GAY2AFRIKA :: Go Gay on Safari

milktert wrote:

<quoted text>
I would LOVE to witness that! ;)

You probably would until I tell you my friend is on the masculine looking side... LOL However, she somehow manages to get some very pretty straight girls.

milktert wrote:

<quoted text>
I would LOVE to witness that! ;)

Do you even understand how hypocrital you and your crew sound with a stupid statement like this?
Your preaching against homosexuality on one hand, and saying you want to watch it for pleasure on the other hand.

No really, are you all really THAT STUPID?
Because I question those IQ tests you like to post.

Feelix wrote:

<quoted text>Do you even understand how hypocrital you and your crew sound with a stupid statement like this?
Your preaching against homosexuality on one hand, and saying you want to watch it for pleasure on the other hand.
No really, are you all really THAT STUPID?
Because I question those IQ tests you like to post.

Go back to the "SF" AA Forum, simpleton!

Bunniluvsyou wrote:

<quoted text>You probably would until I tell you my friend is on the masculine looking side... LOL However, she somehow manages to get some very pretty straight girls.

I knew a girl like that who used to live near me up to a few months ago. She was very young and good looking, even though she tried to look like a boy by dressing in boys clothes and even have her hair cut short. You wouldn't recognise her as a girl from a distance but close up she is stunning. She was always surrounded by pretty girls who were obviously straight as in the case of your friend, she has a masterly coolness about her. And as in your case she lived with a straight woman while here. I think she still does because they moved away together. The woman had three children, though still good looking,slim and neat. They were both very friendly and I visited them a few times.

Botha wrote:

<quoted text>
Meaning what?
It is you and your butt buddy Syd that should be excited.
But I would rather have harmless gays go on these safaris than the dumb rambos who go there to hunt and shoot animals for fun. It is these scum that should be banned from Africa and not the gays.

I want to go there and hunt kaffirs in all honesty. The animals not necessary for sustenance would be safe from me.

Feelix wrote:

<quoted text>Do you even understand how hypocrital you and your crew sound with a stupid statement like this?
Your preaching against homosexuality on one hand, and saying you want to watch it for pleasure on the other hand.
No really, are you all really THAT STUPID?
Because I question those IQ tests you like to post.

That is BS. Even the homosexuals acknowledge it is normal for a heterosexual male to be aroused by lesbians. On the surface it sounds hypocritical, but in reality people are aroused and repulsed by a very wide variety of things. Many most won't even admit to...lol

Homosexuality is a mutation. Sadly, a non beneficial one. I pity people cursed with it, but I don't hate them. I could careless what they do if I don't have to watch.

G-Dubba-you wrote:

<quoted text>
That is BS. Even the homosexuals acknowledge it is normal for a heterosexual male to be aroused by lesbians. On the surface it sounds hypocritical, but in reality people are aroused and repulsed by a very wide variety of things. Many most won't even admit to...lol
Homosexuality is a mutation. Sadly, a non beneficial one. I pity people cursed with it, but I don't hate them. I could careless what they do if I don't have to watch.

No it is normal to watch a man and woman together, watching two women together is Not normal.
You need electric shock treatment to correct that abnormalty.
And I'm the ONE to do it for you.

G-Dubba-you wrote:

<quoted text>
That is BS. Even the homosexuals acknowledge it is normal for a heterosexual male to be aroused by lesbians. On the surface it sounds hypocritical, but in reality people are aroused and repulsed by a very wide variety of things. Many most won't even admit to...lol
Homosexuality is a mutation. Sadly, a non beneficial one. I pity people cursed with it, but I don't hate them. I could careless what they do if I don't have to watch.

Oh , now we are taking advise from homosexuals? Who cares what they think? They like hairy buttholes, instead of the beauty of a woman. Just darn unatuural. Electric shock treatment for them too. Put a big picture of a hairy butt hole in front of them, then a big shock until the hairy butthole becomes associated with the electrical shock.
Works on dogs.
Why not humans?
Worth a try.

Felix wrote:

<quoted text>Oh , now we are taking advise from homosexuals? Who cares what they think? They like hairy buttholes, instead of the beauty of a woman. Just darn unatuural. Electric shock treatment for them too. Put a big picture of a hairy butt hole in front of them, then a big shock until the hairy butthole becomes associated with the electrical shock.
Works on dogs.
Why not humans?
Worth a try.

Are you fawking drunk?
Your grammar and speech went well over the deep end.
You seem well versed in electric butthole shock. Do you shock your German Shepherd's butthole from time to time?
I may have to report you for beastiality Felix.

Feelix wrote:

<quoted text>Do you even understand how hypocrital you and your crew sound with a stupid statement like this?
Your preaching against homosexuality on one hand, and saying you want to watch it for pleasure on the other hand.
No really, are you all really THAT STUPID?
Because I question those IQ tests you like to post.

Yes it's double standards Niccuh. I have very compared to the likes of sock puppet touting wogs like you. Male homosexuality makes me want to vomit. In fact, so does female homosexuality if one of more participants looks like Roseanne Barr. However, the sight of two pairs of nubile breasts brushing up against each is all it takes for things down south to go, well north. ;)

* very few

G-Dubba-you wrote:

<quoted text>
That is BS. Even the homosexuals acknowledge it is normal for a heterosexual male to be aroused by lesbians. On the surface it sounds hypocritical, but in reality people are aroused and repulsed by a very wide variety of things. Many most won't even admit to...lol
Homosexuality is a mutation. Sadly, a non beneficial one. I pity people cursed with it, but I don't hate them. I could careless what they do if I don't have to watch.

