Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

cpeter1313 wrote:

I hate it when tunors makes a testicle look like a face.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/390...
Hmmm...it's an ultrasound of a face. Guess they shouldn't have removed it.
<quoted text>

The holy click clacks.

cpeter1313 wrote:

No, I'm one of those atheists who don't celebrate any holy day. I'm also one of those literate people who don't celebrate made-up holidays.
<quoted text>

well hell, wheres the fun in that then?

btw "Lughesaughnah" Is a real holiday dumb dumb, look it up

maybe the spellings wrong, but its real pal, it sone of those whitch holidays where they dance & smoke stuff, i saw a video of it just yesterday

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>That's my Pervesa!

so, whats with the star trekki symbol?

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>
so, whats with the star trekki symbol?

Bingo, I called her on that, as well as a few other pagans. Also little Pieter with his old gay vampire avatar.

I think this is a coven of nerds.

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Bingo, I called her on that, as well as a few other pagans. Also little Pieter with his old gay vampire avatar.
I think this is a coven of nerds.

You still don't know what that logo signifies? You are so lame. Lol. Star trek. Hilarious!

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>
so, whats with the star trekki symbol?

You're funny. I did like the old Star Trek show. It was so bad it was good.

pupsilicious wrote:

<quoted text>Sticking up for porn Ladi? Figures.

You complained about the link and then re-posted it yourself on other threads. That makes you just as guilty as you think I am...so perhaps I should point that out to the "authorities", dontcha think?

cpeter1313 wrote:

Hey, big winged guy, protect us as we slaughter people we don't like.
Keep us safe from the people we slaughter, even though they are doing what they think they must just as we do.
And, if you;ve got a minute, send satan back to hell even though there is no mention of hell in the bible; we just KNOW it's there.
And keep his minions from corrupting people before WE get to corrupt them first.
'K, sky-dude?
<quoted text>

The funny thing is that she posted that prayer because someone on another thread told her to.

It might as well just read..."baa baa baa baa".

I'm also going to be prayed for in the hopes that I repent for being a free-thinker and a non-follower. I've become quite infamous among the Faux sect. Pupsiloser has become my publicity person. Apparently the Faux sect is just fascinated with "porn". Go figure...lmao!!

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>Of course, it is, but there's no way I'm using that batch for my facial. Blecchh.

I don't blame you. Nobody knows exactly what they use to bless it.

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>
",you are viewing everything from your particular perspective" - thats like saying its "MY perspective" that 14 years is OLDER than 12 - youre profoundly stupid
you gonna next say there's no difference bt 14 & 16? 16 & 18?

Oh, now there's a difference? Aren't you the one who said it was fine for men to look at and lust over girls of any age because there really was no way of knowing how old they are...but now there is a difference?? So you'll look at and lust over a 14 year old just as well as an 18 year old because according to you, you often can't tell the difference, but NOW there are concrete differences between each age? Whichever way the wind blows, right? Just keep switching your perspective depending on the debate.

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>
so, whats with the star trekki symbol?

It's an atheism symbol. Now who's the "dum dum"? Why didn't you "look it up"?

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines...

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
**Pat pat**
Of course you will Lynniekins, you useful idiot.
LOL!!!!!
You've been a HOOT today! Poor thing....

Your spelling is off. I've been HOT today, as I am on all days in dealing with you boneheads.

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
LOLOLOL!!
Riiiiiiiight. And your grammar is top notch too, as you've "proved".
**snicker**
All you've "proved" is that you're a dropout Lynne, but we already knew that. You've proven it as well! LOL!

"Speaking of "useful idiot" as you said in a prior post...

"LOLOLOL!!
Riiiiiiiight. And your grammar is top notch too, as you've "proved".
**snicker**"

As a matter of fact, it's a great deal better than yours.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pro...

"As a past participle proven is now about as frequent as proved in all contexts."

Example given: "A person who is charged with a crime is considered innocent until proved guilty."

I've proved you people lied and did it using your own posts that prove you guilty of it.

"Her second album was a hit that proved her critics wrong."

I've proved you people wrong and proved you lied so many times I've lost count.

"All you've "proved" is that you're a dropout..., but we already knew that. You've proven it as well! LOL!"

Well, if you believe I'm a "dropout", I've proved you're even more ignorant than a high school drop out. lol What a bonehead. Keep right on proving you're an irrational and ignorant fool.

As a past participle proven is now about as frequent as proved in all contexts.

It was "proven" that was incorrectly used, and "proved" was the correct word to use. Now both are correct.

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Her psychosis is getting worse, but its amusing to watch! LOL

^^^All this fool can post all day/night long about others is projection.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.c...

