Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Judged:

2

2

2

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Um, the countries with socialized medicine do not force abortion. There may be zero restrictions, but this is not the same as forcing. Please provide just one example of forced abortion where socialized medicine is practiced.

Judged:

3

3

2

Katie wrote:

My alarm goes off in a couple hours. I have to get a nap in.
A baby girl is in process of being born right now. Her mother (my daughter) has been laboring all day since early this morning. Thought she'd be here by now, but not yet.
NR will remind you all how I said personally, at viability, I believe it's a baby. Factually, in utero, it's still a fetus, but my personal opinion is it's a baby. I have posted this a bazillion times, but put it out there again for you, BA.
G'night.

Judged:

1

1

1

zef wrote:

<quoted text>You can believe what you want. You can believe the moon is made of green cheese, you can believe pigs can fly. And I'm sure everyone here will be quick to buy stock in your green cheese empire, while eating your flying pig bacon.
The very idea of granting rights is sheer lunacy. Human rights are inherent. Human rights cannot be granted. Our government does not, nor cannot grant rights. The purpose of our government is to secure the rights that we naturally have. The people that designed our government did so to protect the rights that we already had. That we always have. Human rights are inherent, and inalienable, meaning human rights can neither be given nor taken away.
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/dec...
On December 7, 1941, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. On December 23, the Declaration and the Constitution were removed from the shrine and placed between two sheets of acid-free manilla paper. The documents were then carefully wrapped in a container of all-rag neutral millboard and placed in a specially designed bronze container. It was late at night when the container was finally secured with padlocks on each side. Preparations were resumed on the day after Christmas, when the Attorney General ruled that the Librarian needed no "further authority from the Congress or the President" to take such action as he deemed necessary for the "proper protection and preservation" of the documents in his charge.
inalienable Adj.
1. inalienable - incapable of being repudiated or transferred to another; "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights"
inherent— adj
existing as an inseparable part; intrinsic

Judged:

2

2

2

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
You be sure to show me where I have ever argued for abortion up until the f'n cord is cut. Be quick about it, too, because baby was born and I wanna go meet her.
FTR -- NR makes this erroneous claim about me. YOU are like NR and probably always have been.

Judged:

1

1

1

SassyJM wrote:

<quoted text> So AFTER viability(one day to the next...even hours later...minutes later even)HER pregnancy,HER choice,HER body is "everyones" business?
LOL you a riot with your contradictions.

Judged:

3

3

3

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
F OFF!!....

Judged:

2

1

1

SassyJM wrote:

<quoted text> Katie...dear....no need for cursing here. You're daughter just gave birth to a human being. That "daughter" that she delivered has BECOME a human being now. Go rejoice at this "miracle".
C'mon,that "female fetus" was just a "potential" seconds ago. Now it is TRULY a reality because the cord was cut.
Go....enjoy your "miracle".
(Katie,to her daughter, 1 second prior to birth): it's just a potential."it" is not a human. It is not anything worth being valued. If you want to kill "it" honey,go right ahead. I support your choice.
(katie,to her daughter,1 second after birth): I can't hold back the tears. I'm a grandma. Look at this sweet little baby girl. I'm in AWE.
May I pick her up? C'mere baby girl,grandma LOVES you...well...NOW that your born and have INSTANTLY become human and worthy of my love and attention,I mean.
NEXT..........

Judged:

1

1

1

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
You be sure to show me where I have ever argued for abortion up until the f'n cord is cut. Be quick about it, too, because baby was born and I wanna go meet her.
FTR -- NR makes this erroneous claim about me. YOU are like NR and probably always have been.

Judged:

2

2

2

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Go lie about someone else. You have NO F'N IDEA what you're talking about. Any more crap like this and I'll start blowing up the Topix emails and report your ass for the sh*t it dumps. You are nothing but a polluter.

