The President has failed us

Crickets chirping:

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

So Funny.

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

If there is a counter-analysis by a credible organization that has run the numbers and reached a different conclusion, I hope you'll post the link.

A "credible organization" is unbias, not one where the author has visited the White House 12 times and the other author once worked for B.O.

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>
This is again the innuendo, and I flat out reject it. I continue to be consistent in my analysis of why I don't think Romney has a better plan for America.

Here is the reality of Romney's promises:

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/201...

In this case, Romney has promised at least five big things. They are:
To start, he’d make all of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent but repeal the 2009 Obama tax cuts and the tax increases included in the 2010 health reform law.*(* harms low wage workers)
After that, he’d cut tax rates by 20 percent across the board and eliminate both the Alternative Minimum Tax and the estate tax.
He’d eliminate taxes on investment income for couples making $200,000 or less (individuals making $100,000 or less) and keep current low rates for those with high incomes.
He’d do this without increasing the budget deficit (beyond the cost of extending the 2001-2003 tax cuts) by curbing some tax preferences.
He’d do it in a way that retains the progressivity of today’s tax system.
.... cutting rates this deeply without adding to the deficit or raising taxes on capital income would require massive cuts in those popular tax preferences that overwhelmingly benefit the middle- and upper middle-class. Brown, Gale, and Looney figure that tax breaks such as the deductions for mortgage interest and charitable giving or the exclusion for employer sponsored health insurance would have to be cut by as much as 65 percent for Romney’s plan to add up.(Cont.)

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/201...

(Co-Author:)

*Adam Looney*

is a senior fellow in Economic Studies and policy director of The Hamilton Project. His research focuses on tax policy, labor economics, inequality and social policy.

**Previously, Looney was the senior economist for public finance and tax policy with the President’s Council of Economic Advisers**

and has been an economist at the Federal Reserve Board.

Which adds up to a "BIAS" report!

WASHINGTON,DC (AP) The President enjoyed a 10oz Kobe beef steak and the first lady mowed down 3 plates of ribs.Afterwards the president returned home where he mounted his wifes 220lb backside.There were plenty of leftovers.

And:

Written By Howard Gleckman,**Guest blogger**/ August 3, 2012

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/201 ...

LOL!!!

It's cheaper than the $45,000.00 per plate he charged retards at George clowneys house

NTRPRNR1 is even more clueless than Rose...if that's even possible.

"Okay! "How cool of you to post an OPINION PIECE as facts."

Is Howard Gleckman "Guest Blogger" the same as someone writing an "Opinion" piece??

Just wondering.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/201 ...

PlacitasRoy wrote:

OBAMA'S POLICIES AND GOVERNANCE IS BULLSHIT! BULSHIT!! BULLSHIT!!!

No doubt about that!!

LiboTards Unite wrote:

WASHINGTON,DC (AP) The President enjoyed a 10oz Kobe beef steak and the first lady mowed down 3 plates of ribs.Afterwards the president returned home where he mounted his wifes 220lb backside.There were plenty of leftovers.

I heard that it was Moochelle that gobbled down Kobe's tube steak.

Cricket 23 wrote:

<quoted text>
Example of B.O.'s "strong principles"!
Obama and the National Anthem
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Obama Bows to Saudi King v2 Extra Footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Nancy Lieber, International Committee chair of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, wrote a June 30, 1981 letter to Danielle Page, a staffer for Canadian Member of Parliament Ian Waddell.
Dear Danielle Page, I'm sending along a list of Congresspeople and senators who know about us, democratic socialism, and -- perhaps Canada. Only the first one is an open socialist, but the others are sympathetic in varying degrees.
The list was;
Congressman Ron Dellums
Congressman Byron Dorgan (North Dakota)
Congressman Steven Solarz
Congressman Ted Weiss
Congressman Barney Frank
Congressman Gerry Studds
Congressman Robert Kastenmeier
Congressman John Conyers
Congressman Harold Washington
Congressman David Obey
Congressman Les Aspin
Congresswoman Barbara Mikulski
Senator Ted Kennedy
Hope this is of help and you recruit them to the cause! In Solidarity,

