Democrats, losing ground in Wisconsin, play down recall election

May 27, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Chicago Tribune

Supporters cheer for Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker as the Republican campaigns along with Louisiana Gov.

Comments
61 - 80 of 316 Comments Last updated Jun 20, 2012
Democrat Tool Fools

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DangerousRiteWingCrusader wrote:
<quoted text>
Lies can win you a few elections but will GOP crooks ever get their reputation back?
. GOP crooks do not hesitate to Sabotage America just to hurt another Negro
. In the end we will all lose because non-Caucasian countries are watching us with suspicion
. If we can sabotage our own Negro president, we make it clear, as supremacists, we are willing and able to sabotage any non-Caucasian government around the World
. Hopefully most Americans will reject our GOP's vindictive, evil and destructive supremacist ways
But I thought Obama was known as the "Magic" Negro, annointed by God himself, to "rule" the U.S.? So how can it be that the GOP can sabotage the Magic Negro President?
Obama Eats Dogs

Cherry Hill, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Walker is walking all over the communist tainted teacher's unions and Obamaphiles..

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I picture a dog with it's tail between its legs, whimpering and whimpering..........ieee iee iee iee. Liberals can't man up in their tu tu's, they are an aberation to nature and the USA.
CarolO

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Barrett had one month and has been outspent 25 to 1. If he had more time, I think the results would be different. How many politicans do you know that had only one month to campaign?
Apparently over half the people in Wisconsin don't care about Walkers lies and shoddy deals. He said the unions had to go because of Wisconsins debt only later to testify that breaking the unions had nothing to do with the debt. His forcing a primary with false Democrats running against true Democrats another one of his tricks he's played. He has ruined the state of Wisconsin pitting neighbors, friends and relatives against one another and the only governor to need a defense fund.
Amazing how Wisconsin had a union state for 70 years without a problem until Walker come on the scene.

His "job" report on the Truth-o-Meter netted him another outright lie!
Cat74

Mchenry, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Democrats distort their situation, because they drink toomuch, and use drugs. They would have known from the begining that this was a losing proposition if the were sober.
Progressive Ha Ha Ha

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cat74 wrote:
Democrats distort their situation, because they drink toomuch, and use drugs. They would have known from the begining that this was a losing proposition if the were sober.
Yes...they can drink too much and do drugs as they are only in union jobs and don't have a boss to fire them for their pathetic job performance. Like failed teachers who report to a "rubber room" to play video games all day in NYC instead of being fired. Unions are poison to society.
Democrat Tool Fools

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

CarolO wrote:
Barrett had one month and has been outspent 25 to 1. If he had more time, I think the results would be different. How many politicans do you know that had only one month to campaign?
Apparently over half the people in Wisconsin don't care about Walkers lies and shoddy deals. He said the unions had to go because of Wisconsins debt only later to testify that breaking the unions had nothing to do with the debt. His forcing a primary with false Democrats running against true Democrats another one of his tricks he's played. He has ruined the state of Wisconsin pitting neighbors, friends and relatives against one another and the only governor to need a defense fund.
Amazing how Wisconsin had a union state for 70 years without a problem until Walker come on the scene.
His "job" report on the Truth-o-Meter netted him another outright lie!
Look, if Barrett ends up winning, all you democrat tool fools will brag about it into the next century.

Right now, you're doing the typical democrat blah blah blah, Walker this, yada yada, Walker that, whine snivel drool, and Walker the other, bray bray bray like the donkey tool fools you are which is making B.S. excuses as to why your guy Barrett may end up losing.

A month ago, all of you tool fools were bragging about how Walker was going to get his ass kicked out of the Gov's Mansion. Well, if he doesn't, stop with B.S. excuses and get over it.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

CarolO wrote:
Barrett had one month and has been outspent 25 to 1. If he had more time, I think the results would be different. How many politicans do you know that had only one month to campaign?
Apparently over half the people in Wisconsin don't care about Walkers lies and shoddy deals. He said the unions had to go because of Wisconsins debt only later to testify that breaking the unions had nothing to do with the debt. His forcing a primary with false Democrats running against true Democrats another one of his tricks he's played. He has ruined the state of Wisconsin pitting neighbors, friends and relatives against one another and the only governor to need a defense fund.
Amazing how Wisconsin had a union state for 70 years without a problem until Walker come on the scene.
His "job" report on the Truth-o-Meter netted him another outright lie!
The unions and Mafia are hurting. The Mafia had to lay off one police chief and three judges they other day.
Cat74

Mchenry, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

If these unfortunates couldn't afford the recall why did they go for it? No, the money dried up as soon as their financial people realized they couldn't win this one. Democrats are like alcoholics, they want what they want when they want it no matter what they have to do to get it, and sometimes they are going to lose big time.

