'SNL' sends up VP debate with Fey, Queen Latifah

NBC will stop at nothing to get people to vote for their candidate, if Obama can't win on his own let's try to make the opponents look foolish. Of course this works with the mentality of the SNL crowd that would vote for Hitler if it meant "change"

It's nice to see pinheads like Tina Fey and Bruce Springsteen encouraging young morons to vote without doing their homework. They can keep their "change"

Good deal wrote:

NBC will stop at nothing to get people to vote for their candidate, if Obama can't win on his own let's try to make the opponents look foolish. Of course this works with the mentality of the SNL crowd that would vote for Hitler if it meant "change"
It's nice to see pinheads like Tina Fey and Bruce Springsteen encouraging young morons to vote without doing their homework. They can keep their "change"

At this point.....the country would elect Homer Simpson....and thats nobodys fault except George Bush and the people who voted for him.

Oh...and speaking of celebrities.....Thanks Dixie Chicks! Thanks Micheal Moore! You are the REAL Americans.You spoke out when it was unpopular to do so....and in the end....you were right.

ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and the New York Times are all 100% in the tank for Obama. Whatever it takes to get him elected, they will do it.

While Gov. Sarah Palin is being grilled on her position on mark-to-market accounting rules, the press can't bother to ask Joe Biden if he could give us a ballpark estimate on when Franklin D. Roosevelt was president -- or maybe take a stab at guessing the decade when televisions were first available to the public.

Being interviewed by Katie Couric on the "CBS Evening News," Biden said: "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said,'Look, here's what happened.'" and palins not qualified? LMAO Joe is more qualified than OBAMA even with this embarrassing stupidity of his....

In The Tank wrote:

ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and the New York Times are all 100% in the tank for Obama. Whatever it takes to get him elected, they will do it.

Ummmm...it seems to be that Sarah Palin and John McCain are doing everything THEY can to make sure Obama is elected!

Another skit? Fey is riding Palin's jock to add fame to her name and up her game. If Fey doesn't run the impression into the ground too much, it will still seem fresh for the 8-16 years when Palin is VP and Prez.

Palin could help Fey's career more than Couric and all the other media parasites. But for now, Fey keeps chewin' on the jock... tired... and diminished returns this skit.

Buff wrote:

<quoted text>At this point.....the country would elect Homer Simpson....and thats nobodys fault except George Bush and the people who voted for him.

Bush favorability rating = 26%
Democrat controlled congress = 9%

At this point Bush has three times the support congress does.
Who are the morons who voted for Pelosi and Reid I ask?

In The Tank wrote:

ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and the New York Times are all 100% in the tank for Obama. Whatever it takes to get him elected, they will do it.

Also, the funniest quip on SNL was last week when Fey/Palin answered "Couric" about rescuing us from the financial mess. CNN played the ACTUAL comments back to back with SNL's rendition of the interview. And guess what? THEY WERE THE SAME COMMENTS! Ooops, I guess there goes the "liberal media" again, looking backwards when they should be looking forward. You betcha!(wink wink).

Buff wrote:

Oh...and speaking of celebrities.....Thanks Dixie Chicks! Thanks Micheal Moore! You are the REAL Americans.You spoke out when it was unpopular to do so....and in the end....you were right.

Nothing wrong with speaking out... if people are stupid enough to listen to all the morons you listed, that is also their problem.

It would be nice to see people speak out and actually state facts, instead of unfounded attacks. But that's what the hardcore dems do...

As far as SNL.. let's face it.. the media, hollywood, etc... are all controlled by hardcore liberals. Anytime an actor states a conservative bias, they get black balled. Since these outlets control what the massed read, see, etc.. it's amazing that we aren't all brainwashed into submission. I guess the fact that the country still has 50% conservative beliefs shows how foolish the message by these liberals really is..

In The Tank wrote:

ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and the New York Times are all 100% in the tank for Obama. Whatever it takes to get him elected, they will do it.