Comrades,the use of the term Solidarity tells it all!!!
Bwarney Fwank,John Conyers,Huh??????????
Still doing their Commie Mole thing in the WH.... c

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/learn/issu... -

support-amnesty.html

Groups that Support Amnesty

The following groups have all announced that they support a mass amnesty. The groups are divided into four separate categories, including: advocacy, business, unions and religious denominations. We have provided the contact information for each group, and if you are affiliated with one or more of these organizations, we encourage you to contact them to express your opposition to their position.
Business Groups
Chamber of Commerce (U.S.)
PHONE:(at the link)
Toll Free:(at the link)
EMAIL:(at the link)

WHAT!!!

"Groups that Support Amnesty" Start with the White House!

Administration Officials Deny Granting Back-Door Amnesty

The House Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security held a hearing
Tuesday to examine the impact that recent Obama Administration policies are
having on border security. At issue were a series of memos issued by U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director John Morton encouraging
agents to ignore certain categories of illegal aliens and the Homeland
Security Department's (DHS) August announcement it would begin reviewing
deportation proceedings on a case-by-case basis and releasing those illegal
aliens it does not consider a "priority." (Washington Times, Aug. 18, 2011;
FAIR Legislative Update, June 27, 2011)

During her opening statement, Subcommittee Chairwoman Candice Miller (R-MI)
declared these policies tantamount to an executive amnesty by the Obama
Administration. "I think when you have the potential to administratively
close hundreds of thousands of removal cases it sends a message, and that
message is clear: that if you make it past the border you're scot- free and
that you can stay here despite breaking our immigration laws unless you
commit a serious crime, and even then there's no guarantee that these
illegal aliens will be deported and sent back to their home. So this action
by the administration is clearly administrative amnesty." (See Chairwoman
Miller's Opening Statement, Oct. 4, 2011)

Administration officials, however, denied their policies grant amnesty to
illegal aliens. When Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) asked Deputy ICE Director
Kumar Kibble if the administration's policies allow noncriminal aliens to
stay in this country and apply for work permits, Kibble's response was, "No.
That doesn't appropriately characterize the policy..They can certainly apply
for work authorization, but there is no automatic grant .." Instead, Kibble
referred to the policy of releasing illegal aliens into the public and
granting work authorization to them as merely a means of "unclogging the
immigration court docket" so the agency can accelerate its "high-priority"
cases. Chief Michael Fisher of the U.S. Border Patrol agreed that the best
way to "unclog" the overburdened immigration system is to release illegal
aliens. "[I]t's certainly CBP's perspective," he said "[that] when you look
at the prosecutorial discretion memo that Director Morton signed.it's going
to allow us more detention capability for those entrants that we apprehend
between the ports of entry, and from a prioritized enforcement standpoint we
do support that."

Read rest of story below:

http://www.fairus.org/site/News2...

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>First off, this is NOT WaPos analysis. It's their assessment that the analysis of the TPC was credible and essentially correct. Nobody is asking anybody to work harder or longer for less. Taxpayers in the top 1% aren't going to go to work an hour earlier or stay fifteen minutes longer in the d*mned board room because they sustained a tax increase. All the percentage gyration machinations in the world have no impact on this reality. They're already sitting on a couple Trillion dollars in cash reserves.

In sum, if you assume a bunch of stuff, include a bunch of stuff that Romney never said and then leave out all of Romney’s other policies, then Romney’s plan doesn’t work. TPC does this in the guise of “assumptions,” which President Obama’s ads and pro-Obama pundits leave out.(This is not unlike the Obama team’s “outsourcing” gambit, in which a much more limited factual assertion gets used for a much broader, unsupported political assertion.)

In short, TPC does not provide the silver bullet for slaying Romney’s tax plans that Obama supporters would tell you it does. All it says is that a left-wing tax think tank can come up with a hypothetical in which Romney’s plan would not be possible.

