'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

Judged:

2

1

American Lady wrote:

<quoted text>

Like this FOOL:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

1

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Is there an echo in here??

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
**********
Who is this lowlife Canadian? He or she should stay on their side of the border and worry about what's going on up there. They don't live here, they don't deal with American issues, and if they have nothing to contribute other than blasphemous remarks, I probably would have said this and ended with KMA!!!
As for copy and paste. If you do some don't like it, if you don't you get accused of not having a reliable source. So copy and paste is easier. You didn't say it, but you want others to read it without you having to leave half of it out. I have no problem with someone applying a source to their opinion. In a way it has more credibility. A chat board like this is a great way to exchange ideas, bring forth some things you may not be aware of: enlighten and challenge. There is nothing wrong with a good debate, but if you call me an a$$ most likely I will return with a comment.
This comment to you: "All together, you don't amount to a pile of fresh farm manure." Shows ignorance and immaturity. Consider the source!!!

American Lady wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks Jay!
I know :)

Judged:

1

1

American Lady wrote:

Issa suing Holder over 'Fast and Furious'
For refusing to provide documents in fatal operation
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/issa-suing-holder-...
Darrell Issa to Sue Eric Holder Monday
By Jonathan Strong
Roll Call Staff
Aug. 12, 2012, 7:43 p.m.
House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa plans to sue Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday for refusing to provide documents related to the "Fast and Furious" gun-smuggling operation.
"The committee expects to file the civil contempt suit against the attorney general Monday," a Republican source said. The suit will be filed in the federal district court for the District of Columbia.
http://www.rollcall.com/news/darrell_issa_to_...

Judged:

3

3

john wrote:

<quoted text>...some articles are saying, the drug lord caught, is talking a lot. saying, its not about "gun running" as much, rather holder traded guns for information. there are more and more info daily. that the truth is, trading info for guns.

Romney Ryan 2013 wrote:

<quoted text>
The way Holder tells it he didn't have a clue so I guess he didn't get any info since he knew nothing about f&f. Whoever got the info was duped because they sure didn't get info that those guns would be used to kill the Border Patrol guy. Nothing is ever the fault of Obama and this crooked bunch on the Hill. I can't wait til the whole lot of them are gone and forgotten. Come on November and lets put the trash on the curb and get America back to being America!

American Lady wrote:

Manifesto puts Hillary chief in Saudi plot
Huma Abedin worked for family institute tied to establishing Islamic America
Although President Obama lavishly praised her over the weekend as an “American patriot,” a manifesto commissioned by the ruling Saudi Arabian monarchy effectively places the work of an institute that employed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the forefront of a grand plan to mobilize U.S. Muslim minorities to transform America into a Saudi-style Islamic state, according to an Arabic-language researcher.
Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, was an assistant editor for a dozen years for the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs for the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs. The institute – founded by her late father and currently directed by her mother – is backed by the Muslim World League, an Islamic organization found in the Saudi holy city of Mecca that was founded by Muslim Brotherhood leaders.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/manifesto-puts-hil...

Romney Ryan 2013 wrote:

<quoted text>
The way Holder tells it he didn't have a clue so I guess he didn't get any info since he knew nothing about f&f. Whoever got the info was duped because they sure didn't get info that those guns would be used to kill the Border Patrol guy. Nothing is ever the fault of Obama and this crooked bunch on the Hill. I can't wait til the whole lot of them are gone and forgotten. Come on November and lets put the trash on the curb and get America back to being America!

American Lady wrote:

Mitt's 'damn-the-torpedoes!' decision
Pat Buchanan calls Paul Ryan 'a man of principles and conservative philosophy'
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/mitts-damn-the-tor...
Rush: Economy to rocket with Ryan win
'The moment it's known that Obama's out of office'
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/rush-economy-to-ro...

Judged:

3

3

1

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, yes, yes all I'm saying when he had a chance to use Gov't money given to him he accepted and put it use as he should! Why would he now want the Gov't to stop doing the same for others? I think it’s a reasonable question ...

Judged:

2

1

1

whitehair wrote:

<quoted text>
Frank--It really is very simple.Congress made the laws.The SS# simply follows the rules.Ryan was just a young boy,his father passed away,,his Mother gave him the check the rule and laws gave her,for his up bringing.This is set up for all citizens.No, really it was established for the citizens that paid into it,not so sure any longer this applies.But you ,being a liberal,can find nothig wrong with this!The fact he saved that money and later used it to pay for his education,indicates a young man with greater intelligence and ability,with the foresight,than most.Thre surely can be no reason to question this.
Now the fact is,we are projecting into what Romney and Ryan will do with SS# and medicare.They have only begun to rationalize into this and Congress would have to question and discuss the best they can,as to that outcome.No matter what they come up with,it would be for the people and the best the gov`t could come up with.It would certainly be better than ObamaCare.Obamacare helps a few,hurts many,and certainly is unafordable.We,our Country,can not sustain more debt.
Now one more thing--if the laws and rules are here,made by previous leaders,and are there for the living ones at the time,should they not be used,and should they not be corrected as they find out needed changes.?
You fuss at Romney for using the rules and laws to avoid taxes.Why should these not be used.?We all do.They were put in for that purpose.Now that they have been used for years,is there a problem with changing the laws and rules,since we are learning they do not do the good intended?Should the loopholes we all know about not be used?Or,should thy be reconsidered,and perhaps done away withCongress will find it very hard to eliminate these as they also use them.Lobbysts,and special interests also should be removed,but will and liberal,or conservative do it?Not likely.It is now stated there are 90,000 pages to the tax law.I thought it was 18,000 but what do I know?Anyway,a simple tax code,a flat tax ,would eliminate all the need for personal reporting and seem to be better than now.

Judged:

2

1

1

whitehair wrote:

There is a difference between wanting to change the way things work,and wanting to do away with the item altogether..If you swing a hammer and hurt your finger,do you give up the hammer or change your swing.?
My retirement is from my own investment(an annuity) as well as SS#.Now why would any simpleton want to do away with a good thing?But if that could be done better,what is wrong with a change for the better?.Just because you can not make the change,or,just because you might be cut off due to no need or paying into it,is no reason for the Country to continue!
You have failed the test of reading the proposals being made!!!

Judged:

1

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
**********
Frank --- I have been reading his web site, it's huge and takes time to go through it all, but I don't see anywhere where he says he doesn't want the same as he got for others. What he's saying and he is right is, we will not be able to sustain the path we are taking. Too many people on government aid, all kinds of government aid. Billion/Trillions all coming from people busting butt to make a living for themselves and their families. You can't keep taking from the haves and giving to the have-nots, it's resented by those who work hard and find it almost impossible to keep up themselves.
Obama wants to print money as we need it. He wants to legalize 1.8 million illegals to compete with those out job hunting now - and I know several people doing this right now - and the most they can get is part time. Who can live on four hours a day's salary?!! That puts these people on government assistance. And we go round and round spinning our wheels!
You folks who want to tax the small businesses scare them into not wanting to hire for fear that they won't be able to maintain their businesses. And if they can't they simply lay off and double the work load on those who are there. This is the real world, not the multi-multi- millionaires lifestyle these other folks live in.
What is it about we can't keep growing government and expect to ever get out of debt that some people just don't get? You and I can only spend up to our credit card limit. After that we pay huge penalties or we just ask for a few thousand more on the card to cover our over spending going further and further in debt. It's so simple. Government is doing this every minute of the day. Where do you think this kind of illogic spending is going to take us? Do you not worry about this?