Instead of letting the Democrats point to Bush to relate to Romney, Romney people have to make it clear,that Romney must say he does not see to the same views of Bush .
And then Bush was just one other former Republican, and Romney is concerned most every business acted upon alike by Obama instead.
Obama has made a very troublesome mess (including the economics and illegal migrants mismanagement.)
Now Obama is implementing Bush agenda in the same way.
What foreign policy experience does OBAMA HAVE by DOING WRONG ALL THE TIME?
Since Obama does the stands wrongly related to China, North Korea, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, linkage to allies, and US footing around the globe, it is time to change for the better good, without Obama. Obama has done more wrong and destruction, more than Bush did.
The fact is that Obama has used Bush failure foreign policy as his major frame platform, but made worse failures than Bush: There are more economic damaging ensembles done by Obama as of now, than people can realize , for there are much more than that indeed.
Tentatively, Romney people would have some outlines for transcending the foreign policy versus Obama‘s foreign policy:
----------FOR ROMNEY PEOPLE to do---Obama has not told his explicit purpose in what he is doing in his foreign policy. Basically Romney can say the goal, objective and purpose are to sustain US image of freedom conductivity (spreading freedom) around the world, and enhance the positioning of protecting and standing for people freedom on world stage in conjunction with whatever economic interests, whereas Obama does not do that, nor Bush or Clinton.
-----China---China would slow its growth of economy sooner or later. Like his mentor Bush, Obama keeps on borrowing , giving business to China and buying Chinese goods , which are becoming expensive. There needs to cut trade debts to China substantially as they are too large. US must upkeep its military strength flourishing to Pacific Asia, pulling India, Australia, South Korea and Japan as allies, and tie them to build the possible missile defense standpoint facing China, in order to stand for freedom world.
These countries should have forefront sufficiency in their military providing for combat for contingency in case.
US should not encourage travellers and students to come to US with wide-open borders for whatever reasons or give or train them in skills, and then call them as a COMPETITOR as Obama and Bush WOULD do so. US already has a large population and sufficient work force. Obama’s open-border policy invites vast schemes of frauds, and fraudulent people already located in US now. This will degrade the productivity as people of no real ability by using false credentials take vital positions of employment. And they would also sell out US interests. US should serve as a watchdog of China in Asia and the globe as a whole.
-----North Korea and Iran ---Unlike Obama’s way of using China to get in by using his mentor Bush method, go for a bilateral or unilateral arrangement with both countries in engaging to get to, as the approach, to make progress. Although having a tough stand, wars are not necessary if not needed. Possibly South Korea may be included in the North Korea matter, but not China and Russia.
-----Afghanistan--- Use minimum military to stand by to this time, and withdraw if necessary , and oversee Pakistan for getting data and information in that region.
----Russia---- Conduct dialogue with Russia to exercise the stand of discussing what Russia is up to , in the region, and around the world and proceed to re-evaluate or develop if a missile defense system would be worthwhile, relating to the costs as well. Russia has upgraded its military and other technologies.
It is possible that Russia can also develop such system in the long run.
-----NATO ---Keep up to confer and consult with each other.