|
Sue
Wayne, PA
|
z3ncat wrote: <quoted text> So it's okay for me to make claims about the sort of things that anti-choicers believe, even if there is nothing in this thread that can be used to back those claims up? I can just make any wild, outrageous claim, because those of us debating on this forum are apparently gifted with the ability to speak for everyone on our respective sides? You know the claims made are only made about those on this forum, or are made with the ability to back them up with outside evidence. So once again: either tell us who here supports third-trimester abortions, or admit that you're just coming up with unsubstantiated claims. I never said that people here supoport late term abortions (although I suspect that some do). However there are many abortion supporters that do, Hilary Clinton jumps to mind, and if I recall correctly there were about 30 other congressmen who also voted to keep late term abortions legal.
|
Joined: Jun 3, 2008
Comments: 1099
Meriden, CT
|
justme2not you wrote: <quoted text> and you guys call yourself people who fight against murders and killing?????????? interesting.... so people who die during the bombing like mothers and fathers and doctors adn other children are not worth leaving?????????? so it's ok to kill them but not ok to prevent a fetus from developing?????????? i am sorry, but r you people ok??????? Now who is being one sided> I did not approve of hat he did.
|
|
“What do you mean by that?”
Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Comments: 11636
Phoenix, AZ
|
FOO:If your stance is so morally correct, then why would you have a problem educating women on ALL aspects of her choices and let her make her own educated decisions? I've never understood that. Me: Nor have I, and it reinforces my conviction that the PLM stance is morally bankrupt and indefensible. It's as if the CPC's are afraid to tell the full, objective truth, which is understandable. If they do, their targets will get away & they'll lose jesus points.
|
Joined: Jun 3, 2008
Comments: 1099
Meriden, CT
|
pbfa wrote: <quoted text> Wrong, freak. Those women rescheduled, the clinics reopened, women went elsewhere, and your psychotic partners in opinion are in jail or dead. The only thing "saved" is the conviction that your PLM is full of thugs, bombers, murders, and hypocrites. Pro-"Life" my ass. Like your other friend you missed the part where I did not approve. I just stated that for a few days anyways they could not commit murders.
|
|
Sue
Wayne, PA
|
Judged:
1
flopears123 wrote: <quoted text> I see. So if the only abortion law on the ballot is abortion for life of the mother if she chooses, what does that make you? Pro-choice Sue. See how easy that is? You support the choice Sue you just don't agree with the reasons. You're really not that much different than the rest of us. Twisting again, I see. I do not support the choice to kill the life within the womb, the only time it should be allowed is when there is no choice.
|
|
Brilliant
Newtown, CT
|
State the Obvious wrote: <quoted text> You just lost. LOL!!! WHAT an idiot! LMAOOOOOOOOO.......... It ain't a brain surgeon, and is DESPERATE for attention. How sad. That is no way to go through life.
|
|
“Grow Up & Think”
Joined: Sep 8, 2007
Comments: 5771
Chicago, IL
ISP:
Sycamore, IL
|
Sue wrote: <quoted text> I never said that people here supoport late term abortions (although I suspect that some do). However there are many abortion supporters that do, Hilary Clinton jumps to mind, and if I recall correctly there were about 30 other congressmen who also voted to keep late term abortions legal. Sue, you KNOW they voted for that ONLY because there wasn't an exclusion if the life of the mother was at stake. You yourself said today that you have no problem with abortion if the life of the mother is at stake. You're really trying to twist things now. Why?
|
Joined: Jun 3, 2008
Comments: 1099
Meriden, CT
|
pbfa wrote: <quoted text> Wrong, freak. Those women rescheduled, the clinics reopened, women went elsewhere, and your psychotic partners in opinion are in jail or dead. The only thing "saved" is the conviction that your PLM is full of thugs, bombers, murders, and hypocrites. Pro-"Life" my ass. Notice the other thing pb I also did not have to call names. God bless you.
