Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.
Comments
238,001 - 238,020 of 305,446 Comments Last updated 2 hrs ago

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252922 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You say You would never get an abortion. Why not.
I notice both you and tomtom are both from PA and now coincidentally you both lack an ip address.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252923 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have any documented evidence that that is actually happening?
Yes, I do...

"Nov 3, 2011 A Pharmacist Refuses to Fill a Prescription for Birth Control: An Ethics ... a Roman Catholic, refused to fill the prescription, explaining that to do ..."

http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusare...

"Some Pharmacies Refuse to Fill Birth Control Prescriptions"

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...

"Pharmacists' Rights at Front Of New Debate
Because of Beliefs, Some Refuse To Fill Birth Control Prescriptions"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles...

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252924 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have any documented evidence that that is actually happening?
Now that I have provided you with that documented proof, I will point out that I posed my remarks as a question and not as a statement, but thanks for the opportunity to show that it does indeed happen

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Why should a Catholic pharmacist be allowed to pick and choose what prescriptions he/she is willing to fill? If the pharmacist is against birth control then the pharmacist doesn't have to use birth control, otherwise he should just do his job and fill scripts."
Ink

Morrisville, PA

#252925 Aug 16, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I notice both you and tomtom are both from PA and now coincidentally you both lack an ip address.
That's totally silly Dick Tracy. Do you know how big a state PA is?
wellwell
#252926 Aug 16, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I do...
"Nov 3, 2011 A Pharmacist Refuses to Fill a Prescription for Birth Control: An Ethics ... a Roman Catholic, refused to fill the prescription, explaining that to do ..."
http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusare...
"Some Pharmacies Refuse to Fill Birth Control Prescriptions"
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...
"Pharmacists' Rights at Front Of New Debate
Because of Beliefs, Some Refuse To Fill Birth Control Prescriptions"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles...
Catholic pharmacists can through the conscience clause.
ThomasA
#252927 Aug 16, 2012
OLD LADY wrote:
<quoted text>
Just what are you for,Thomas? Are you for restrictions,or none? Are you for abortion till birth and after? Lay it on the line Thomas,let me know.
I believe the matter should be left up to the person that's pregnant ,not a bunch of busy bodies trying to interfere in other people's lives. No one has ever established just who is qualified to set restrictions and who in every town and state would be qualified to enforce and carry out those restrictions. Why don't YOU come out with a detailed female body control plan including implementation and enforcement and let's see what's on your mind or let's leave well enough alone with RvW
Ink

Morrisville, PA

#252928 Aug 16, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that I have provided you with that documented proof, I will point out that I posed my remarks as a question and not as a statement, but thanks for the opportunity to show that it does indeed happen
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Why should a Catholic pharmacist be allowed to pick and choose what prescriptions he/she is willing to fill? If the pharmacist is against birth control then the pharmacist doesn't have to use birth control, otherwise he should just do his job and fill scripts."
Thanks for providing the links. My thought is that nobody has the right to make someone do something they don't want to do.

If they are forced by law, then you are taking away their rights.
In the case of pharmacy owners, they have a right to sell what they want. It's their business and is going to be run their way.
Ink

Morrisville, PA

#252929 Aug 16, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I notice both you and tomtom are both from PA and now coincidentally you both lack an ip address.
Is that supposed to be an answer to 'why you wouldn't have a abortion?'
sassyjm

Jackson, NJ

#252930 Aug 16, 2012
tomtom wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone gets it Chaz. You hate being a womn, you hate being pregnant, you hate your lot in life, ytou hate your kid, you hate your husband, you hate religion, etc.
Has you child and husband killed themselves yet? Life with you allows them instant sainthood. I'm surprised thewy haven't asked for snactuary from the nearest church.
This girl is scary. She is so anti- child. Okay so therel are people who don't want large families. Understandable but this one repeats herself over and over with such vengeance about how she loves not being pregnant and not having more than one child. It's like' Whoaaaa easy there ....we got it the first thousand times you said it'.

Another thing with her(and shes not alone) is that she seems fearful as if some man is abusing/mistreating her and forcing her to do things against her will.

Odd thing is that these women are all menopausal age. They aint gettin pregnant.
sassyjm

Jackson, NJ

#252931 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that supposed to be an answer to 'why you wouldn't have a abortion?'
A word of advice,most will not tell you why. They dare not say why for fear they are exposing their true thoughts and beliefs on that act. Soto be safe, they stick with the issue being about others choices. Pick a different scenerio..say Gosnell,sex selection abortion, after viability abortions involving healthy baby, etc...and the suddenly feel justified to voice their 'personal 'opinions.
sassyjm

Jackson, NJ

#252932 Aug 16, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Who says elective abortion isn't justified killing? A form of self-defense.
<quoted text>
Yes, a human embryo/fetus is human. I didn't assume you were discussing puppies or kitties. You were talking about killing, too, just shy of calling it evil. Some killing is evil, but not abortion. You guys have magnified the embryo/fetus's importance beyond that of the woman gestating it.
<quoted text>
I don't condone euthanasia; that's your mistake. I condone individual people deciding their individual medical issues using their rights to privacy and autonomy. It isn't complicated.
You admit to killing a human....a human in your womb is your conceived and developing offspring. Then you say it's justified killing in self-defense?