Since: Sep 08

Placitas, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

bcman1975 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have the nerve to quote Politifact? LOL. A well known liberally biased organization all you have to do https://www.google.com/webhp... a google search on their bias to find overwhelming evidence.
Of course you can't debunked anything Politifact used to justify their PANTS ON FIRE rating of claim the BALD FACED LIAR posted.

But when BALD FACED LIARS are exposed they claim the FACTS that show they are BALD FACED LIARS where published by some kind of liberal media. That shows an intellectual capability and critical thinking ability of a 6th grader.

BTW: Your google 'evidence' is BULLSH!T as well. But I did like that 3rd link on the pages:

"Rachel Maddow has had a bit of a problem lately swallowing what Politifact is dishing out. So have a lot of other liberals. The idea behind Politifact was that it would be an unbiased source of fact checking for politicians and pundits alike. It was a laudable idea and a welcome change from the usual “he said/she said” reporting of the mainstream media. And for a while, it was good.

"Unfortunately for Politifact, as Stephen Colbert said,“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.” What this means is that even as Politifact strove to be a neutral player, the avalanche of lies coming from the Right, by necessity, gave rise to far more negative ratings for conservatives than liberals. The Right Wing, ever watchful for someone paying attention to their deceptions a little too closely, objected to this at the top of their lungs.

But still, for a while, it was good.....I think Maddow is right. Politifact isn’t even trying anymore. What a damn shame." http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/02/21/rache...

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

PlacitasRoy wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course you can't debunked anything Politifact used to justify their PANTS ON FIRE rating of claim the BALD FACED LIAR posted.
But when BALD FACED LIARS are exposed they claim the FACTS that show they are BALD FACED LIARS where published by some kind of liberal media. That shows an intellectual capability and critical thinking ability of a 6th grader.
BTW: Your google 'evidence' is BULLSH!T as well. But I did like that 3rd link on the pages:
"Rachel Maddow has had a bit of a problem lately swallowing what Politifact is dishing out. So have a lot of other liberals. The idea behind Politifact was that it would be an unbiased source of fact checking for politicians and pundits alike. It was a laudable idea and a welcome change from the usual “he said/she said” reporting of the mainstream media. And for a while, it was good.
"Unfortunately for Politifact, as Stephen Colbert said,“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.” What this means is that even as Politifact strove to be a neutral player, the avalanche of lies coming from the Right, by necessity, gave rise to far more negative ratings for conservatives than liberals. The Right Wing, ever watchful for someone paying attention to their deceptions a little too closely, objected to this at the top of their lungs.
But still, for a while, it was good.....I think Maddow is right. Politifact isn’t even trying anymore. What a damn shame." http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/02/21/rache...
Call Soros, have him hook you up to the electrodes again. Your out of juice boy.
Cat74

Mchenry, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ms. Wasserman, Chairwoman of the DNC, was on T V earlier, and she is going to Wisconsin Saturday to campaign for Barrett. She talked about boots on the ground, but she didn't even pretend Barrett had a chance to win. What a mess. This will not only make the Unions look silly, it makes the Democrats look stupid too. They didn't have to do this recall thing. They should have known if Barrett couldn;t win in the General election he wouldn't win in the recall either.
River Veteran

Atlanta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DangerousRiteWingCrusader wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't pop the champagne yet, T-bag'r; your servants may end up enjoying it instead, as the people of Wisconsin may actually boot the crook out of their mansion.
. GOP crooks are professional liars but we'll continue to shine the light on GOP lies...
Yet, your hypocritical azz is SILENT about your messiah Obama and his LIES! WHY.....never mind, you're the typical, liberal, hypocrite. Do you want a list of Obama's lies?????? It might take 3 or 4 postings on this thread since they only allow 4000 characters and you know...obama has a bunch of lies.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cat74 wrote:
Ms. Wasserman, Chairwoman of the DNC, was on T V earlier, and she is going to Wisconsin Saturday to campaign for Barrett. She talked about boots on the ground, but she didn't even pretend Barrett had a chance to win. What a mess. This will not only make the Unions look silly, it makes the Democrats look stupid too. They didn't have to do this recall thing. They should have known if Barrett couldn;t win in the General election he wouldn't win in the recall either.
They are gluttons for punishment. They are saying that they are going after the govenor of Louisanna also.
DangerousRiteWin gCrusader

Decatur, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

bcman1975 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you show us evidence of republican racist dumbass? remember which party created the KKK and was against the civil rights act???? The democratic party you fool!!!!
You must be dumb and stupid if you need proof. You are swimming in raw sewer while asking for proof that the stinky water is actual sewer...

