LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child

pupsy wrote:

<quoted text>
YES, I wrote an e-mail to topix about it.
I will also start an e-mail campain for others to do the same. Oh and yes, I admitted it on the thread for all to see ..........

as g.woodhouse@shaw.ca would say
adoption should be the option after the first

Brilliant wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes you are.
*I* do not insult ANYONE for their physical appearance, EXCEPT RC, because I CAN. SHE is the one that has been insulting of people that she thinks are inferior to her. THAT would be EVERYONE, in her weak little mind.
What she fails to understand, is that I am NOT inferior to her, even on my worst day. I roll out of bed looking better that she does, with all that crap spread an inch deep on her face. And I am OLDER! LOLOL.
The ONLY person that insults people, and has a hang up about physical appearance is RC. She probably went home and told her husband what a fat cow you were, and laughed while she was doing it.
So please get your overly emotional whine straight, would you?
It is OK though, RC is just insecure and inferior, and she knows it. That is why she keeps going on and on about HER looks and obsessing about why I have not posted a photo. She thinks she will be able to make fun of me, if I did post one. She couldn't.
I do wonder why she does not post one that is newer than 8 years old.........
~shrug~

Well, I didn't think that was an overly emotional whine, but anyway Rachel really shouldn't (I know she's not) feel insecure. She was very outgoing when we met and very fun. And I thought she was alot cuter than the picture here. I think I even said something like "Wow, you're really cute!" If she was insecure about anything, I didn't pick up on it at all. I met her intelligent brother and her sweet, fun daughter too. The only insecure one was me talking about my fat! I promise you she is a very cute person!

Do you honestly think I'm lying about meeting her? Or am I lying about the Rachel/Leslie drama? Is there more that I'm lying about? Didn't lie about either.

If I was you and I think I looked good, I would just post a picture to prove her wrong. You're not afraid of any insults are you? We've all (almost) shown a picture, why don't you?

If you get one thing from me here, please get that I am not a liar. That is an important quality in a person (honesty) and I do have that. I do call out people who say they're Christians and act rude and nasty to people and use the *F* bomb to convey their ugly point.(not like Christ at all) And I have been judgemental at times.(not like Christ either) And I have lashed out at people when I have been thoroughly and verbally trashed, but I have not lied.

I try to keep a cool head here, but when people insult for the stinking pleasure of it all, I get angry! And I feel that you did that with me and with others. Is it honestly fun to insult people? I'm being serious. I like a good comeback to a nasty remark, but an insult for the giggles of it isn't cool at all. And there are many here who do that.

I would STILL meet anyone here if I had the opportunity to. It seems we hate each other (how do you hate someone you don't truly know?) but I would meet you here in Idaho. I would like to meet alot of people here to see the REAL person behind the words. Like I said before, IF you truly knew me, you would like me. I don't have any enemies.

R C Honey wrote:

If she's that fragile, their are numbers she can call and people that she can pick out of a line up that can help her. Man..........

Or here's a thought Rachel, YOU could do the decent thing and let it go. What a concept huh?

Not that I think you really care what I think about this, and I have made an effort to say out of it, but I just felt I had to say that it seems to me you're using this to furhter your feud with Chicky, and it frankly, its cruel, its stupid, it sucks and it serves NO purpose EXCEPT to be hurtful.

That's it, I'm done with this nonsense on BOTH sides of the issue. I'm not sure you care one way or another what I or anyone else thinks, but I've said all I have to say about it.

pupsy wrote:

ABORTION = premediated annihilation of our unborn

Who's this "our" Katie? You sharing a uterus now? If so, will you take my period this month, I'm WAY over having cramps.

You DO realize its not "our" anything. Its A WOMAN'S choice, singular. YOU'RE not part of the decision OR the equation at all.

polymath257 wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course. But there are two big mistakes we can make: the first is to think we know more than we do. The other is to think we understand less.

Actually, there is a third: to presume that just because our current technological limits definitively define something, does not mean that we should reduce our vigilance in exploring it further.

z3ncat wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, what an amazingly Christian thing to say, Barneyboy! Jesus must be patting you on the back for that one, because it so clearly emulates the message he tried to pass on.
Gods, what a self-righteous hypocrite you are.

