Palin talks economic worries in Appalachian Ohio

Date: Oct 12, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Obama on Nov 1 2007 explaining socialism to a 7 yr old
Body: Four thousand supporters turned out for a rally with Senator Barack Obama in Durham, North Carolina, on Thursday. The Democratic presidential candidate said he would not take any questions, but he relented when a five-year-old girl named Hadassah Jones broke into tears.
She was there as a correspondent for brandnewz. com.

According to the Associated Press story, Senator Obama gave the little girl a brief explanation of his plan for universal health insurance coverage and improved education.
Then he explained his view that the wealthy should pay the expenses of people who are not wealthy:

"We've got to make sure that people who have more money help the people who have less money," Sen. Obama said.
"If you had a whole pizza, and your friend had no pizza, would you give him a slice?"

Oh, my. He should have stuck to his plan to take no questions.

Senator Obama glossed right over the difference between a moral imperative to be kind to people and government force that throws people in jail if they refuse to pay up.

When a presidential candidate says "We've got to make sure," that is the language of government force.

Maybe the senator should have explained it to Hadassah this way:

"If you had a whole pizza, and your friend had no pizza, should you be expelled from school if you refuse to give him a slice?"

Or maybe he should have explained it this way:

"If your mommy and daddy worked very hard at their jobs and went to school at night so they could make enough money to give you everything you need, should they have to give that money to all the parents who dropped out of school and wasted their time, and to all the parents who spent their money on things that your parents passed up so they could support you?"

Or maybe he could have explained it this way:

"If you build a lemonade stand and buy lemons and sugar and pitchers and cups and stand out in the hot sun all day selling lemonade, and at the end of the day you have fifteen dollars, whose money is that? Is the answer the same if it's only two dollars? What if it's fifty dollars?"

This is not an argument over giving away a slice of pizza. This is an argument about the morality of collectivism. When Senator Obama, and almost all other politicians, make their arguments for fairness and compassion, they are advocating not voluntary charitable giving, but government confiscation of some people's property for the benefit of other people, chosen by the government on the basis of need, or perhaps voting record.

Do the fruits of your labor belong to you, or do they belong to the people who most need them?

And if they belong to the people who most need them, are you a slave to the needs of people you don't know and can't control?

Collectivism is not the opposite of capitalism. It's the opposite of freedom.

Even a five-year-old should know that.

NOW COME ON PEOPLE, THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVE JOBS AND WORK HARD FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT?????? NO WONDER THEY ARE BUSSING POOR PEOPLE TO VOTE!!!!!!!

Does anyone know the definition of SOCIALISM..Barrack Hussein Obama proudly supports SOCIALISM.

Palin talks and you post about Obama? Is she so dim-witted you can't support her speech?

Talk about pandering - she gets in coal country and it's "Mine baby, mine".

wrong wrote:

Date: Oct 12, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Obama on Nov 1 2007 explaining socialism to a 7 yr old
Body: Four thousand supporters turned out for a rally with Senator Barack Obama in Durham, North Carolina, on Thursday. The Democratic presidential candidate said he would not take any questions, but he relented when a five-year-old girl named Hadassah Jones broke into tears.
She was there as a correspondent for brandnewz. com.
According to the Associated Press story, Senator Obama gave the little girl a brief explanation of his plan for universal health insurance coverage and improved education.
Then he explained his view that the wealthy should pay the expenses of people who are not wealthy:
"We've got to make sure that people who have more money help the people who have less money," Sen. Obama said.
"If you had a whole pizza, and your friend had no pizza, would you give him a slice?"
Oh, my. He should have stuck to his plan to take no questions.
Senator Obama glossed right over the difference between a moral imperative to be kind to people and government force that throws people in jail if they refuse to pay up.
When a presidential candidate says "We've got to make sure," that is the language of government force.
Maybe the senator should have explained it to Hadassah this way:
"If you had a whole pizza, and your friend had no pizza, should you be expelled from school if you refuse to give him a slice?"
Or maybe he should have explained it this way:
"If your mommy and daddy worked very hard at their jobs and went to school at night so they could make enough money to give you everything you need, should they have to give that money to all the parents who dropped out of school and wasted their time, and to all the parents who spent their money on things that your parents passed up so they could support you?"
Or maybe he could have explained it this way:
"If you build a lemonade stand and buy lemons and sugar and pitchers and cups and stand out in the hot sun all day selling lemonade, and at the end of the day you have fifteen dollars, whose money is that? Is the answer the same if it's only two dollars? What if it's fifty dollars?"
This is not an argument over giving away a slice of pizza. This is an argument about the morality of collectivism. When Senator Obama, and almost all other politicians, make their arguments for fairness and compassion, they are advocating not voluntary charitable giving, but government confiscation of some people's property for the benefit of other people, chosen by the government on the basis of need, or perhaps voting record.
Do the fruits of your labor belong to you, or do they belong to the people who most need them?
And if they belong to the people who most need them, are you a slave to the needs of people you don't know and can't control?
Collectivism is not the opposite of capitalism. It's the opposite of freedom.
Even a five-year-old should know that.
NOW COME ON PEOPLE, THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVE JOBS AND WORK HARD FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT?????? NO WONDER THEY ARE BUSSING POOR PEOPLE TO VOTE!!!!!!!

