'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

The Obama administration has almost certainly engaged in the most shockingly vile corruption scandal in the history of the country.
Administration officials intentionally put guns into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, so that when the guns taken from Mexican crime scenes turned out to be American guns, Democrats would have a reason to crack down on gun sellers in the United States.

Democrats will never stop trying to take our guns away. But since their party was thrown out of Congress for the first time in nearly half a century as a result of passing the 1994 "assault weapons ban," even liberals know they were going to need a really good argument to pass any limitation on guns ever again.

So it's curious that Democrats all started telling the same lie about guns as soon as Obama became president. In March 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced to reporters on a trip to Mexico: "Since we know that the vast majority, 90 percent of that weaponry (used by Mexican drug cartels), comes from our country, we are going to try to stop it from getting there in the first place."

As she sentimentally elaborated on Fox News' Greta Van Susteren show: "The guns sold in the United States, which are illegal in Mexico, get smuggled and shipped across our border and arm these terrible drug-dealing criminals so that they can outgun these poor police officers along the border and elsewhere in Mexico."

Suddenly that 90 percent statistic was everywhere. It was like the statistic on women beaten by their husbands on Super Bowl Sunday.

CBS' Bob Schieffer asked Obama on "Face the Nation": "It's my understanding that 90 percent of the guns that they're getting down in Mexico are coming from the United States. We don't seem to be doing a very good job of cutting off the gun flow. Do you need any kind of legislative help on that front? Have you, for example, thought about asking Congress to reinstate the ban on assault weapons?"

At a Senate hearing, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said: "It is unacceptable to have 90 percent of the guns that are picked up in Mexico and used to shoot judges, police officers and mayors ... come from the United States."

And then, thanks to Fox News -- the first network to report it -- we found out the 90 percent figure was complete bunkum. It was a fabrication told by William Hoover, of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATF), and then spread like wildfire by Democrats and the media.

Mexican law enforcement authorities send only a fraction of the guns they recover from criminals back to the U.S. for tracing. Which guns do they send? The guns that have U.S. serial numbers on them. It would be like asking a library to produce all their Mark Twain books and then concluding that 90 percent of the books in that library are by Mark Twain.

You begin to see why the left hates Fox News so much. The left hates the truth.

Obama backed away from the preposterous 90 percent claim. His National Security Council spokesman explained to Fox News that by "recovered," they meant "guns traceable to the United States." So, in other words, Democrats were frantically citing the amazing fact that almost all the guns traceable to the U.S. were ... traceable to the U.S.

Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters that even if the percentage is inaccurate, the "vast majority" of guns seized in crimes in Mexico come from the United States.(And he should know, because it turns out he was sending them there!)

This was absurd. Most of the guns used by drug cartels are automatic weapons -- not to mention shoulder-fired rockets -- that can't be sold to most Americans. They are acquired from places like Russia, China and Guatemala.

Right about the time the 90 percent lie was unraveling, the Obama administration decided to directly hand thousands of American guns over to Mexican criminals. Apart from the fact that tracking thousands of guns into Mexico is not feasible or rational, the dumped guns didn't have GPS tracing devices on them, anyway. There is no conceivable law enforcement objective to such a program.

This is what we know:

(1) Liberals thought it would be a great argument for gun control if American guns were ending up in the hands of Mexican criminals;

(2) They wanted that to be true so badly, Democrats lied about it;

(3) After they were busted on their lie, the Obama administration began dumping thousands of guns in the hands of Mexican criminals.

We also know that hundreds of people were murdered with these U.S.-government-supplied guns, including at least one American, U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

(Contrary to more Democrat lies, there was no program to dump thousands of guns in Mexico under George W. Bush. The Bush administration did have a program that put GPS trackers on about 100 guns in order to actually trace them. That operation was ended almost as soon as it began because of the lack of cooperation from Mexican officials. You may as well say Holder's program was "started" by the first cop who ever put tracer dye on contraband.)

No one has explained what putting 2,500 untraceable guns in the hands of Mexican drug dealers was supposed to accomplish.

But you know what that might have accomplished? It would make the Democrats' lie retroactively true -- allowing them to push for the same gun restrictions they were planning when they first concocted it. A majority of guns recovered from Mexican criminals would, at last, be American guns, because Eric Holder had put them there.

Unfortunately for the Democrats, some brave whistleblower inside the government leaked details of this monstrous scheme. As soon as Congress and the public demanded answers, Holder clammed up. He just says "oops" -- and accuses Republicans of racism.

Democrats that hate Fox News have something to hide and don’t want it made public.

