needs to start with the Bush administration to catch wrong doing and establish a base line.

The Republican party cannot afford to shine a bright light on themselves any more then the Democrats.

You can be pretty damn sure members of Congress are caught up in this.

You think Ron Paul is going to play Moses in a remake of the Ten Commandments.

You would be better off sticking to FEMA camps and Chem trails.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Mar 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>You quoting Barney Frank speaks volumes.
Get a grip.
There is an election to win.
Any indepth investigation needs to start with the Bush administration to catch wrong doing and establish a base line.
The Republican party cannot afford to shine a bright light on themselves any more then the Democrats.
You can be pretty damn sure members of Congress are caught up in this.
You think Ron Paul is going to play Moses in a remake of the Ten Commandments.
You would be better off sticking to FEMA camps and Chem trails.
You engage in deflection.
.
The facts speak for themselves. Avoid the truth at your own peril.
.
But other than that, you're a Romney fan, right? Or, would that fat boy liar Gingrich?
.
Anybody but Ron Paul, because he ~can't~ win, right?
.
RON PAUL 2012!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 19 of19
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••