COMMENT: A New Theory on Line?

Kasim Pantalun wrote:

what next?
for you, nothing, as usual.

Colonialist Malaysia wrote:

<quoted text>\
Illegal Sabah occupier Federation of Malaya masquerading as Malaysia should increase the rental being paid to the Sultan of Sulu and Sabah to $ 30 billion dollars annually and not $ 1500.00 dollars.

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
Seeing it belongs to that peoples who have hereditary title to their belonging together as a different race of peoples why can't these choose to annul the contract and be the owner of their own future in their own land ?

Colonialist Malaysia wrote:

<quoted text>
You are right when you said hereditary title. The Sultan of Sulu and Sabah is the owner of Sabah as evidenced by the fact that illegal Sabah occupier Federation of Malaya masquerading as Malaysia is paying rental money in the amount of $1500.00 dollars yearly.
Different race? People of the Philippines are of the same race. The Sulu archipelago and parts of Mindanao was never conquered by the Spaniards and not converted to Christianity.
The Sultan of Sulu and Sabah own Sabah. The treaties that were signed by them and other parties cannot be annulled by just one side. It should also be signed by the other to make it official. Without both signatures as was in the original contract no annulment ever transpired.
Once the Sultan of Sulu and Sabah and illegal Sabah occupier Federation of Malaya(Malaysia) straightened up the wrong that was done by the British when it was illegally transferred to Federation of Malaya, Sabahans could then determine their own future and their own destiny in their part of the world.
Sabahans and Sarawakians should declare their independence since they did not agree to be the 12th and 13th states of the Federation of Malaya.
This is wrong.
Absolutely wrong.
did not agree to become

Neville Thompson wrote:

That being Temple Bar

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
One way to solve it would be for the original contract holder, that being Great Britain to take back the lands under a UN charter and either return them to the Sultun or hold a referendum of the population to ask you of what your direction is either with the Sultun or without to form your own future.
I think the contracts of foreign ownership are at Temble Bar in The City of London

Neville Thompson wrote:

That being Temple Bar

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
One way to solve it would be for the original contract holder, that being Great Britain to take back the lands under a UN charter and either return them to the Sultun or hold a referendum of the population to ask you of what your direction is either with the Sultun or without to form your own future.
I think the contracts of foreign ownership are at Temble Bar in The City of London

Anthony Eden_HamBurger wrote:

<quoted text>
It would be nice if Great Britain would step in to solve once and for all the problem that would not have been a problem if Sabah wasn't transferred to re-colonizer Federation of Malaya masquerading as Malaysia.
Great Britain would be kind enough to help the people of Sabah and Sarawak determine their own future in their part of the world, and also to help the Sultan of Sulu and Sabah rest her case after receiving natural justice to her rightful claim of Sabah.
Britain

dukun wrote:

yeah and suddenly when we invade 'occupy' country suddenly it's WRONG?? Indonesia invaded Timor Leste is WRONG but Dutch enslaving and invading Indonesia for centuries are right? Dont dictate us about human rights, you're way worse

Kasim Pantalun wrote:

<quoted text>
its already being done long ago in 1962! try to catch up on history will you?
see 'cobbold commission'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobbold_Commissi...
About one-third of the population of each territory strongly favours early realisation of Malaysia without too much concern about terms and conditions. Another third, many of them favourable to the Malaysia project, ask, with varying degrees of emphasis, for conditions and safeguards varying in nature and extent: the warmth of support among this category would be markedly influenced by a firm expression of opinion by Governments that the detailed arrangements eventually agreed upon are in the best interests of the territories. The remaining third is divided between those who insist on independence before Malaysia is considered and those who would strongly prefer to see British rule continue for some years to come. If the conditions and reservations which they have put forward could be substantially met, the second category referred to above would generally support the proposals. Moreover once a firm decision was taken quite a number of the third category would be likely to abandon their opposition and decide to make the best of a doubtful job. There will remain a hard core, vocal and politically active, which will oppose Malaysia on any terms unless it is preceded by independence and self-government: this hard core might amount to near 20 per cent of the population of Sarawak and somewhat less in North Borneo.
—Lord Cobbold, Cobbold Commission
overwhelming majority preferred joining malaysia. nthere's no mention of phillipina at all. none of the natives consider joining them.

Anthony Eden_HamBurger wrote:

<quoted text>
Or that the original contract was destroyed together with the rest of documents related to the British Empire last year or couple of years ago?

Anthony Eden_HamBurger wrote:

<quoted text>
Or that the original contract was destroyed together with the rest of documents related to the British Empire last year or couple of years ago?

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
Historically speaking wouldn't that be a crime ?

Neville Thompson wrote:

<quoted text>
Everything would have been copied in micro which was the case for earlier work that was beyond repair.
It may also be available in their most prominent library as it is it's job to preserve history.

Kasim Pantalun wrote:

what next?
for you, nothing, as usual.