Ukraine: The invasive generosity of Budapest and Bucharest

This is the result of Magayr arrogant policies.

The above post was written by Pissy , the result of a dumb Slowak

poor little slovak, your 5 million population and early 20th century mentality can handle democratic principles such as dual-citizenship, autonomy or self determination...your benes decrees and language language laws won't save you....Felvidek (south slovakia) will eventually be ours again, as will parts of Transylvania.....remember "tot nem ember"

Transylvania was a separate entity with own rulers until fagyars got hold of it in the bi-monarchy of Austro-Hungary. Crazy asians even banned romanian and german from public spaces and began to fagyarize the population of Transylvania just the way it happened in Hungary with the germans and jews.
At the end of World War 1 both Romanians and Saxons voted to join Romania so fu buddy and your great fagyaroszag dream.

@Ala cumva ai inebunit?? ce-ai frate la cap de-l bagi in seama pe Pacala ala ce nu-si stie macar limba??!

Mariusz wrote:

@Ala cumva ai inebunit?? ce-ai frate la cap de-l bagi in seama pe Pacala ala ce nu-si stie macar limba??!

Plictisit?:P

Ala wrote:

<quoted text>
Plictisit?:P

ahhaaa ,pai atunci te-nteleg :)

Are you speaking Pesky's Gypsy language?

Nimic nou, Rusia inca nu-i are la inima pe ucrainieni si incearca acum sa-i invrajbeasca si pe romani impotriva lor cu stiri idioate... probabil au invatat si ei sa faca propaganda massmedia de la prietenii lor din vest :)

http://www.google-gadgets.co.cc/

you poor roumanian or should I write roma-nian....so your child-like mentality can understand. I must suck not knowing anything about your artificial (gypo) country. So now the Germans were banned from cities and public places too...aha...what moronic things do they teach you there in roma-nia. Tell me you idiot brown balkan monkey...what did those mythical vlach rulers call Transylvania? I hope facts and unbiased sources don't upset you little chimps.

No written or architectural evidence bears witness to the presence of "proto-Romanians" the lands north of the Danube during the millennium after Rome's withdrawal from Dacia. This fact has fueled a centuries-long feud between Romanian and Hungarian historians over Transylvania.
Library of Congress, Research Division

aha tigani prost

Typical hungolian,instead of providing evidence of otherwise it barks about whole other stuff by copy-pasting bs. Go back to your tent mong.:3

From the same source you 'forgot' to copy-paste:

"In 896 the Magyars, the last of the migrating tribes to establish a state in Europe[...]The Hungarians constructed fortresses, founded a Roman Catholic bishopric, and began proselytizing Transylvania's indigenous people. There is little doubt that these included some Romanians who remained faithful to the Eastern Orthodox Church after the East-West Schism.[...] Stephen and his successors recruited foreigners to join the Magyars in settling the region. The foreign settlers included people from as far off as Flanders; Szeklers, a Magyar ethnic group; and even Teutonic Knights[...] Nobility was restricted to Roman Catholics and, while some Romanian noblemen converted to the Roman rite to preserve their privileges, most of the Orthodox Romanians became serfs.[...] Transylvania became virtually autonomous. As early as 1288 Transylvania's noblemen convoked their own assembly, or Diet. Under increasing economic pressure from unrestrained feudal lords and religious pressure from zealous Catholics, many Romanians emigrated from Transylvania eastward and southward over the Carpathians."

Romania

Ronald D. Bachman, ed. Romania: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1989.

aha,unguri-> http://www.krepublishers.com/02-Journals/IJHG... "there is a relatively small difference between the Hungarian and Indian groups, the Central-
Europeans differ more"

Is there anyone besides to two posters who give a big rat's posterior about this tripe?

dumb chimp...there were no people called "romanians' in 896.

Romanian historians have tried to argue that the Romanian-speakers have always lived in the territory of Romania (originating, it is claimed, from Romanized Dacian tribes and/or Roman legionaries), there is compelling evidence to show that the Romanian-speakers were originally part of the same population as the Vlachs, whose language and way of life were developed somewhere to the south of the Danube. Only in the twelfth century did the early Romanian-speakers move northwards.
Origins: Serbs, Albanians and Vlachs
(Macmilan, London, 1998, p. 22-40)

the indigenous people of Transylvania were slavs...sorry little monkey, no mention of vlachs...only in state sponsored dogma. I almost pitty a brainwashed fool such as yourself and your countrymen

Szatmari wrote:

bla-bla-fagyar

Lol,fagyar related to indians is being gypsy. Slavs come from Poland and "Ukraine",they didn't even exist in ancient times as ethnicity but at least they are European people. Anyway,continuing education of barbarians:

"The Romanized population of Pannonia (for which the historian Theodore Mommsen calculated a population of about 200,000 around the 4th century) survived Barbarian invasions (by the Huns, Goths, Avars and others).

There were other places in Pannonia where local population continued to speak forms of Vulgar Latin after the 5th century: Pécs, Sopron, Szombathely, Dunaújváros. Many Christian relics with inscriptions in Latin have been found in these towns."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hungary_Pec...

*Remains of a Christian church of the 5th century in Sopianae (Pécs), Pannonia (Hungary)

Gypsy...northern India (indo-aryan)in other words indo-european...ahaha Magyar is turanian. You balkan monkeys are hilarious you know absolutely sh it...not even your own origins what is a roumanian, but mongrels...is this a Dacian or even European?
Nicolae Titulescu la Societatea Natiunilor
http://youtu.be/tI7CtuOfgk4
Elena Basescu se balbaie
http://youtu.be/52-Rit_gZBU

roumanian=tatar,turk,gypsy and only god knows what else.
Like all of Europe posts signs.....NU FURATI roma-nians

Szatmari wrote:

bla-bla-fagyar

As funny as it is to show me your blood relatives I really don't care.

Back to Mongolia and India(according to genetics you're closer to indians and gypsies,lol).

http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,952214,00.jp... Average hungarians from Gypsy-Magyar Garda

http://www.ecc2007.de/uploads/pics/HUN-Men.jp... National pride in Hungary.


http://www.youtube.com/watch... etc.

Szatmari wrote:

I must suck

Yes, you should suck.)
Poor bastard, your country doesn't have a real history not to mention culture, either. Just like your North neighbors, 2 countries made of Europe's renegades, thieves, criminals and, most of all, morons - "Fat happy Americans", as the Greeks like to call you :):):)

Pro Ukraine wrote:

Are you speaking Pesky's Gypsy language?

and you talking to... whom ?

mai vereeee ,dati-l in pula noastra pe idiot. asta cauta numai un pic de atentie : D

"2 countries made of Europe's renegades
Poor bastard, your country doesn't have a real history not to mention culture,"

how true.....slovakia, created in 1993. Its history is one line in a history text, artificially created from Hungary's northern highlands

roumania, fabricated in 1859 and became fully independent from the ottoman empire in 1878. Its short history (especially in the the early 20th century) is one of treachery and deceit...signing secret treaties while betraying its allies in both WWs because it coveted its neighbors territory. Today this country is associated with corruption and the exportation of criminals to western Europe, its people are viewed as gypsies (tigani)....NU FURATI!