I feel sorry for you. You need help.

You had no respect for your newest grandaughter moments before her birth YET you exclaimed "a baby girl is on her way" as if you acknowleged her value and importance.

Blah!!!!
sassyjm

Jackson, NJ

#252933 Aug 16, 2012
ThomasA wrote:
<quoted text> I believe the matter should be left up to the person that's pregnant ,not a bunch of busy bodies trying to interfere in other people's lives. No one has ever established just who is qualified to set restrictions and who in every town and state would be qualified to enforce and carry out those restrictions. Why don't YOU come out with a detailed female body control plan including implementation and enforcement and let's see what's on your mind or let's leave well enough alone with RvW
Rumor has it that your Moncie.
Ink

Morrisville, PA

#252934 Aug 16, 2012
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> A word of advice,most will not tell you why. They dare not say why for fear they are exposing their true thoughts and beliefs on that act. Soto be safe, they stick with the issue being about others choices. Pick a different scenerio..say Gosnell,sex selection abortion, after viability abortions involving healthy baby, etc...and the suddenly feel justified to voice their 'personal 'opinions.
I know that is the one question that won't be answered. They can't bring themselves to be truthful.

It amounts to,'I wouldn't kill my own child but I respect another's right to kill their's.'
Foo is wrong

Muscotah, KS

#252935 Aug 16, 2012
godless by choice wrote:
for knutter.....
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2012/08/oregon-c...
yeah no pedphiles in the rcc,you can't make this up
Yet, people do, including the press.
Katie
#252936 Aug 16, 2012
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text> You admit to killing a human....a human in your womb is your conceived and developing offspring. Then you say it's justified killing in self-defense?
When have I ever admitted to killing a human? Was I convicted? Did I serve prison time? Inquiring Minds Want To Know!!!

Really? You don't say? Why, JM, nobody woulda ever known a woman was pregnant with her conceived and developing offspring if you hadn't come riding in on your white horse to announce it to the common folk.

I do declare, terminating an unhealthy or fatal pregnancy would be considered self-defense even if the mighty JM disagrees. Golly gee! Somebody let JM down gently.
I feel sorry for you. You need help.
You had no respect for your newest grandaughter moments before her birth YET you exclaimed "a baby girl is on her way" as if you acknowleged her value and importance.

You don't need to worry your pretty little head about little ol' me, JM. No need to feel sorry for me or pity me or patronize me and claim I need help. My daddy will let me know if I need help and when without your input.

As for my newest granddaughter, you got proof of your claims? Evidence that I "had no respect ... moments before her birth"?

If I personally believe there is a baby at viability without letting my beliefs control the female American population, trying to push them around with my unimportant and unnecessary feelings and beliefs regarding pregnancies, embryos, and fetuses -- just how in hell does that prove I've never acknowledged fetal value, worth, importance, and any other romanticized notion of another woman's uterine contents?
Blah!!!!
Right backatcha you crazyass girl! You are almost a joke even. Almost!

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252937 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for providing the links. My thought is that nobody has the right to make someone do something they don't want to do.
If they are forced by law, then you are taking away their rights.
In the case of pharmacy owners, they have a right to sell what they want. It's their business and is going to be run their way.
A pharmacist is paid to do a job, not to decide for the customers what meds they should be allowed to get based on the pharmacist's personal beliefs.

If the pharmacist is against birth control then the pharmacist doesn't have to use birth control. What about that don't you get? His/her personal beliefs are just that...personal.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252938 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that supposed to be an answer to 'why you wouldn't have a abortion?'
Because I don't want one.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252939 Aug 16, 2012
Foo is wrong wrote:
<quoted text>Yet, people do, including the press.
Good evening Knit/Colorado/Pupsilicious.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#252940 Aug 16, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I know that is the one question that won't be answered. They can't bring themselves to be truthful.
It amounts to,'I wouldn't kill my own child but I respect another's right to kill their's.'
So you want to ask a question and then you want to script my answer for me?

Fundie control-freaks.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#252941 Aug 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe if you didn't stick your nose into a discussion in which you have no idea what was actually said, you wouldn't make yourself look so stupid.
Her new granddaughter wasn't born YET. That was the point. Her granddaughter was still a "fetus" at the tme Katie said her daughter was in labor and "granddaughter" was "on the way".
What you have knowledge of has no bearing on the truth. She said a fetus is "non-existent" and said it's a "non-entity", as well as saying it's technically a fetus until cord is cut.
So you can't explain how an understanding of fetal physiology indicates hypocrisy in the context of one being happy when a new grandchild is born?

That was your accusation, and look! No rhyme or reason! Par for the course.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Television Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Will and Sonny finally have sex on Days of Our ... (Feb '13) 14 min amw 3
Evolution Theory Facing Crisis 21 min MikeF 197
Militias complicate situation on Texas border 28 min Memo From Turner 158
Ashton Kutcher tops Forbes 2014 best-paid TV ac... 31 min firstlisten62 3
Hardcore Pawn Stars Spotted at The Pawn Company 48 min Bgkyred 71
'Y&R' spoiler alert: Are Billy Abbott and Victo... (Jul '13) 53 min amw 52
Walking Dead creator hints Daryl could be gay 1 hr Gremlin 31
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Television People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••