Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Porkpie Hat wrote:

<quoted text>Qualify that the path of gravity was the path of greatest resistance elevator boy.

Here's a hint for scientifically illiterate morons such as yourself.

The towers were not a homogenous whole like a tree. They were fabricated from columns assembled in sections with connections at regular intervals. The columns were supported, or derived their load bearing capacity from the floor trusses. The floor trusses were held in place by bolted and welded connections.

Got science elevator boy?

No, you don't.

What you have is twoofy twoofs derived from pseudoscience, ignorance and ideology.

The buildings never fell symmetrically nor did they simply fall into their own foot prints.

Perhaps you should take me up on my offer to speak with a real structural engineer rather than getting all your information from twoofy websites that just keep making you look like an idiot.

Naw, you are an idiot.

Carry on elevator boy!

GucciManeImSoFuqinPaid wrote:

<quoted text>Hey PorkPie Porky whatever the name may be, I seen your music videos on youtube.
This one is my fav of you performing karaoke

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...

Hey y'all, check out Porkpie's greatest hits. Its killer

GucciManeImSoFuqinPaid wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey PorkPie Porky whatever the name may be, I seen your music videos on youtube.
This one is my fav of you performing karaoke
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...
Hey y'all, check out Porkpie's greatest hits. Its killer

RADEKT wrote:

<quoted text>But of course MORON, on CSI, they are not trying to dig out thousands of people trapped in a collapse

Insults Are Easier wrote:

<quoted text>Coming from the person who thinks the wings folded up with engines attached and followed the fuselage into the Pentagon?

What type of education are you talking about.

Insults Are Easier

... Then science.

Porkpie Hat wrote:

<quoted text>Really?
Someone should tell the designers because they say something quite different.
I'll debunked that twoofy twoof (see: disinfo) later.

RADEKT wrote:

AWESOME CONTRIBUTION to the discussion .... but what else can we expect from a TWOOF TWIT
<quoted text>

RADEKT wrote:

Dr. Pal Chana of the British Cement Association demonstrated the relative likelihood of floor collapse in a steel versus concrete framed building, using the example of the Madrid Windsor Tower fire which raged over 26 hours on 14-15 February 2005. This former landmark office block of 30 storeys featured a concrete core throughout, but with concrete columns up to the 21st floor and steel columns between the 22nd and 30th floors. Remarkably, despite the intensity and duration of the fire, the concrete floors and columns remained intact, however, the steel supported floors above the 21st floor completely collapsed, leaving the concrete core in-situ and exposed. So what does the Madrid Windsor Tower fire show? That steel columns will collapse in a fire, and that concrete is more fire-resistant, and that’s about it.
<quoted text>

Porkpie Hat wrote:

<quoted text>Hmmm...there was a plane.

It hit the Pentagon.

The walls were reinforced.

And your proof it didn't happen free fall boy?

Oh ya, your failed understanding of the physical sciences.

Judged:

1

1

1

Road Runner Cartoons Are Easier wrote:

<quoted text>
I was simply trying to understand what Say The Truths understanding of how a plane entered the pentagon through a hole smaller the dimensions of the engines.
Reinforced structures make the cartoon explanation of folding wing engines even more impossible then a normal structures impossibility of causing a cartoon folding wings with engines attached.
Funny how you always answer everything, for everyone, all the time.
What a strange Canadian control freak you are.
Insults Are Easier

timn17 wrote:

I was one of the guys that helped to orchestrate the attack. It was kept on a need to know basis and was highly compartmentalized. Many people who "knew too much" after the final solution was in place were disposed of - even people as lowly as the janitor who saw one of us carrying the thermite (in unmarked, but suspicious packages) into the building.
I will probably not be posting here again, you all know why. Don't let my death be in vain.

timn17 wrote:

I will probably not be posting here again, you all know why. Don't let my death be in Maine.

timn17 wrote:

I was one of the guys that helped to orchestrate the attack. It was kept on a need to know basis and was highly compartmentalized. Many people who "knew too much" after the final solution was in place were disposed of - even people as lowly as the janitor who saw one of us carrying the thermite (in unmarked, but suspicious packages) into the building.
I will probably not be posting here again, you all know why. Don't let my death be in vain.

Insults Are Easier wrote:

<quoted text>I was simply trying to understand what Say The Truths understanding of how a plane entered the pentagon through a hole smaller the dimensions of the engines.

Reinforced structures make the cartoon explanation of folding wing engines even more impossible then a normal structures impossibility of causing a cartoon folding wings with engines attached.

Funny how you always answer everything, for everyone, all the time.

What a strange Canadian control freak you are.

Insults Are Easier

timn17 wrote:

I was one of the guys that helped to orchestrate the attack. It was kept on a need to know basis and was highly compartmentalized. Many people who "knew too much" after the final solution was in place were disposed of - even people as lowly as the janitor who saw one of us carrying the thermite (in unmarked, but suspicious packages) into the building.

I will probably not be posting here again, you all know why. Don't let my death be in vain.

The Gloop wrote:

<quoted text>Gloop?

Annie Muk wrote:

<quoted text>
Move to Vermont - or even Québec.

Porkpie Hat wrote:

<quoted text>
Hmmm...there was a plane.
It hit the Pentagon.
The walls were reinforced.
And your proof it didn't happen free fall boy?
Oh ya, your failed understanding of the physical sciences.