Judged:

2

2

2

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Threatening the bully?
F OFF Liar for Jesus!
(thanks for the phrase LNM)

Judged:

2

1

1

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
How could I miss this?! lol
A pro-choicer who has said it's a non-existant entity until the cord is cut and the child is breathing has contradicted herself (as expected) in her view of her own grandchild.
"A **baby girl** is in process of being born right now."
"Her mother (my daughter) has been laboring all day since early this morning. Thought she'd be here by now, but not yet."
Laboring all day and the "baby girl" has not arrived yet. But it's a BABY GIRL now, isn't it, Katie? Even though she hasn't been born yet, her cord has not been cut, and she hasn't taken her first breath.
Guess what? CHECKMATE, dimwit.
lol
They think their contradictions aren't obvious. It's a non-entity when it's a stranger's unborn child, but a baby girl or boy when it's their grandchild, or their wanted child. What a bunch of dummies.

Judged:

2

2

1

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
You and your cronies ARE the idiots, fool.
I corrected your erroneous claims about me and you ignored it. I am disgusted by the continued ignorance and stubbornness, outright refusal, on your parts for your continued lacks of ability to distinguish between distinctions. The claim was ALWAYS about the difference between fetus and baby. Your wildass "what-ifs" shot the scenario to bits, but still I gave thoughtful answers.
It was all for nothing.
Follow JM's lead and F OFF Liar for Jesus!

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! You feel "bullied"? Wow, grow thicker skin, Katie. You wouldn't last a day dealing with the lies you and your friends post about us. At least what's being posted about you people is the truth. You can't even handle the truth.

Judged:

1

1

1

Katie wrote:

From Badaxe:
<quoted text>
Neither do I "agree a woman has an absolute right to kill a viable fetus without a justified and compelling reason." Have posted this a gazillion times. I'm sure you'll find these posts with little strain if you wish to confirm.
What I have said time and again is there are exceptions. That sometimes post-viability abortions are a necessity. These are NOT done for superficial reasons, BA, and I'll thank you in advance to provide just ONE documented piece of evidence stating otherwise. Gosnell is not it. He (allegedly) committed criminal acts, PA overlooked it, and let it go on too long. Find something else. Like a woman not wanting to be fat or wanting to hang out with her friends. That is what you've claimed are reasons. Prove it.
<quoted text>
Perfectly? Not even close.

Judged:

2

2

2

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
You wouldn't know truth in any situation. Nothing posted by you guys about is truth. It's your twisted version of it, no more, no less. Don't cry about it, it aint no big deal. Just more proof of your inability to distinguish facts from emotion. I know, I know, it's all a big blur.
But you need a little reminder Lying Lynne Lily. We all congratulated you when your grandson was born. But you chose to use it to make another wildass claim we would somehow support aborting him because he had difficulty breathing. THAT came from your head, what passes for your mind. Not mine. Not any other PCer's.

Judged:

2

2

2

Susanm wrote:

<quoted text>
" and I'll thank you in advance to provide just ONE documented piece of evidence stating otherwise. Gosnell is not it. He (allegedly) committed criminal acts, PA overlooked it, and let it go on too long."
He ALLEEGEDLY committed criminL ACTS???? PA wasn't the only ones who overlooked it, Rhe National Abortion Federation saw it, refussed to allow them into their little fraternity, but did NOTHING to protect woman from that bastard.

Judged:

3

2

2

Katie wrote:

My alarm goes off in a couple hours. I have to get a nap in.
A baby girl is in process of being born right now. Her mother (my daughter) has been laboring all day since early this morning. Thought she'd be here by now, but not yet.
NR will remind you all how I said personally, at viability, I believe it's a baby. Factually, in utero, it's still a fetus, but my personal opinion is it's a baby. I have posted this a bazillion times, but put it out there again for you, BA.
G'night.

Judged:

2

2

1

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
You wouldn't know truth in any situation. Nothing posted by you guys about is truth. It's your twisted version of it, no more, no less. Don't cry about it, it aint no big deal. Just more proof of your inability to distinguish facts from emotion. I know, I know, it's all a big blur.
But you need a little reminder Lying Lynne Lily. We all congratulated you when your grandson was born. But you chose to use it to make another wildass claim we would somehow support aborting him because he had difficulty breathing. THAT came from your head, what passes for your mind. Not mine. Not any other PCer's.

Judged:

2

2

2

Susanm wrote:

<quoted text>
I hope that your daughter isn't having a difficult time pushing out that clump of fetal tissue. I'm sure that you are eagerly awaiting the moment that they "poof" become a child.