Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Judged:

1

sassy Jm wrote:

<quoted text>Oh? Explain please.
Chance of baby dying(miscarriage) in both scenerios.
Dr's afraid treatment to save this girls life will cause miscarriage.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, what if she had extensive injuries to her abdomen and her uterus had to be removed even though she was pregnant. Makes you wonder if they would be reluctant.

Judged:

1

1

1

LiT rabbit foo foo wrote:

<quoted text>Wow. Yet another topic Inkstain is ignorant about. Shocker.
Any non-terminal cancer is not necessarily a "killer" (prostate is a good example) yet many will have chemo to knock it back. My dad did that a few years back.
Chemo treatments are used for MANY things, not just cancers. My MIL has chemo treatments for a particularly terrible form of arthritis. Chemo is often used for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases for another example.

Judged:

1

1

1

zef wrote:

<quoted text>
No, personhood is a condition arising from being the arian master race. Do you think we'd be sending jews to the death camps if they were persons? Birth has nothing to do with a woman being a person, or a jew.

Judged:

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, so she should have given up sex becasue she was sick?@@
Spoken like someone that couldn't get laid if her life depended on it.
Who says she knew she was sick BEFORE she got pregnant Skanky?
I dont understand why idiots like you dont think before you say something stupid.

Judged:

1

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Clearly, you're WRONG as usual, since that was the reason given in that country for NOT treating her cancer you dunce.
<quoted text>
Correction: Abortion will always be available as long as ANYONE wants one, with or without doctors and safe medical treatments.
What MOST poeple want to prevent is going back to the age of deaths like this:
http://www.lifeandlibertyforwomen.org/about_g...
Abortion has been around as long as pregnancy has, and its NOT going away. THe only thing that some are TRYING to make go away is making it safer than it used to be.
Fortunately, with assholes like Skanky spouting stupidity against education by saying nonsense like "who needs education? They already KNOW how to use BC.." and even BIGGER idiots with power like we're seeing being played out today by Aikin - who thinks "legitimate rape" doesn't result in pregnancy ONLY proves how wrong fools like Skanky are.
Igorance, most often willful - blindness - like yours Inkstain, most often selective, superstition most often caused by religous dogma, shows just how much the average person DOESNT know, and they pass their ignorance on from generation to generation.
As long as ignorance abounds, then women's right to choose WILL be necessary.

Judged:

1

1

1

sassy Jm wrote:

<quoted text>Oh my...lookie we have here....an honest proabort who flat out said YES to my question of if she supports the choice to abort. That's a first.

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know a lot of women with prostrate cancer?
We were discussing life saving chemo treatments.

Judged:

1

1

1

zef wrote:

<quoted text>Women are female humans. Birth has nothing to do with who is, or isn't a female human. Jews are a race of sub-humans, which is why they can't be called persons. Birth has nothing to do with anyones race. Race is determined by genetics upon conception.

Judged:

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>WTF is this idiot talking about?

Judged:

1

1

Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:

<quoted text>
She said THAT?

Judged:

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
**sighs**
You two are truly the blind leading the stupid.
If she had "extensive injurites to her abdomen and her uterus had to be removed" the fetus would be dead already you idiot.

LiT rabbit foo foo wrote:

<quoted text>
Chemo isn't an "emergency" treatment you dolt.
A car accident and cancer are not even REMOTELY comparitable.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know a lot of women with prostrate cancer?
We were discussing life saving chemo treatments.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
Again talking about chemo treatment in this country would not be viewed as a means to an abortion. I get so tired or repeating past conversations to you so that you can catch and make sense.

Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:

<quoted text>As a treatment for cancer, or as abortifacients?
You never clarified.
Just checking.
I seem to recall that I did - but you ignored that post.

Judged:

1

Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:

<quoted text>The effects of too much Xanax on the planet ZEF.
JMO.

Judged:

1

1

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you sure the embryo died , dr foo? lol

sassy Jm wrote:

<quoted text>Oh my...lookie we have here....an honest proabort who flat out said YES to my question of if she supports the choice to abort. That's a first.
Of course I am okay with the CHOICE to gestate. Didn't I just say it like twice already? I don't think ANYONE should be forced to have sex or get pregnant. WHO here on this forum disagrees with me?
Sweetie,if you have a point,please get to it. My popcorn is getting cold.

Judged:

1

1

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
No but in both cases you would be ending the pregnancy without an abortion. That is the comparison. I have to explain everything to you.