|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
Yes! Europe has minimal natural resources and only Germany is worth being friends with. Big emerging markets in India, Brazil and China are more worth our time than failing european states. We have the second largest navy in the world and we are friends with the largest. We should put more effort into buying things from Abroad and bringing it hear.
|
|
Since: Feb 12
Sittard, Netherlands
|
Please wait...
|
|
The EU Hater
London, UK
|
Giggs wrote: Yes! Europe has minimal natural resources and only Germany is worth being friends with. Big emerging markets in India, Brazil and China are more worth our time than failing european states. We have the second largest navy in the world and we are friends with the largest. We should put more effort into buying things from Abroad and bringing it hear. All Brits get it and want withdrawal - except Cameron. The Eastern Europeans have spoilt it for everyone.
|
|
Since: Jan 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
|
|
Dresden
London, UK
|
If it wern't for the commonwealth we'd be buggered and if we didn't have to support the retards in the rest of the EU(the southern and eastern countries) we'd be so much wealthier. Spain and Greece make me want to vomit on them the inept lazy sh1ts.
|
|
Transhuman Cyborg
New York, NY
|
Britian was never really european anyway. They are islanders stuck in the middle of an ocean, like Hawaiians and Samoans
|
|
charliE14
London, UK
|
|
|
charliE14
London, UK
|
Judged:
1
Yes it's costing us money every day and I believe the EU is unfair with the UK policy's I think they have it in for us.
|
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
Judged:
1
hahaha wrote: <quoted text> The Second Largest Navy in the World Belongs to China. Followed by Russia. Its even on the news of CNN, dear imbeciles. http://articles.cnn.com/1999-05-28/world/9905... Mabey it would be a good idea to READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE instead of the first paragraph. "Its navys 61 submarines and 54 surface ships are capable of little more than coastal patrols" "progress has been slow. They arent buying in a number that will lead to any kind of immediate increase in combat capability, Montaperto said. Reports are they are having trouble maintaining the submarines and the aircraft, McNaugher said. The pilot training isnt all that effective. Its going to take a long time to absorb these weapons. The assessment at the Pentagon is that China could not project a sustained military force any distance from its borders. American military officials also believe that China, for all its size, could not even successfully invade tiny Taiwan." "China is focused more on holding its ground closer to home." "China remains a superpower wannabe."
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: And what about this article then? China overtakes Japan as world's second-biggest economy? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12427321 Its on your native BBC.com Where's Britain in this article? haha Thats why I said... "China are more worth our time than failing european states." You sound like a fool.
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: GFP provides a unique analytical display of data covering global military powers with statistics: http://www.globalfirepower.com/ As of 2012: 1st - United States, 2nd - Russia, 3rd - China, 4th - India, 5th - United Kingdom (Right at the bottom) Whats up with that? As far as Im concerned.... Russia India and China dont have blue-water navys. We do and so does America.
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: http://www.tipstopten.com/2011 /05/top-10-strongest-armies-in -world-2011.html 1st United States, 2nd China The People's Liberation Army of China is the largest in the world numbering over two million soldiers even after significant cuts in forces in recent years. The Chinese Army was established in 1927 and involved in the Sino-Japanese conflict, World War II, Korean War and Vietnam. 2 million solders, thats twice as large as Russia. LOL! United Kingdom is nowhere near the American Russian or the Chinese forces, since they're the largest forces of the World. Technology is what matters son. Whats the point of having loads of 1950s tanks if we have rockets that can hit all of them from 100s or 1000s of miles away. A large pesent army wont be much good either if they dont even want to fight for their own government.
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: <quoted text> No, since you have claimed that Britain has the Second Largest Army of the World, and failed epically. So, you are an id1ot. "We have the second largest navy in the world and we are friends with the largest." did you replace the word Navy with Army? Navy = Boats Army = Soldiers Admitedly I should have phrased it better. Instead of "Largest" I should have said most powerfull. my bad......but it nothing in comparison to the sht your talking.
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: <quoted text> Russia has the most advanced space technologies of the World, Laser weapons circulating around the globe, one shot and half of Britain is gone. Russia has the biggest nukes of the World, hydrogen bombs, chemical weapons, Russian satellites cover 90% of the World, meaning they see everything you do in Britain any second. Russian spies are infiltrated all over the Europe, including England chasing and reporting every move to Kremlin. So they know everything what you got in here. And in addition to that, Russian fighter jets, are the Second advanced jet fighters of the World after American, taking into consideration that Sukohyan SU is Russian, Mikhoyan Migs are Russian, YAK's are Russian, and even NASA currently pays Russia to use their Kutsk rockets to carry their looser astronauts to space, because they're space shuttle programs have failed them. So Russia or China alone, could destroy you sideways, and that would last a second. Thank them for being peaceful nations of the World. Your ex masters have always built some decent weaponry. But dont act like they have the finances to maintain and use it all atm. They have still got a long way to go. Not to mention they would be whiped off the map by NATO. PS. dont tell me about fighter jets and rockets. I could go on for hours telling you about design details etc..... Russias fighterjets are decades behind the UKs and their prototypes are good but they cant afford to bring them into service. I could tell you alot about how flawed mig 29s and SU 27s are. They were briliant planes but russia couldnt afford to improve them. They are "4th generation fighters". Technology has moved on. You have the mentality of a kid with top trump cards. Fighterjets and militarys are alot more complicated than that. Its clear you havent got a clue and arguing with you is a waste of everyones time.
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: <quoted text> Who cares about the ships, thats a only one advantage from the millions what defines the military strength in terms of power. My bad then, thats ok. When i mentioned Englands Navy I was talking about our ability to use shipping lanes all over the world. Navy for us is not just military....we have a merchant Navy also. You turned my opinion about leaving the EU in favour of trade with other places into a massive debate about military technology.
|
|
Giggs
Barnsley, UK
|
hahaha wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/848 6812.stm Its even on the BBC, Russia has unveiled its new stealth fighter jet, which is a rival to the ageing US F-22 Raptors. The new jet has been developed in partnership with India. It is seen as a significant milestone in Russia's efforts to modernise its Soviet-era military hardware. This bird can fak your British ships sideways, and you wouldn't even see him coming on your radars. Plus Russian "TESLA" tanks, are one of the Best in the World, its been proved during the Second World War, which Russia has won for you losers. so when are they entering service? ....im waiting
|
|
Since: Mar 09
Gig Harbor, WA
|
Please wait...
hahaha wrote: <quoted text> China is communist, and is allied with Russia, since they're both Communist. They don't give a fak about United Kingdom, trust me. Just like North Korea doesn't, hahaha... Oh but, Russia and China do give a f-k about UK. The UK will be ending foreign aid to both countries this year. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12589626 US will be ending foreign aid to Russia as well. The countries that receive the most in foreign aid hate the UK and USA anyway. Next on the agenda.. close the borders. Make it more difficult and less appealing for foreigners to enter the UK and USA. We can't afford to take on other countries problems any longer.
|
|
allah has a beard
London, UK
|
I like the way East European women have sex like they are dancing.
|
|
strudelpaddy
London, UK
|
Norseceltic wrote: <quoted text> We can't afford to take on other countries problems any longer. Funny thing is, that's what China has said to America.
|
|
Since: Mar 09
Gig Harbor, WA
|
Please wait...
strudelpaddy wrote: <quoted text> Funny thing is, that's what China has said to America. No, they still receive hand outs.. http://news.investors.com/Article/560621/2011... Ludicrous! Time for America to tally up the billions in aid given over all these years and have China put it towards the principal debt owed.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|