What ever we the people do ? come Nov vote Obama out and liberal pieces of back stabbing lunatics.

Sarah wrote:

Obama backed away from the preposterous 90 percent claim. His National Security Council spokesman explained to Fox News that by "recovered," they meant "guns traceable to the United States." So, in other words, Democrats were frantically citing the amazing fact that almost all the guns traceable to the U.S. were ... traceable to the U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters that even if the percentage is inaccurate, the "vast majority" of guns seized in crimes in Mexico come from the United States.(And he should know, because it turns out he was sending them there!)
(Contrary to more Democrat lies, there was no program to dump thousands of guns in Mexico under George W. Bush. The Bush administration did have a program that put GPS trackers on about 100 guns in order to actually trace them. That operation was ended almost as soon as it began because of the lack of cooperation from Mexican officials. You may as well say Holder's program was "started" by the first cop who ever put tracer dye on contraband.)
No one has explained what putting 2,500 untraceable guns in the hands of Mexican drug dealers was supposed to accomplish.
But you know what that might have accomplished? It would make the Democrats' lie retroactively true -- allowing them to push for the same gun restrictions they were planning when they first concocted it. A majority of guns recovered from Mexican criminals would, at last, be American guns, because Eric Holder had put them there.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, some brave whistleblower inside the government leaked details of this monstrous scheme. As soon as Congress and the public demanded answers, Holder clammed up. He just says "oops" -- and accuses Republicans of racism.
Democrats that hate Fox News have something to hide and don’t want it made public.

The serious issue before us tonight is the cause for which the Democratic Party has stood in its finest hours, the cause that keeps our Party young and makes it, in the second century of its age, the largest political Party in this republic and the longest lasting political Party on this planet.
Our cause has been, since the days of Thomas Jefferson, the cause of the common man and the common woman.
Our commitment has been, since the days of Andrew Jackson, to all those he called "the humble members of society -- the farmers, mechanics, and laborers." On this foundation we have defined our values, refined our policies, and refreshed our faith.
-
The President, the Vice President, the members of Congress have a medical plan that meets their needs in full, and whenever senators and representatives catch a little cold, the Capitol physician will see them immediately, treat them promptly, fill a prescription on the spot. We do not get a bill even if we ask for it, and when do you think was the last time a member of Congress asked for a bill from the Federal Government? And I say again, as I have before, if health insurance is good enough for the President, the Vice President, the Congress of the United States, then it's good enough for you and every family in America.
--
I have a word for you coming fron my fourth grader, he came home from school and said, dad, did you know Fox news is not really the news, but rather something called propaganda?
--
If voters are searching for the truth I think the candidate in this short you tube clip is the way to go.
http://youtu.be/rsCmiFcRyIc

gdamit we go for broke if possibile vote Ron Paul

The American Voter wrote:

<quoted text>
The President, the Vice President, the members of Congress have a medical plan that meets their needs in full, and whenever senators and representatives catch a little cold, the Capitol physician will see them immediately, treat them promptly, fill a prescription on the spot. We do not get a bill even if we ask for it, and when do you think was the last time a member of Congress asked for a bill from the Federal Government? And I say again, as I have before, if health insurance is good enough for the President, the Vice President, the Congress of the United States, then it's good enough for you and every family in America.

lol, if Obamacare is good enough to be forced upon the American people, why then does Congress, the President and their families and staffs all have exemptions from it?
Not to mention special exemptions for certain employers (Democrat campaign donors), as well as Unions and other special interest groups.

WakeUp wrote:

<quoted text>
lol, if Obamacare is good enough to be forced upon the American people, why then does Congress, the President and their families and staffs all have exemptions from it?
Not to mention special exemptions for certain employers (Democrat campaign donors), as well as Unions and other special interest groups.

http://youtu.be/rsCmiFcRyIc

Here, let Mitt explain it to you.

---http://youtu.be/rsCmiFcRyIc

WakeUp wrote:

<quoted text>
lol, if Obamacare is good enough to be forced upon the American people, why then does Congress, the President and their families and staffs all have exemptions from it?
Not to mention special exemptions for certain employers (Democrat campaign donors), as well as Unions and other special interest groups.

Here, let Mitt explain it to you,

--

http://youtu.be/rsCmiFcRyIc

WakeUp wrote:

<quoted text>
lol, if Obamacare is good enough to be forced upon the American people, why then does Congress, the President and their families and staffs all have exemptions from it?
Not to mention special exemptions for certain employers (Democrat campaign donors), as well as Unions and other special interest groups.

