Australia's 550 Troops Will Return Home From Iraq

Jammy Jester wrote:

<quoted text>
you misunderstand ...
if australians were concerned about human rights they would have shot themselves after they killed, brutalised, murdered and subjugated the aboriginal peoples for fun.
come on, seriously, recent history shows australia has a warped sense of moral values. maybe australia is just a little short sighted when it comes to human rights abuses.

Kazzi wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for answering. Did the other people (for example, parents) put Aussies down while watching the cricket, like Aussies did with Poms, like 'those bloody Poms'?

dee wrote:

<quoted text>
"they would have shot themselves after they killed, brutalised, murdered and subjugated the aboriginal peoples for fun."
Maybe one day you'll shoot yourself for indulging in wild hyperbole and purple prose and believing every allegation-without-proof that comes your way.

Jammy Jester wrote:

<quoted text>
i cheered for the aussies

Kazzi wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks. I had been wondering if maybe you had been turned against Aussies as a youngster. Thanks for answering. Have a good day.

Jammy Jester wrote:

<quoted text>
i have not turned against the aussies. i have a dislike for those who perpetuate ignorance, those who ignore the consequences of atrocities and those who trample on others for the love of money or status.

high rises on the range wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that because you're a broke loser who can't get any satisfaction out of life? Life sucks doesn't it Jammy?

Jammy Jester wrote:

<quoted text>
are you saying if i was to kill people and take away their land i would be rich and happy, is that actually attainable without becoming conceited.

Judged:

1

high rises on the range wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I'm just saying you're not rich and not happy. What being concieted has to do with that beats the shit out of me..lol. Why don't you have a strong coffee and think about this a minute. Anybody living in in a nation which isn't of their racial origin is obviously a stranger in a strange land because they've either murdered the native inhabitants and stolen their riches/rescources, or were taken there in chains to do hard labor. Which one was it for your forefathers Jammy? Did they get dragged away from Africa in chains? They were lucky to get to their destination, because 3 out of every 5 black slaves died in transit. I wonder how many tens of millions of your ancestors and brethren died at the hands of their white masters, or were just cast into the sea to feed the sharks, because they died of starvation themselves? Living for months below deck in excrement and vomit, not necessarily their own. Sound familiar? People in chains on boats being taken to a strange land to slave away for the rest of their miserable lives? You apply this futile 'racial' argument to demonise those of one race. When many of that race had suffered as much as any other, had no say in where they found themselves, were raped, tortured and murdered at the hands of their charges and basically lived through a life of hell. How can you possibly sit back their in England on your high moral horse and point the finger at an entire nation that was born through as much suffering as anywhere, regardless of which race you align yourself with and even sleep at night? Do you think white people have never been born into suffering? How incredibly naive you are.

Judged:

1

Jammy Jester wrote:

<quoted text>
in comparison to the aboriginal peoples, white people have hardily suffered.

high rises on the range wrote:

<quoted text>
White people will never suffer enough for a racist like you. Can't wait til the Uk brings in the conscription and sends the likes of yourself to go and fight with all the white boys. You'll see who suffers then you dickhead.

Judged:

1

1

Jammy Jester wrote:

<quoted text>
i do not like to see anyone suffer.
unless you consider giving back stolen property as a form of suffering.