Then why was Sarah Palin quoting the New York Times yesterday????
Quit your whining!!!!
There is nothing more pathetic than a right winger acting like a sore loser.

And what about fox?? Pretty fair?? You actually believe that blustering, ego maniac O'Reily???
How embarrasing to the republican party and about the same is Rush Limbaugh. Have you ever heard either one of them let their guests express an opion that is not the same as theirs???

parlo, the New York Times had an article about Bill Ayers but the article tried to make Obama seem hardly connected to Ayers. It was an effort by the NYT to let people know that Ayers will be heavily talked about in the near future while also suggesting that the issue is minor. This is part of being in the tank for Obama, you sore loser. Palin quoted the NYT because it mentioned Ayers ... she just filled in some of the gaps from the article.

I don't need to stop complaining about how the mainstream media is in the tank for Obama. I know that Obama is trying to force people to stop saying truths about him ... he doesn't seem to believe in the First Amendment.

parlo, I'd say that there is nothing more pathetic than someone who pretends like there is no bias in favor of Obama in the media.

bryts...i think you need a lifeline!~!

At least Biden knows what a bunch of dolts his constituency is -- 15 times last Thursday night: "I'm going to repeat that...", or "I'm going to say that again..."
Thank you Joe for plugging the Department of Redundancy Department.

In The Tank wrote:

parlo, the New York Times had an article about Bill Ayers but the article tried to make Obama seem hardly connected to Ayers. It was an effort by the NYT to let people know that Ayers will be heavily talked about in the near future while also suggesting that the issue is minor. This is part of being in the tank for Obama, you sore loser. Palin quoted the NYT because it mentioned Ayers ... she just filled in some of the gaps from the article.
I don't need to stop complaining about how the mainstream media is in the tank for Obama. I know that Obama is trying to force people to stop saying truths about him ... he doesn't seem to believe in the First Amendment.
parlo, I'd say that there is nothing more pathetic than someone who pretends like there is no bias in favor of Obama in the media.

I read the article, I certainly dont need to hear your crybaby right wing version of it.
Again, if the story was so poor, why was Palin quoting it????
You cant scream "media bias", but then use that same media source for your speeches.
Face it!!! You are incapable of accepting responsibility for anything. Your only response is to blame the media.
Go back to your AM radio! KOOK!!!!

Biden constantly lies. He's also famous in the UK for his plagiarism. Nobody in the UK would take him seriously and it's amazing that anyone in the USA takes him seriously. Maybe he sounds like he knows what he's talking about, but he basically just lies and lies and lies.

parlo, you read the article, so I guess you believe the crybaby communist version of it. I told you why Palin quoted it. Do you have problems reading? Go back to Air America, you socialist freak.

In The Tank wrote:

parlo, you read the article, so I guess you believe the crybaby communist version of it. I told you why Palin quoted it. Do you have problems reading? Go back to Air America, you socialist freak.

Thanks for the kind words!!!
I can always tell when a right winger is backed into a corner, because their only response is insults.

And as for the socialist comment, you might want to look at your own party. Its a bit hypocritical to be calling people socialists when Bush just asked for $700billion to bail out Wall Street.
You are King of the Double Standards.
And a sore loser too!!!!

Glasnos wrote:

<quoted text>
Bush favorability rating = 26%
Democrat controlled congress = 9%
At this point Bush has three times the support congress does.
Who are the morons who voted for Pelosi and Reid I ask?

In the 2006 election, the people voted dems into power mainly to end the war in Iraq. Congress wouldn't pull the funding lest they be accused of "not supporting the troops" - even though the best thing for the troops would be to get them out of there and get them back home with their families.

The folks are mad at Congress for not ending this war. The dems only hold a slight majority in Congress.

I wouldn't brag over W's approval rating - it is one of the lowest in history. But I understand that there isn't much to brag about. We call that "damning him with faint praise."