. It's racist to call the Negro president a foreigner
. It's racist to boycott/sabotage the 1st Negro president
. It's racist to refer to Negro president as food-stamp president
. It's racist to say regarding a Negro president: "I want him to fail"
. Tea-party is about race. Debt and deficit grew by leaps and bounds under Cheney/Bush for 12 years and no T-Bag'r took it to the street(Racist Whites fear the Negro president would favor reparation to our American Negroes for slavery)
Gold Tooth

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DangerousRiteWingCrusader wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be dumb and stupid if you need proof. You are swimming in raw sewer while asking for proof that the stinky water is actual sewer...
. It's racist to call the Negro president a foreigner
. It's racist to boycott/sabotage the 1st Negro president
. It's racist to refer to Negro president as food-stamp president
. It's racist to say regarding a Negro president: "I want him to fail"
. Tea-party is about race. Debt and deficit grew by leaps and bounds under Cheney/Bush for 12 years and no T-Bag'r took it to the street(Racist Whites fear the Negro president would favor reparation to our American Negroes for slavery)
Hey, fuckturd, so you're saying Bush was Pres. for 12 yrs. and Cheney V.P. for 12 yrs.?

You far left donkey dicks for brains are hilarious....

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
May 29, 2012
 
DangerousRiteWingCrusader wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be dumb and stupid if you need proof. You are swimming in raw sewer while asking for proof that the stinky water is actual sewer...
. It's racist to call the Negro president a foreigner
. It's racist to boycott/sabotage the 1st Negro president
. It's racist to refer to Negro president as food-stamp president
. It's racist to say regarding a Negro president: "I want him to fail"
. Tea-party is about race. Debt and deficit grew by leaps and bounds under Cheney/Bush for 12 years and no T-Bag'r took it to the street(Racist Whites fear the Negro president would favor reparation to our American Negroes for slavery)
So I guess that you would call me a racist because I think that you are a negro troll that loves your God obama and will lie your butt off to protect him and your socialist party called democrats.Or am I a racist because I think that you are a lowlife welfare spam artist? Answer one question,what race is a person being racist about when they disagree with Obama seeing that he is half white and half black? Get back to me when you can figure out how to answer the questions.
Cat74

Mchenry, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Democrats won't go after anyone right now. They need every penny they can squeeze out of their donors for the Presidential election. Obama is not getting the money he got last time. Donors are funny. They won't give big if it looks like a loosing proposition. They might give a few bucks, but he needs big money.
DangerousRiteWin gCrusader

Decatur, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
May 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gold Tooth wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, fuckturd, so you're saying Bush was Pres. for 12 yrs. and Cheney V.P. for 12 yrs.?
You far left donkey dicks for brains are hilarious....
You are the sh!t brains...

Yes, 12-years around Bill Clinton.

. Bush Senior had a four-year term with Cheney as Secretary Of State, plus another eight-year Bush/Cheney term which ended in 2009 after Obama's Inoguration.

. Under Bush Senior, in making decisions on the Fiscal Year 1990 budget, Cheney recognized the necessity of cutting the budget and downsizing the military establishment, but he favored a cautious approach. In 2002, Bush/Cheney say : "Reagan proved deficits don't matter"

You don't know history...
DangerousRiteWin gCrusader

Decatur, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
May 29, 2012
 
Gold Tooth wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, fuckturd, so you're saying Bush was Pres. for 12 yrs. and Cheney V.P. for 12 yrs.?
You far left donkey dicks for brains are hilarious....
You are the sh!t brains...

Yes, 12-years around Bill Clinton.

. Bush Senior had a four-year term with Cheney as Secretary Of State, plus another eight-year Bush/Cheney term which ended in 2009 after Obama's Inauguration.

. Under Bush Senior, in making decisions on the Fiscal Year 1990 budget, Cheney recognized the necessity of cutting the budget and downsizing the military establishment, but he favored a cautious approach. In 2002, Bush/Cheney say : "Reagan proved deficits don't matter"

You don't know history...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••