Autopsy Fails To Determine Cause Of Girl's Death

Okiegal57 wrote:

Law enforcement needs to find her skull, which will reveal the answer, to cause of death, I feel.

John wrote:

So where is the scam artist...oops I mean "psychic" that "talked to her"??
Something needs to be done to him for scamming the family.

Okiegal57 wrote:

<quoted text>
So, the skull was complete and intact, I gather. Was there no evidence shown?

Tulsa-Dad wrote:

I don't know how they can charge him with murder if they can't tell the cause of death. Who's to say she didn't choke on a chicken bone?? I don't mean to sound heartless but it's hard to charge him for murder if they can't say for sure she was murdered!

Okiegal57 wrote:

To SRH: Do I sense a little attitude problem with you? Perhaps, you should be the detective in charge of solving this case; since you know everything, and everyone else is so stupid...

Okiegal57 wrote:

To SRH: Do I sense a little attitude problem with you? Perhaps, you should be the detective in charge of solving this case; since you know everything, and everyone else is so stupid...

Darlene wrote:

<quoted text>Geez I don't sense any kind of attitude with SRH, sounds more like common sense to me!!!

Trained Observer wrote:

<quoted text>
I read that 3 times and I still can't figure out what your point is.

BUM wrote:

<quoted text> I'm basing this on having had happen that my grandson drown in the Arkansas River with an witness whom filed a police/sheriffs report which was ignored and dropped.(This same person did his very best effort to save the boy just short of being drowned himself). Why? With this witness agreeing to testify??????????
The second reason is viable proof of my daughter being raped with DNA proof along with physical evidence with clothing and along with vialed proof of an rented office space connected with proof of co conspiracy to use the space for rape of a minor 15 year old. Yet the local elected DA decides to not file (be abreast that my daughter agreed to testify fully and submit to DNA and did) charges in both unrelated incidences a few years apart. So which factual part of my statement do you not understand unless it is that you yourself do not believe our system of justice is bias to pick that and whom is important enough to go after if it benefits that electional future of the DA's office?

Trained Observer wrote:

<quoted text>
I read that 3 times and I still can't figure out what your point is.

Trained Observer wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not trying to pick on you. But, your spelling and grammar, I’m sorry to say, is very poor. Your last posting only reinforced my comment that it is hard to understand your point.
Please don’t be mad at that and I empathize with your frustration. I just wanted you to understand why I said that I could not comprehend your posting/point.
If I’m alone in that opinion, then maybe I’m in the wrong.

SRH wrote:

<quoted text>
Whats wrong with the spelling and grammar? I got the point the first time I read it. There was nothing wrong with spelling and grammar though I didn't nick pick every single word.

Judged:

1

1

1

SRH wrote:

<quoted text>
For one if that was the case then Bullock would have said that instead of giving several different stories and taken her to the hospital for help. Not dump her by the paintball place. Go figure.
Would you take her to the hospital if she was choking on a chicken bone or dump her someone and run. Dont take a genius to figure that out.

Judged:

1

confused wrote:

<quoted text>
For being such a smart ass and not reading the first page of these entries, the questions and statements have all already been refered to but hte funniest part about you is you typed this, "if she was choking on a chicken bone or dumpe her SOMEONE..."
rolling on the floor in hysterics I about peed my pants. Istead of somewhere.
Yes Marcus did confess already, they have recovered all of the clothes that were covered in her blood out of the dumpster of the walmart at 81st and lewis, and his car was covered with her blood also. I am guessing they don't think she was strangled or choked on something... that is obsurd. I do believe that the Psychic was somewhat right but no one is perfect and they did in no way hire him, he was already in Woodward looking for another child and said she spoke to him while he was here. No one is perfect but he got the wooded area right just not in the right area of town.

non sense wrote:

give the family closure, do you know that the family probably reads this all the time. this is ridiculous..... poor girl and poor family.. god bless you all.

SRH wrote:

<quoted text>
I really don't understand what you are getting at. Nothing bad is being said except petty crap over nit picking over bad grammar and spelling when any normal person could probably read between the lines and get what kind of point the person is trying to get across. Just petty. I guess that is my problem I don't pay attention to it and over look petty crap and just read between the mistakes and decipher the point that was coming across. I sure wouldn't post on here that "Hey you got bad grammar and you spell like crap" How hurtful is that? Just petty. Life is short to be posting on a message board calling people names on here just because you don't agree with something or you don't understand what they are saying instead of asking to clarify what they are saying so that you can get the point that is being made. If you take me as a smart *** thats your choice to take it the wrong way. All I can say is I'm not trying to be one. I read the article then started reading the posts from page one then posted my comments. Someone got petty over someone who they assumed didn't practice good grammar and spelling in the post so I went back to read it to see if I can help decipher the point that the person was trying to get across. I got it the 1st time reading it.
Though I didn't go through and check to see if all the commas, periods and hyphens were in the correct spot or if the words were spelled correctly, but hey if I'm in a hurry I don't go back and check my work either. I would hope that most people would read and it know what I meant not dog me because of poor grammar or spelling. But being a smart *** and posting back being one is so petty. So posting back being smart about me having to ask is petty and looking for a fight if you ask me. I just don't understand why people have to be so mean. Life is too short for that crap.