Is Glenn Beck too right wing even for Fox News?

Judged:

1

1

1

humberto wrote:

Riberts admits the health care act under the commerce clause is UnConstirutional, but they voted for the act under some tax clause instead.
BUT Roberts kniws and admits the US Supreme Court cannot act on the tax portion ( fines) of the act till it goes into effect in 2014 .
What a bunch bullshit they are .- Thats out right illegal partial theory bullshit !

Judged:

1

1

1

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Roberts is Conservative too.

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd like to know how Roberts defines "tax."
It seems to me, a "tax" is something that is applied to some action, like purchase or working for wages or making a profit or importing, etc., etc., etc.
This is definitely a case where the definition of "tax" has been corrupted to mean an inaction can be "taxed."
According to this ruling, a person can be "taxed" if they don't travel once a day on a certain street, for example.
This is just one more case that proves 5 justices are better than 9 justices. We need to go back to the original definition of the Supreme Court before FDR stacked it to ensure all of his agenda would pass regardless of constitutionality. Today, the Supreme Court can accurately be described as schizophrenic.

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd like to know how Roberts defines "tax."
It seems to me, a "tax" is something that is applied to some action, like purchase or working for wages or making a profit or importing, etc., etc., etc.
This is definitely a case where the definition of "tax" has been corrupted to mean an inaction can be "taxed."
According to this ruling, a person can be "taxed" if they don't travel once a day on a certain street, for example.
This is just one more case that proves 5 justices are better than 9 justices. We need to go back to the original definition of the Supreme Court before FDR stacked it to ensure all of his agenda would pass regardless of constitutionality. Today, the Supreme Court can accurately be described as schizophrenic.

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>I Think what he was saying is that the Mandate has to stand as a tax in order to be held constitutional by Congress's Authority.
4. CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Part III-C, concluding that the individual mandate may be upheld as within Congress’s power under the Taxing Clause. Pp. 33-44.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/scotus-uphol...

humberto wrote:

<quoted text>
Good point. except for the number of judges.
Five schizophrenics or nine schizophrenics
whats the difference - why isn't the mechinism to remove the applied for their corrupt delusional obstinance to profer evidence ?

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>I Think what he was saying is that the Mandate has to stand as a tax in order to be held constitutional by Congress's Authority.
4. CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Part III-C, concluding that the individual mandate may be upheld as within Congress’s power under the Taxing Clause. Pp. 33-44.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/scotus-uphol...

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd like to know how Roberts defines "tax."
It seems to me, a "tax" is something that is applied to some action, like purchase or working for wages or making a profit or importing, etc., etc., etc.
This is definitely a case where the definition of "tax" has been corrupted to mean an inaction can be "taxed."
According to this ruling, a person can be "taxed" if they don't travel once a day on a certain street, for example.
This is just one more case that proves 5 justices are better than 9 justices. We need to go back to the original definition of the Supreme Court before FDR stacked it to ensure all of his agenda would pass regardless of constitutionality. Today, the Supreme Court can accurately be described as schizophrenic.

humberto wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't tax people to buy a service from government .

humberto wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't tax people to buy a service from government .

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Social Security is a service you buy from the government.

OzRitz wrote:

<quoted text>
Unbelievable, what about roads n bridges, national parks, education, police, fire and that boogey word 'health' are you telling us everyone should pay individually for the above.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-29/brissen...

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Social Security is a service you buy from the government.

Judged:

1

1

1

humberto wrote:

<quoted text>
Look at how states suppelmented collage tution and the inept eggheads gouging & raising it to a point the states can't even afford it - Thats management ? To boot, their graduates can't or even know how to find work .- F them.

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
(typo)
"It took me to find you another thread...."
Please learn to write in the English language.))))
Actually, I manage drilling projects around the world. Sometimes that takes all my time. It's a job, a career, and something you have to give a priority to.

Judged:

1

1

1

Liberal4Life wrote:

<quoted text>
Your too Ignorant and I notice that you recite very well what your Corporate Faascist handler's tell you to recite line by line special thanks to FIX New's and Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity for filling your Out Law Biker Brain with Crap!=)!
Now back to the subject so why don't you Far Righties want to admit your love for Corporate Fascism and Vutlure Capitalism could it be that it's oaky when you just work for a check that you ignore the rammifications of Corporate Greed? Greed is Not Good! When it harms other's but again the Far Right has no problem with this so long as they are the one's not being hurt.
Did not Mitt Romney invent the Affordable Health Care Act that he now wishes to Repeal in order to secure his support from the Far Right Radical Extremist Tea Bagging Party?
Was it not Bush and A.G. Gonzalez that invneted Fast and Furious and called it Operation Wide receiver the B.S. that Fake News and the Far Right are trying to blame on Obama and Holder since the Far Right NRA does not want the ATF to be around so that they can secretly run and sell more guns to the Cartel wihtout the Government interefering how convienent!
The Koch Brother's ahve declared their intent in trasforming America in the 1st Bonafide Corporate Fascist Government where all decisions go through the Koch Brother's secretly and they will control Mitt Romney and pull his strings like a good Corporate Fascist Manchurian Style President?
So my Question to you why are you so in love with the ideology of Corporate Fascism? What's the payoff to you?