Now you can get treatment for your shit for brains disorder.

lmfao

Holder is protecting the NRA. When we talk about the violence that has left nearly 50,000 dead in Mexico over the past five years, we usually focus on Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel, or the Juárez cartel, but it may be time to include the U.S. National Rifle Association cartel.
Granted, the 4.3 million-member NRA — the most powerful pro-gun rights lobbying group in Washington — is not in the drug trafficking business.
But judging from what Mexican President Felipe Calderón said earlier this week during a joint news conference with President Barack Obama in Washington, and from what U.S. gun control groups state, the NRA and other U.S. gun owners’ rights organizations have a huge tacit responsibility in the bloodshed that is taking place in Mexico.
The NRA and other gun lobby groups consistently block efforts to restrict the massive sale of high-power assault weapons across the border, which end up in the cartels’ hands, they say. In particular, Calderón cited the gun lobby-supported U.S. decision to lift a ban on assault weapons that expired in 2004. Calderón said he spent much of the time during his meeting with Obama on Monday urging him to seek a restoration of the ban.
“It’s been shown that when there is an excessive, quick availability of weapons in any given society, there is an increase in violence,” Calderón said at the joint news conference after their meeting.“The expiration of the assault weapons ban in the year 2004 coincided almost exactly with the beginning of the harshest period of violence we’ve ever seen.
“During my government, we have seized over 140,000 weapons in four years. And I think that the vast majority have been assault weapons, AK-57s, etc. And many, the vast majority of these weapons, were sold in gun shops in the United States,” Calderón said, adding that there are an estimated 8,000 gun shops along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Calderón did not mention the NRA by name, but leading Mexican activists are pointing at it as one of the main obstacles to reducing the mass killings in their country.
Why is Holder protecting the NRA by refusing to turn over documents? When we talk about the violence that has left nearly 50,000 dead in Mexico over the past five years, we usually focus on Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel, or the Juárez cartel, but it may be time to include the U.S. National Rifle Association cartel.
Granted, the 4.3 million-member NRA — the most powerful pro-gun rights lobbying group in Washington — is not in the drug trafficking business.
But judging from what Mexican President Felipe Calderón said earlier this week during a joint news conference with President Barack Obama in Washington, and from what U.S. gun control groups state, the NRA and other U.S. gun owners’ rights organizations have a huge tacit responsibility in the bloodshed that is taking place in Mexico.
The NRA and other gun lobby groups consistently block efforts to restrict the massive sale of high-power assault weapons across the border, which end up in the cartels’ hands, they say.“During my government, we have seized over 140,000 weapons in four years. And I think that the vast majority have been assault weapons, AK-57s, etc. And many, the vast majority of these weapons, were sold in gun shops in the United States,” Calderón said, adding that there are an estimated 8,000 gun shops along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Calderón did not mention the NRA by name, but leading Mexican activists are pointing at it as one of the main obstacles to reducing the mass killings in their country.

WakeUp wrote:

<quoted text>
lol, if Obamacare is good enough to be forced upon the American people, why then does Congress, the President and their families and staffs all have exemptions from it?
Not to mention special exemptions for certain employers (Democrat campaign donors), as well as Unions and other special interest groups.

Go for broke, demand single payer!

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
******
Agree. The Chief Justice has called this a tax. That means exactly what the word defines. Taxes will go up for everyone in the trillions. No one is getting anything for nothing in spite of what some people believe. Nothing is free! All of us old enough to understand even a little bit of how government works know this.
Medical aid as in health care will be rationed and decided by bureaucrats sitting around a table deciding if you are worthy or not of the treatment your doctor recommends. If these non-medical government hired agents decide you are not worth it, you will be denied. Case in point: a local pediatrician was treating a little girl for a broken arm. Not your typical cracked bone, but a complicated double fracture with splinters. He determined she needed a special type cast which costs twice that of an average cast for a simple break. The government insurance agent decided that it cost too much for this type of cast and he should just treat her with a typical style cast. In other words, they went against the pediatrician's warning that this is not in his patient's best interest. And certainly not in her best interest for her broken bones to heal properly. Denied again. This is what you get with socialized medical care.
Those of you who do not have the health care you think you will get with the Obamacare, and who are hoorahing right now are in for a big surprise.

