LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child

Just Me wrote:

<quoted text>
Advocating, condoning, wanting it to stay legal means that you support the act.
You must be willing to admit that this act is humane enough, moral enough, wise enough to be promoting it as a choice.
Other wise, if one can't swallow the truth of the act for what it REALLY is, then something is telling you that it is not right and you shouldn't be wanting it to be a choice for another.
If I knew something was going to bring an end to anothers life,and that act was so inhumane to that suffering life, then maybe I shouldn't be supporting it as a choice.

YHVH supported it...Numbers 5.

:)

Just Me wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's talk.
First can you tell me what you think of my post?
Do you think that talking about the particulars of an issue that PC'ers are FIGHTING to keep legal is wrong?
Honest opinion please. I really cannot understand why someone who believes in something can get offended by TALKING about it.

It's nasty you judge ones morals and act like a possessed lunatic addicted to abortion videos at the same time.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, not true. At the time I commented on it, your post was there to see. There was no stunt to pull. And I copy the post with my replies anymore because it keeps all this he said, she said memory junk from happening. That's why in my replies to stuff like this, like yesterday and today, I copied the posts so all could see that I 'don't pull these stunts. I also did that to prove my points when I replied to both Nana and Chicky's 'supposed' proof, when it happened.

Big Sky wrote:

"Nope, not true. At the time I commented on it, your post was there to see."

All of my posts from that evening are "there to see". None of them were removed.

You claimed I provoked RC, thus excusing her death threat. Now, you're claiming this supposedly provocative post was removed; that's your "proof" -- a "deleted" post.

You were accusing others of doing just that -- using "deleted" posts as evidence of whatever.

You are a hypocrite.

marysaidyes2life wrote:

<quoted text>They were not deleted because they dont exist. I know pro-aborts keep a file of all the stuff you think you could use. If They were inappropriate, you and foo and the others would have responded to them, before they had a chance to be deleted which would have made a record of them, but you cant use those, because they don't exist. Now you are being dishonest and you and I and now everyone who reads this now knows it.

BS!

marysaidyes2life wrote:

<quoted text>your being dishonest again. Call it facetious if it makes you feel better, but your just full of hate for the truth.

And you're just full of hate.

Just Me wrote:

So Doctors who do abortions are really concerned about WOMEN?
It's not about helping women or girls, it is not about being for choice for women or girls....it is ALL about the money.
Here is ONE example of how much these insane and CRUEL Doctors care...
http://www.operationrescue.org/...

Speaking of cruel and insane....look what your lovely clergy have been up to.

http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...

Don't worry though, I'm sure it's an isolated incident.

Just Me wrote:

Oh look...another

Hey, I found another one too.
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/07/wi...

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice way to avoid proving the truth you really don't care about. He doesn't wish because he knows. Its convenient to lie later on....pretending you care so much for the truth you're too lazy to prove.

Prove I provoked RC's threat to "slit my throat".

Talk about avoidance. You're right, BS, it sure is "convenient" for you "to lie...pretending you care so much for the truth".

You can't evidence your claim because I never posted anything worthy of earning a death threat from anyone.

You are a hypocrite and a liar.

chooselife wrote:

<quoted text>That is your opinion and does not reflect the millions that do believe as I do.

Sheer numbers doesn't make it so. Everyone used to believe that the Earth was flat, and that the Sun revolved around it. They were just as wrong about those 'facts' as you are about the bible.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>The guy didn't even realize DD was THE DD.

Again, this is the point. In a blind taste test, he chooses Klan. Good luck cramming all this down the memory hole. Too many people remember the conversation.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
From someone who wishes to accuse and not back it up.
<<surprising?...NOT >>

I backed up my statements. You, of course, can't back up yours.

knit and pray wrote:

<quoted text>the Bible is the Word of God.

No, it's a collection of the writings of men that was put together by men in such a way as to control the population.

State the Obvious wrote:

<quoted text>
Prove I provoked RC's threat to "slit my throat".
Talk about avoidance. You're right, BS, it sure is "convenient" for you "to lie...pretending you care so much for the truth".
You can't evidence your claim because I never posted anything worthy of earning a death threat from anyone.
You are a hypocrite and a liar.

Rachel threatened to "slit your throat?" Wow! I missed that one....I think I'm happy about that.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Liars calling people liars, how funny? I was here, he made his statement and he cited his source. When it was found to be from Mr KKK himself, he apologized. It was you pc that went on the rant trying to make it into a big racist deal. The guy didn't even realize DD was THE DD.
He made very few posts, you guys were the ones who went into 'lynching mode', not MM. You have tried to enlarge it since the beginning. And we who speak the truth for him....you try to crucify with him.
And you conveniently like to point to empty posts as your proof. Its a laugh at the least.

BS wrote:

"Nope, not true. At the time I commented on it, your post was there to see."

Now BS writes:

"And you conveniently like to point to empty posts as your proof. Its a laugh at the least."

Are you really this stupid?

You are a hypocrite, a liar, a coward, and obviously too stupid to realize you're transparent.

C Hamilton wrote:

<quoted text>Rachel threatened to "slit your throat?" Wow! I missed that one....I think I'm happy about that.

Ah..yeah, the good ol' days...

State the Obvious wrote:

You are a hypocrite, a liar, a coward, and obviously too stupid to realize you're transparent.

You figured him out too!

Just Me wrote:

So Doctors who do abortions are really concerned about WOMEN?
It's not about helping women or girls, it is not about being for choice for women or girls....it is ALL about the money.
Here is ONE example of how much these insane and CRUEL Doctors care...
http://www.operationrescue.org/...

You like to paint with a big broad brush, don't you? How do you know that your very own OB/Gyn doesn't do abortions? Many do. The best doctor I ever had, who was absolutely fantastic with high risk pregnancy and extremely thorough was also on the "pro-life extremists' hit list" for performing abortions. This was the very same doctor who did everything humanly possible to save my second pregnancy and I give him the majority of the credit for getting my third pregnancy far enough along that my son was able to survive. Did he care? You're damn right he did. I can't tell you how many times I called him or met him at the hospital during off hours, or how patient and understanding he was with my daughter--or me. Maybe if you were a doctor it would all be about the money, but not everyone is like that.

Just remember, as you judge others, so will YOU be judged.

Just Me wrote:

<quoted text>
Abortion has been acknowledged as a right of privacy and decency? BY WHOM?
There is nothing decent about abortion.
A life, that is NOT the Mothers, is being destroyed.
I'd hardly call that decent behavior.
------
Abortion affects the whole society. When such an evil act has become part of our society, then we ALL suffer.

Abortion has been around ever since humans have known about the medicinal qualities of plants. In fact, it was legal in the US when the country was founded. So, for much of human history abortion has been a part of society, and we're still here.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, I didn't say G-d caused any evil at all, that is your opinion. Its yours to explain, not mine.

Let me help.

"Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told." (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT)

Yeah, that sounds pretty evil to me.

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, I didn't say G-d caused any evil at all, that is your opinion. Its yours to explain, not mine. I said the fact that G-d doesn't force goodness on us explains why evil exists...G-d gives us a choice....
And some choose evil...period. G-d doesn't choose such, the individual has and will have to answer to G-d for that kind of choice.
G-d doesn't condone it, nor approves of it, but respects the free will G-d made us with. This is my opinion......

No, this is what you wrote:

"But, my G-d doesn't force love on anyone. And that explains alot of the evil we see in this world today."

This is what it means: God does not force love, which "explains alot of evil". Cause and effect.

Maybe you didn't intend for your statement to come off that way, but that is what you wrote.

Perhaps you are having trouble comprehending your own posts?