|
|
|
|
“BJDs: Crack would be cheaper”
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Comments: 3124
Pro-choice and Proud
ISP:
North Brunswick, NJ
|
Lilrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text> NO "lives" are destroyed re: IVF. IVF creates a zygote. A cingle celled organism that is implanted in a woman, and may or may not take. Its a shame you'd deny women that WANT pregnancy. I have to admit, I simply dont understand this kind of (what I view as) narrowmindedness. Actually, for those who believe life begins at conception, IVF does destroy lives. Eggs are fertilized and developed into embryos before SOME of them are implanted. Some of those that are implanted will not implant and continue to develop. Once a successful pregnancy HAS carried to term, or sometimes even before, the embryos that weren't implanted are often destroyed. So 'lives' are created for the sole purpose of being destroyed.
|
|
justme2 not you
Florence, AL
|
Judged:
1
1
Barnabas wrote: <quoted text> Remember I said I didn't think he was right. However he did save some innocent lives. some????? how about the other some that died? how about if it was your child that fall under the some that died?? r we gonna kill now 100s to save one fetus or 2????? your somment is wrong by any mean, how can you support life if you take 100s away????
|
Joined: Jun 3, 2008
Comments: 1099
Meriden, CT
|
Sue wrote: <quoted text> You want the law to demand that no one interfere with a woman and her moral values, and in the same breath you want to take away everyone elses right to do the same. Gee Sue sounds like I will take a beating today.
|
|
“What do you mean by that?”
Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Comments: 11636
Phoenix, AZ
|
Barnabas wrote: <quoted text> Remember I said I didn't think he was right. However he did save some innocent lives. No, THEY, not "he", didn't.
|
|
“Blue Skadood And We Can Too!”
Joined: Mar 25, 2007
Comments: 8984
Knoxville, TN
|
marysaidyes2life wrote: <quoted text>You mean you might actually create a child that you don't want, How might that be possible? Aren't you gay and happilly married, or is this just a dishonest way to make us think we are own worst enemy? She said IF. Do you not know what the IF statement is? It is a conditional statement that contains a very important keyword. IF. Bigot, racist, homophobe pig.
|
|
“BJDs: Crack would be cheaper”
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Comments: 3124
Pro-choice and Proud
ISP:
North Brunswick, NJ
|
Judged:
1
1
marysaidyes2life wrote: <quoted text>so if a hit man gets paid to kill someone it's all good because that is what he got paid for? Of course, you're ignoring the fact that the contracting of a hit man is illegal.
|
Joined: Jun 3, 2008
Comments: 1099
Meriden, CT
|
z3ncat wrote: <quoted text> So all those lives of those living, breathing, sentient, feeling people are... nothing? I'm gonna tack this one right up under the 'any woman would would abort deserves to die' comment you made on the Wall of Hypocritical Anti-Choice Statements Do what you like. We still love you. Be Blessed.
|
|
Sue
Wayne, PA
|
Judged:
1
flopears123 wrote: <quoted text> Yes it is the more moral thing to do when she is going to abort either way. You and I have very different views on what is moral.
|
|
“What do you mean by that?”
Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Comments: 11636
Phoenix, AZ
|
Barnabas wrote: <quoted text> Like your other friend you missed the part where I did not approve. I just stated that for a few days anyways they could not commit murders. Since no "murders" were committed except by your partners-in-opinion, that is just another of your ignorant, hate based comments.
|
Joined: Jun 14, 2007
Comments: 10104
Md
|
C Hamilton wrote: <quoted text>Good point. I've asked this hundreds of times on this forum and NEVER recieved any answer worthy of discussion. The only thing I can guess is that they dont trust their 'moral' position to be persuasive enough for women to make the "right" decision, so they resort sometimes to only the 'education' THEY feel is necessary instead of ALL the education they COULD give. Half-truths and outright manipulations to me, is a bigger 'sin'.
|
|
“WomenDeserveBett erThanAbortion”
Joined: Sep 20, 2007
Comments: 4164
Abortion Is No Choice 4 a baby
ISP:
AOL
|
Barnabas wrote: <quoted text> Gee Sue sounds like I will take a beating today. They can't beat the truth.
|
Joined: Jun 14, 2007
Comments: 10104
Md
|
Barnabas wrote: <quoted text> Remember I said I didn't think he was right. However he did save some innocent lives. Says who?
|