Federal Marriage Amendment Re-introduced in Senate

Judged:

5

4

3

Bud wrote:

<quoted text>
Translation: Neph has no substantive response.

Judged:

2

1

1

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>Isn't that cute, Bud is handing out judgeiticons. Deceive and distract Bud. Does it bother your fragile ego when no one buys you tactics, or does your narcissistic nature shield you from such thoughts?

Judged:

2

1

1

Mort wrote:

<quoted text>
No homosexual relationshit shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relaitonshit is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationshit:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationshit, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society. No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be GLBT anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationshit, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationshit can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

Judged:

4

1

1

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>Isn't that cute, Bud is handing out judgeiticons. Deceive and distract Bud. Does it bother your fragile ego when no one buys you tactics, or does your narcissistic nature shield you from such thoughts?

Judged:

2

2

2

Bud wrote:

<quoted text>
What does this have to do with the topic under discussion?
Are you pathologically incapable of conducting a debate? On a mission to prove how immature you are and how much you are willing to divert attention away from your inability to respond? What?
If you have an argument to make, bring it. Otherwise you are just a troll.

Judged:

1

1

1

Josh in New Orleans wrote:

<quoted text>
I have a right to not be discriminated against on the basis of my gender, yet the state will tell me I cannot marry my partner because I am not the correct gender.

Judged:

2

2

2

Carlos wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no logical reason for the government to be involved in any legal homosexual relationship, much less to call them a "marriage."
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be GLBT anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

Judged:

4

2

2

Carlos wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no logical reason for the government to be involved in any legal homosexual relationship, much less to call them a "marriage."
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be GLBT anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

Judged:

2

2

1

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>It has every topic you get involved in. If a response does not fit your agenda, your tactic is to divert peoples attentions away from what you don't want them to see. A perfect example is changing the topic. Which is specificaly what I pointed out earlier. The problem is there are a lot of sheep out there that just buy into your deception. We just saw a perfect example of that.