"2. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to others.
3. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt."

cpeter1313 wrote:

It also clearly says "extraction" as one of the LIST of procedures included in the term's parameter.
The definition makes it clear that delivery is an all-purpose term. You;re just too stupid and obsessed to see it.
<quoted text>

Petey? We were talking about a woman with eclampsia, remember? Please try to stay focused, or keep displaying your mind-boggling ignorance of something you should know about since you claimed you were in "medical field for 14 years" and implying you would know more than I do about this, fraud.

The "stupid" and "obsessed" one is obviously you. The definition of "delivery" that you provided was about CHILDBIRTH, and the word "extraction" was used...about CHILDBIRTH only. That was very clear to anyone with an ability to read for comprehension, which obviously you don't have.

"Extraction" simply means the act of extracting, and extracting means to "pull out", like to pull out a child from the birth canal, or out of the abdomen to deliver a live child. When a pregnant woman has eclampsia the purpose of the "extraction" is to pull out a live child, you pinhead.

In the case of eclampsia, an LTA isn't performed (as you claimed) to kill the fetus and "deliver" a dead fetus. It's "delivered" vaginally or a c-section is performed to "deliver" a live child.

The definitions you provided for the word "delivery" stated very clearly that it was about childbirth and not abortion. Or are you going to try to claim "childbirth" and "abortion" now mean the same thing? lol

In the post to which you replied with your senselessness, and your post I'm currently addressing I had said,
~Definition 1 clearly states, "the act of giving birth".
Definition 2 clearly states "the procedure of assisting birth of the fetus", both definitions are about childbirth and nowhere does either say anything about it extracting a dead fetus, you pinhead.~

Here are your words again, to my post,
"It also clearly says "extraction" as one of the LIST of procedures included in the term's parameter.
The definition makes it clear that delivery is an all-purpose term. You;re just too stupid and obsessed to see it."

No, that definition of "delivery" was specifically about childbirth, and only childbirth.

As I had said, nowhere in the definition you provided did it say anything about the purpose of "delivery" being to "extract" a [dead fetus], as with an LTA, you know-nothing fraud.

http://www.topix.net/forum/news/abortion/T833...
219561
This is just to illustrate what an obsessed senseless person does, and I did say she posts projections as well as saying to her ~You really have no purpose here except to display what amuses small-minded fools~, she replied yesterday with, "You say that like it's a bad thing. Why can't you stop posting to me? Oh, it's that projection thingy you love so much. Gotcha...carry on, love."
The below are all posts made in reply to mine that weren't made to her.

http://www.topix.net/forum/news/abortion/T833...
219628
I know! I love it when you get all dominatrix on me, my black leather lily!

http://www.topix.net/forum/news/abortion/T833...
219630
Oh, now, Ms. Pervesa, wakey wakey! Abortion is safe and legal and affordable in every state in this wonderful country of ours. Who cares if a couple of sore losers think we are a joke on an internet forum? Enjoy yourself. You're adorable, btw.

http://www.topix.net/forum/news/abortion/T833...
219636
Oooo, there's that hot sanctimonious persona I adore so much! I just love when you get all self-righteous. Blow, baby, blow! Rrowrrr!

http://www.topix.net/forum/news/abortion/T833...
219637
lol.

~~~~~~~~~~

Elise claimed after some time of being here that she was Cherry The Tart. When she posted that she was Cherry The Tart after being here for quite some time as Elise, the pro-choicers didn't say a word and Foo just welcomed her back, laughing.

I do believe it really is Cherry The Tart based on the direction her posts have taken and going in the same crazy, senseless direction Cherry's always did when she couldn't refute the intelligence and truth in our posts. I do believe she wasn't saying she was Cherry The Tart just to pretend she was.

Who here, besides me, sees [the obvious] in that whole thing? lol

^^^That's all the attention you're getting from me, Elise. Enjoy it all now, you obsessed, small-minded, senseless freak. You honestly think you're being clever with your immature postings, and that's funny. Your purpose is to be used to show intelligent, sensible people who are indecisive about the abortion issue what kind of fools represent pro-choice here, and how irrational what they post is.

You've been doing a wonderful job at it, as have all the other pro-choice boneheads. Kudos!

I never said one wasn't older than the other. I'm also not the one trying to create an artificial difference in mental development to excuse the abuse of a child by the god you worship.

SeattleVehix44 wrote:

<quoted text>
",you are viewing everything from your particular perspective" - thats like saying its "MY perspective" that 14 years is OLDER than 12 - youre profoundly stupid
you gonna next say there's no difference bt 14 & 16? 16 & 18?