A Banner Day for the President, the Decision Preserves Obama’s Historic Legacy of the Presidency!
So now our scrambling friends, the GOPers, are whining about a new tax on an unsuspecting public which will surely ruin the country, how pathetic! The fact is 94 percent of the affected population will not face a requirement to newly purchase insurance or pay a fine. Of the 181 million Americans under the age of 65 who are subject to the mandate, 86 percent are estimated to have health insurance without reform. 95 percent of those with some type of insurance coverage (employer or public) without reform, will have the same type of coverage. You should also ask yourself why medical costs in the US are twice of they are in any other modern, industrialized country – it’s all Obama’s fault is not the answer!

Taxes. That’s how we pay the bills for the benefits we (government) share. What’s the big deal? It’s hardly a scandal.

Hello wrote:

<quoted text>
Bonnie & Clyde

How Issa's Committee Lied About Fast & Furious To Lead to Holder ...
13 hours ago ... There are 7 different groups along the southwest border with the job of ... In the
Phoenix area alone, there are 853 federally licensed firearms ...

http://www.politicususa.com/issas-committee-l ...-
Your NRA is #1 terroist organization in the world!

All the little bratty democrats that walked out over the Holder contempt vote basically said "F*ck the dead guy and his family. Our fellow corrupt politician is more important than your dead son could ever be".

Didn't the dumb ass democrats learn anything about snot-nosed kiddie political walk-outs after Wisconsin voters put a hurting on the dems asses this year? Bang your drums, sing kumbaya, party in the streets, celebrate, walk ou in protest...how's that been working out for you mental giants? LMMFAO!

Darryl Washington wrote:

Taxes. That’s how we pay the bills for the benefits we (government) share. What’s the big deal? It’s hardly a scandal.

But according to our president and his right hand man, Pelosi...this isn't a tax! Are you calling Obama and Pelosi liars? Be careful! Lying to every American and cheating the citizens is no big deal but saying anything bad about the messiah is a BFD! Better protest and walkout of these topix talks and save yourself! LMMFAO!
Morons!

see ya in Nov wrote:

All the little bratty democrats that walked out over the Holder contempt vote basically said "F*ck the dead guy and his family. Our fellow corrupt politician is more important than your dead son could ever be".
Didn't the dumb ass democrats learn anything about snot-nosed kiddie political walk-outs after Wisconsin voters put a hurting on the dems asses this year? Bang your drums, sing kumbaya, party in the streets, celebrate, walk ou in protest...how's that been working out for you mental giants? LMMFAO!

U.S. Gun Trial Echoes in Drug-Torn Mexico - WSJ.com
Mar 2, 2009 ... An Arizona gun shop goes on trial in what is seen as a landmark case against
gun ... The gun store's owner, 47-year-old George Iknadosian, has ... declared
that the firearm was for personal use, but instead passed it along to ...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1235950127970... - 172k -
all you Fascists going to lose! lmfao.

Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.

It will be a short-lived celebration.

Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS.

Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.

Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax. This is also critical. Recall back during the initial Obama-care battles, the Democrats called it a penalty, Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the Supreme Court, they said ‘hey, a penalty or a tax, either way’. So, Roberts gave them a tax. It is now the official law of the land — beyond word-play and silly shenanigans. Obama-care is funded by tax dollars. Democrats now must defend a tax increase to justify the Obama-care law.

Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states —‘comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.’ Roberts ruled that is a no-no. If a state takes the money, fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state refuses money, the federal government can’t penalize the state by yanking other funding. Therefore, a state can decline to participate in Obama-care without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10, 12, 25 states not participating in “national” health-care? Suddenly, it’s not national, is it?

Ultimately, Roberts supported states rights by limiting the federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause and he forced liberals to have to come clean and admit that Obama-care is funded by tax increases.

Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did more than his part and should be applauded.

And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown threw his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.

Brilliant.

Source; http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/9398-why-chie...

The strategy of tension (Italian: strategia della tensione) is a theory that describes how to divide, manipulate, and control public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateurs, and false flag terrorist actions.[1]

The theory began with allegations that the United States government and the Greek military junta of 1967–1974 supported far-right terrorist groups in Italy and Turkey, where communism was growing in popularity, to spread panic among the population who would in turn demand stronger and more dictatorial governments
Strategy of tension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The strategy of tension (Italian: strategia della tensione) is a theory that describes
how to divide, manipulate, and control public opinion using fear, propaganda,...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tens ...- 94k -

We won wrote:

You stupid republicans need to learn that Obama is in charge and there is nothing you can do about it. When we tell you something you need to just shut up and listen because we know what is best. Accept the fact that we can do whatever we want and there is nothing you can do about it. Suck it

...no you loose!! an all americans loose!! freedom to choose, higher taxes, unstopable taxiaton, nanny gov. socialism etc, etc. so how do you win?