As a final aside, the standard for specificity in a campaign Romney is supposed to adhere to, if you listen to Obama’s team and/or the media, is a far cry from the way it worked in 2008 or from that applied in this campaign to Obama. In 2008 it was fine for Obama simply to say he wouldn’t raise taxes on the rich and would go line-by-line through the budget (neither of which turned out to be true). So far, other than the Buffett tax gambit and a hike in corporate tax rates, we’ve seen nothing from Obama that comes close to the level of detail provided by Romney’s team on tax reform.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-tur...

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/22/rach...

Rachel Maddow Tells Us About The Etch-A-Sketch candidate.

LOL!!!

Rachel Maddow: Frequent White House Visitor

By Alexander Abad-Santos | The Atlantic Wire

A look at visitor logs from The White House has MSNBC's star being cleared
to enter The White House seven times and meeting with Obama face-to-face
three of those times--a number on par with King Abdullah of Jordan. That's
what the conservative-leaning Neil Munro at the conservative-leaning Daily
Caller reports.(Munro's piece doesn't state the specificities of how far
back he looked at the logs--it looks as though the visits are all from this
past year.) He concludes, "Rachel Maddow is the president's favorite media
hack." Sure, the piece gives reasons as to why Maddow's visits are out of
the ordinary (her ratings aren't as good as Fox's) and insinuates that The
President is being wasteful with his time (King Abdullah has the same amount
of visits), and that her visits mean that she's more better liked than
Arianna Huffington and Fareed Zakaria--all of which are subjective
conclusions which are arguably all up for debate.

Read rest of story below:

http://news.yahoo.com/rachel-maddow-frequent-...

There are about 3.5 unemployed workers for every job opening, compared with 7 for every opening in 2009

A group of 15 military organizations filed a motion to intervene in a voting lawsuit filed by Obama for America, the Democratic National Committee and the Ohio Democratic Party against Ohio’s Secretary of State John Husted and Attorney General Mike DeWine.

National Guard Association of the United States,
Association of the United States Army,
Association of the United States Navy,
Marine Corps League,
Military Officers Association of America,
Reserve Officers Association,
National Association for Uniformed Services,
Non Commissioned Officers Association of the USA,
Army Reserve Association,
Fleet Reserve Association,
Special Forces Association,
U.S. Army Ranger Association Inc.,
AMVETS,
National Defense Committee,
Military Order of the World Wars.

http://watchdog.org/46658/oh-military-groups-...

Cricket 23 wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL!!!
Rachel Maddow: Frequent White House Visitor
By Alexander Abad-Santos | The Atlantic Wire
A look at visitor logs from The White House has MSNBC's star being cleared
to enter The White House seven times and meeting with Obama face-to-face
three of those times--a number on par with King Abdullah of Jordan. That's
what the conservative-leaning Neil Munro at the conservative-leaning Daily
Caller reports.(Munro's piece doesn't state the specificities of how far
back he looked at the logs--it looks as though the visits are all from this
past year.) He concludes, "Rachel Maddow is the president's favorite media
hack." Sure, the piece gives reasons as to why Maddow's visits are out of
the ordinary (her ratings aren't as good as Fox's) and insinuates that The
President is being wasteful with his time (King Abdullah has the same amount
of visits), and that her visits mean that she's more better liked than
Arianna Huffington and Fareed Zakaria--all of which are subjective
conclusions which are arguably all up for debate.
Read rest of story below:
http://news.yahoo.com/rachel-maddow-frequent-...

You're on the wrong forum, there is one just for you gossip and innuendo lurking trolls - it's called "my Momma always said stupid is as stupid does"

Dumb Lib Turds shouldn't be allowed out of the trailer park

Today in History:

One Year Ago Today, America’s Triple-A Credit Rating Was Cut For The First Time In History
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405311...

Obama administration remained in denial until it happen

“When people were most worried about the stability of the world, they still found safety in the Treasuries and the dollar," he continued. "That is a very, very important sign of basic confidence in our capacity as a country to work together to fix these problems.”
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2010/02/...

LiboTards Unite wrote:

Dumb Lib Turds shouldn't be allowed out of the trailer park

Have a chick-fil-a you'll feel better :-)