You People keep being ignorant and saying ignorant things putty cat.

pupsy wrote:

<quoted text>
So, it has been shoved down my throat constantly for the last 2 days ..
So, she gets a free card to act like this ??
Huh ??
Laughing at me as I am falsely accused by a shriveled up old bag ??
Psst, I too have been beaten, not raped but beaten. So, I guess that will justify me to do as I wish, huh ??

I'm sorry to hear that you were beaten. That's horrible. I've never had physical trauma, only emotional. I'm lucky.

j-m laughed at you? Are you sure? I don't remember seeing that. She hasn't been on that much lately.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, Flo, that is the post she posted to Pupsy on the other 'mock pupsy' thread. But, if your implying that she's referring to me...that' okay with me. I'd rather she be talking about me.

No not implying she is talking about you either.

Big Sky wrote:

Yet, if she so cares for her own emotional well being, its ridiculous that she even took the time to get on such a forum...clearly started as vengeance towards Pupsy.

It will be removed I'm sure. I don't understand why you would find it ridiculous tho.

Big Sky wrote:

I suppose it should not surprise any pro lifer what lengths people would go to to hurt others....who would clearly support ending the life of their own developing babies.
At one time...I would've thought totally different, but I've been proved wrong. Those who would abort their own developing child, we should never be surprised at who else they'd hurt.

Ow that hurt.(sarcasm)

So how many post abortive woman are sitting in jail cells vs. men that have killed them for not aborting or causing an abortion?

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep. But, as usual, he'll ignore it, claim it never happened.

That is because he loves his little men's room princess.

LOL.

And yes, I am the a.shole for caring what people like you thought rather than being there for my friend, but next time you blast out your blow hole about how righteous you are, think about your own childish games when it came to her.

Brilliant wrote:

<quoted text>
I was just thinking that Rachie might want a refund on her money, because the dipshit got the wrong information about MY education. LMAO. She is just too stupid to know it.
Looks like daddy wasted every penny of her college education considering she was suckingandfucking her way thru.
Have you met her son? She trapped her hubby in college. Well HE wasn't in college, she was slumming to do her deeds.

Hey, quick trip from Toronto ..
Did you see the CN Tower ??

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
So, why don't you post by who you really are? Problem?

I am Grace Woodhouse...Princess Extraordinaire...worship me little piggy...

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, you did..and we could go round and round and round and round on it. Or, you could post proof...instead of your repeated opinion.
Nope, I never ignored Mr Mary's words either, and you're not clear about 'what' it is I claim he didn't say...you only say 'it'. It'd be nice if you'd be clear and show proof.
But, if you'd rather go round and round and round and round?.........go on, I expect you're already dizzy. You sound like it.

Who are you kidding? Everyone here knows you will ignore what you dont want to see, you'll twist what you want to twist, and you'll justify the indefensible. You're got not one iota of integrity, no respect from anyone that matters, and anyone that trusts you further than they could throw you is stupider than you are.

Go have some more Mad Dog son. Destroy a few more brain cells.

truth-teller wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep! Started out that way! But no flower, he just um.....tucked.

Tucked? Tucked what, pray tell?

lalalulu wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, there is a third: to presume that just because our current technological limits definitively define something, does not mean that we should reduce our vigilance in exploring it further.

True enough.*Always* check and re-check and test and re-test to make sure you didn't make a mistake.

KiM wrote:

.
so you know, if you dont want a baby, then dont have sex.

OR give it up for adoption. OR have an abortion. Those are the choices available to ALL of us. Your approval isn't needed or cared about.

pupsy wrote:

<quoted text>
YES, I wrote an e-mail to topix about it.
I will also start an e-mail campain for others to do the same. Oh and yes, I admitted it on the thread for all to see ..........

If its not her real name why are you writing to topix??

lalalulu wrote:

<quoted text>
The link didn't work for me. What issues did the baby have?

The baby was born with two heads, one body. From the sounds of the article he has one set of organs, one body, and two fully formed heads.

The article stated that this was caused by one embryo having an anomaly of some sort. Johnny wondered how many souls this child would have according to the extremist crowd.

lalalulu wrote:

<quoted text>
I know I would.

I know I would too. AND now I now for sure. Vball is one cool chick!

*know* but in the future, I'm gonna assume y'all know what I meant.