Let me guess. Someone sent you this as an email.

wrong wrote:

Date: Oct 12, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Obama on Nov 1 2007 explaining socialism to a 7 yr old
Body: Four thousand supporters turned out for a rally with Senator Barack Obama in Durham, North Carolina, on Thursday. The Democratic presidential candidate said he would not take any questions, but he relented when a five-year-old girl named Hadassah Jones broke into tears.
She was there as a correspondent for brandnewz. com.
According to the Associated Press story, Senator Obama gave the little girl a brief explanation of his plan for universal health insurance coverage and improved education.
Then he explained his view that the wealthy should pay the expenses of people who are not wealthy:
"We've got to make sure that people who have more money help the people who have less money," Sen. Obama said.
"If you had a whole pizza, and your friend had no pizza, would you give him a slice?"
Oh, my. He should have stuck to his plan to take no questions.
Senator Obama glossed right over the difference between a moral imperative to be kind to people and government force that throws people in jail if they refuse to pay up.
When a presidential candidate says "We've got to make sure," that is the language of government force.
Maybe the senator should have explained it to Hadassah this way:
"If you had a whole pizza, and your friend had no pizza, should you be expelled from school if you refuse to give him a slice?"
Or maybe he should have explained it this way:
"If your mommy and daddy worked very hard at their jobs and went to school at night so they could make enough money to give you everything you need, should they have to give that money to all the parents who dropped out of school and wasted their time, and to all the parents who spent their money on things that your parents passed up so they could support you?"
Or maybe he could have explained it this way:
"If you build a lemonade stand and buy lemons and sugar and pitchers and cups and stand out in the hot sun all day selling lemonade, and at the end of the day you have fifteen dollars, whose money is that? Is the answer the same if it's only two dollars? What if it's fifty dollars?"
This is not an argument over giving away a slice of pizza. This is an argument about the morality of collectivism. When Senator Obama, and almost all other politicians, make their arguments for fairness and compassion, they are advocating not voluntary charitable giving, but government confiscation of some people's property for the benefit of other people, chosen by the government on the basis of need, or perhaps voting record.
Do the fruits of your labor belong to you, or do they belong to the people who most need them?
And if they belong to the people who most need them, are you a slave to the needs of people you don't know and can't control?
Collectivism is not the opposite of capitalism. It's the opposite of freedom.
Even a five-year-old should know that.
NOW COME ON PEOPLE, THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVE JOBS AND WORK HARD FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT?????? NO WONDER THEY ARE BUSSING POOR PEOPLE TO VOTE!!!!!!!

One of the better posts explaining Obama's socialistic views.

It's easy to spot a fake.

New American Standard Bible (1995) Proverbs 16:30
"He who winks his eyes does so to devise perverse things; He who compresses his lips brings evil to pass."

The word PERVERSE means turned away from what is right or good : corrupt

PALIN IS A FAKE CHRISTIAN! Bush, Chaney, McCain they all wink. You noticed how Bush compresses his lips.

she is as worthless at teets on a nun.

Date: Oct 12, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Obama on Nov 1 2007 explaining socialism to a 7 yr old..........

I'm with you Wrong. 2.9 trillion in taxes and no accountability whatsoever. It's just a way to get votes amongst the poor and the stupid. Had a guy tell me the other day, "I'm voting for Obama for that "free healthcare." Yea show me a government program that has the standards and accountabilities of that of the big business bad guy. And forget to tell the stupid that the rich business employing you pays way more in taxes than he gets for a profit. and after all if all his profits goes to taxes where is his incentive to work and employ your sorry bu#t? And forget the democratic runs schools that are run soo good and doing the poor so good in the inner cities.. or the great government run veterens hospitals. I cannot believe America can fall for that socialism attitude. All government programs bankrupt. They have no incentive and we are stuck with them with no choice to go elsewhere. I bet Bill Gates making all that money and helping the world turns out much better for the good of the whole than any government program ever did, other than our military which is the presidents number 1 job..

This person posts the same comment with the same misspelled word Mabey, so is that cut and paste? Who would make the same typo every time? Is this person a racist, a panderer to racists, or a paid operative? He/she/it - is it a robo-racist - is moving along at a fast clip from topic to topic. Once in a while there is a little variety, but not much. I guess the Acorn bit is the message for the day, or the week. I have had too much caffeine, and am following this creature around and complaining. Guy Noir,. private detective? Or Nancy Drew, maybe!

Wrong and afraid very,very afraid.
This article in Scientific American explains some of the unreasonable fear demonstrated in the above posts.

http://www.sciam.com/blog/60-second-science/p...

The "wrong" post is a text book example of Psychological warfare.Trying to instill fear in American citizens is terrorism. So, the author of "Wrong's" post is a domestic terrorist.

nobama wants us all to live in a socialist country... every one except him...

cant for the life of me understand why you nobama supporters cant see through his fake smile...

if you vote nobama in, your going to see some change you may not like... 2 classes of people, extremely rich and extremely poor...

well, anyone who does not agree, has obviously never had to humble themselves to ask for any kind of help from the government, and no, that does not mean that you are a lazy highschool drop out that doesnt work! HAHAHA totally rediculous!!