I believe homosexuality has an environmental explanation.
The APA puts homosexuality as being caused by Cognitive,Biological,and Environmental factors.There is no evidence of a gay gene,there is evidence that molestation can result in developing homosexual tendencies,there is evidence that an enmenshed father or mother can cause homosexual tendancies.There is even evidence that ones thinking regarding the matter of homosexuality can cause homosexual tendancies.My belief is that homosexual thoughts are present in all individuals,but that suppression of homosexuality is vital for males to use reaction formation to develop protective stances against other men and maintain a sense of competitiveness amongst their male counterparts.

http://changingminds.org/explanations/behavio...

G-Dubba-you wrote:

I didn't click the link when I made my first comment, just went for the one liner.
After clicking it I am rather disgusted. American homosexuals wanting to go pick up new strains of HIV from Africa? WTF is this? I hope the boons either deny them entry or just rob and eat them...

"We are kind of two communities that are so vastly divorced from one another, yet we have so many common threads between both of our communities that I think we can weave them together to the common good of Africa and the LGBT community, I really do. I think there are sufficient threads of commonality that can be woven and create something absolutely incredible for the future enhancement of those communities as time goes by."
...

I think a more concise tiltle would be 'sex tourism for gays and/or pedophiles'. Supposedly that lands you in a prison in Thailand so this travel development should come as no surprise.

Lord Whiteman wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe homosexuality has an environmental explanation.
The APA puts homosexuality as being caused by Cognitive,Biological,and Environmental factors.There is no evidence of a gay gene,there is evidence that molestation can result in developing homosexual tendencies,there is evidence that an enmenshed father or mother can cause homosexual tendancies.There is even evidence that ones thinking regarding the matter of homosexuality can cause homosexual tendancies.My belief is that homosexual thoughts are present in all individuals,but that suppression of homosexuality is vital for males to use reaction formation to develop protective stances against other men and maintain a sense of competitiveness amongst their male counterparts.
http://changingminds.org/explanations/behavio...

No homosexual thoughts are not present in all individuals, that's just absurd.They have done studies on Homosexuality, and have alot of theories, but nothing is proven to cause homosexuality.

Lord Whiteman wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe homosexuality has an environmental explanation.
The APA puts homosexuality as being caused by Cognitive,Biological,and Environmental factors.There is no evidence of a gay gene,there is evidence that molestation can result in developing homosexual tendencies,there is evidence that an enmenshed father or mother can cause homosexual tendancies.There is even evidence that ones thinking regarding the matter of homosexuality can cause homosexual tendancies.My belief is that homosexual thoughts are present in all individuals,but that suppression of homosexuality is vital for males to use reaction formation to develop protective stances against other men and maintain a sense of competitiveness amongst their male counterparts.
http://changingminds.org/explanations/behavio...

Here's the statistics, and they have always remained the same through out the ages, if it seems like there are more homosexuals, it's just that they are not hiding it anymore.

Most of us fail to understand why anyone would want to engage in homosexual activity. To the average person, the very idea is either puzzling or repugnant. Indeed, a recent survey (1) indicated that only 14% of men and 10% of women imagined that such behavior could old any "possibility of enjoyment."

And the reason there are more male homosexuals is the sexual nature of men.
Women are more discerning and aren't fooled by something not real.
You put up a cardboard picture of a female turkey and the male turkey will try to mate with it.
Same for human males.

The evil pornography movement have tried everything to get women hooked on pornography, and have miserably failed in all their endeavors.

Hi all,

I would really like to sign up for this safari !
Where can I get more info ? Ooooooo , I'm really looking forward to this !

BTW , now you know what the BA stands for:

BANG ASS FOREVER..........brokeback monkeys !!!

Foie Gras Fox wrote:

<quoted text>
I think a more concise tiltle would be 'sex tourism for gays and/or pedophiles'. Supposedly that lands you in a prison in Thailand so this travel development should come as no surprise.

People are getting more sophisticated these days, it is part of evolution, but as always in evolution it is the relatively few that lead into the next step, the majority always remain stuck in their thinking and ways and opposed to any evolutionary progress. It usually takes many years for the rest to catch up.

Felix wrote:

<quoted text>No homosexual thoughts are not present in all individuals, that's just absurd.

View the Kinsley report.Most homosexual have desires at some point in their lives for the opposite sex,most heterosexuals at some point in their lives have desires for the same sex.

Parts of the Kinsey Reports regarding diversity in sexual orientations are frequently used to support the common estimate of 10% for homosexuality in the general population. However, the findings are not as absolute, and Kinsey himself avoided and disapproved of using terms like homosexual or heterosexual to describe individuals, asserting that sexuality is prone to change over time, and that sexual behavior can be understood both as physical contact as well as purely psychological phenomena (desire, sexual attraction, fantasy).[citation needed] Instead of three categories (heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual), a seven-category Kinsey Scale system was used.

The reports also state that nearly 46% of the male subjects had "reacted" sexually to persons of both sexes in the course of their adult lives, and 37% had at least one homosexual experience.[5] 11.6% of white males (ages 20–35) were given a rating of 3 (about equal heterosexual and homosexual experience/response) throughout their adult lives.[6] The study also reported that 10% of American males surveyed were "more or less exclusively homosexual for at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55" (in the 5 to 6 range).[7]

7% of single females (ages 20–35) and 4% of previously married females (ages 20–35) were given a rating of 3 (about equal heterosexual and homosexual experience/response) on Kinsey Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale for this period of their lives.[8] 2 to 6% of females, aged 20–35, were more or less exclusively homosexual in experience/response,[9] and 1 to 3% of unmarried females aged 20–35 were exclusively homosexual in experience/respons

Felix wrote:

<quoted text>
They have done studies on Homosexuality, and have alot of theories, but nothing is proven to cause homosexuality.

There is no conclusive explanation of what causes homosexuality but there is evidence for various explanation.