Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,201 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#234074 Aug 5, 2012
To the best of our knowledge, little was known about the effects of a fire from such an aircraft, and no designs were prepared for that circumstance. Indeed, at that time, no fireproofing systems were available to control the effects of such fires - Leslie Robertson, Structural Engineer, WTC

Dr_Zorderz ha ha ha ha
Still Good For a Laugh eh!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
And on how many floors was the fire proofing knocked off the steel beams in the central core?
This might be a major point?
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
fire proofing or no
Still Good For a Laugh eh!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#234075 Aug 5, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
1) You area MORON, the calculations done for a jet hitting the WTC were done with a 707 travelling at 250 MPH, the impacts by Flight 11 & 175 were so severe they caused the buildings

**********
to sway 8 - 10 feet to the left and right
**********

2) what did Leslie Robertson say about a fuel fire after impact!?!?!?
3) Smarten Up !!!
<quoted text>
Would you please post a link to the video (or other information) that shows the buildings moving 8 - 10 feet to the left and right.(of what)

If I remember correctly they were designed to move 3 feet in a 100 mph wind.

I'm sure everyone here would like to see this evidence you claim.

Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha

Still a joke eh!
Bar as Ax

Winchester, KY

#234076 Aug 5, 2012
_Abraxas_ wrote:
<quoted text> To the person being shot out the canon no, to the wall yeas.
the only difference it would make to the wall would be the size of the splatter or whether or not rad would make it through the wall, but either way its inconsequential. I don't think even the thickness of rad's skull would be able to cause a complete collapse of the wall no matter how fast he was going. Same holds true for the planes hitting the towers. This analogy is actually quite appropriate even though in jest. But all joking aside, the faster the plane, the greater would be the lateral shear forces to break the vertical columns and thus prevent transmission of the force on the lower portions of the columns and thus resulting in less sway.
Here is another analogy since it fits your anagram name. Imagine hitting a small tree with a bar. If you hit it slowly you would cause it to bend. Now if you hit it fast enough to break it then the bar would essentially act like an ax and the tree would not bend very little as the lateral shear force would overcome the vertical shear strength of the tree.
I knew at some point your anagram name (Bar as Ax) would come in handy and now you gave me the opportunity to use it to deliver a message at the same time. Thanks.
DARK ET

Winchester, KY

#234077 Aug 5, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
you two Idiots should research "kinetic energy"
since you are the self-proclaimed expert on kinetic energy, how much kinetic energy do you suppose would be required for your thick skull to bust through a brick wall?
Bar as Ax

Winchester, KY

#234078 Aug 5, 2012
_Abraxas_ wrote:
<quoted text> Actually what you are is argumentive , biased as well as trivial and smostly full of horse pucky.
thank you, I'm happy to hear that I have such an effect on you

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#234079 Aug 5, 2012
DARK ET wrote:
<quoted text>
we already know the answer to that question...he is a paid shill
I'm sure he would have been fired a very long time ago if that were the case.

The hilarious thing about these 'debunker' obsessives is that they actually help to increase awareness of the fact that the official narrative is a total sham.

This thread is continually bumped by these numpties day after day, arguing the same old tired circular debates.

If they just went away the thread would be dead in a matter of weeks.

I put it down to mental illness.
You Glaze Us

Winchester, KY

#234080 Aug 5, 2012
Zealous_Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure he would have been fired a very long time ago if that were the case.
The hilarious thing about these 'debunker' obsessives is that they actually help to increase awareness of the fact that the official narrative is a total sham.
This thread is continually bumped by these numpties day after day, arguing the same old tired circular debates.
If they just went away the thread would be dead in a matter of weeks.
I put it down to mental illness.
you're probably right, I said this to Porkie months ago and I think he has finally come to the realization of its truth. Just wondering when these other numbskulls will finally get it. One would think that if they really were shills that their handlers would have already made them stop by now. Perhaps you are right, mental illness is probably the correct diagnosis with cognitive dissonance as the major underlying symptom.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#234081 Aug 5, 2012
Zealous_Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure he would have been fired a very long time ago if that were the case.
The hilarious thing about these 'debunker' obsessives is that they actually help to increase awareness of the fact that the official narrative is a total sham.
This thread is continually bumped by these numpties day after day, arguing the same old tired circular debates.
If they just went away the thread would be dead in a matter of weeks.
I put it down to mental illness.
They sure don't recite or quote very much information directly out of any of the "official" narratives and reports.

This must be due to the fact that these reports are embarrassingly incomplete, utterly fail to investigate many relevant facts and are written by US government appointed officials who are sworn to protect their masters.

How could the reports be factual? They must hide the truth if at all possible.

All they can come up with is "probable collapse sequence" anyway. Nothing definitive that's fer sure.

The term mentally ill is so appropriate for these bwunkers.

Jet fuel ha ha ha ha

Still funny eh!

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#234082 Aug 5, 2012

29:48
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you please post a link to the video (or other information) that shows the buildings moving 8 - 10 feet to the left and right.(of what)
If I remember correctly they were designed to move 3 feet in a 100 mph wind.
I'm sure everyone here would like to see this evidence you claim.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
Still a joke eh!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#234083 Aug 5, 2012
The camera is so shaky there is no reference to the building moving at all. The eyewitness has no reference for his testimony and not believable at all.

Dismissed for lack of any credible evidence.

Next

Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha

Good one!

Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#234084 Aug 5, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
“Salient points with regard to the structural design of The World Trade Center towers”
1. The structural analysis carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle& Jackson is the most complete and detailed of any ever made for any building structure.
3. The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC-8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
Page 131
“City In The Sky”
By James Glanz and Eric Lipton
But C'mon
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
That has to be a good one!
Obviously this so-called "analysis" was incorrect. Probably written by a marketing guy.

What happened to "2." ?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#234085 Aug 5, 2012
Zealous_Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a simple enough question, yet none of you 'debunkers' can answer it.
You guys never seem to tire of reminding the board that you think anyone who disbelieves the official narrative is some sort of 'conspiraloon'... yet here you are, day after day, engaging with the 'nutjobs'.
Why would you do that? Why are you avoiding the question?
Come on 'debunkers'... man up and answer the question.
John Lennon was a Commie.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#234086 Aug 5, 2012
THE FOOD IS HORRIBLE wrote:
<quoted text>
using words like 'obfuscate' in an attempt to sound intelligent and then following it up with a word like 'idiotic' not only shows your ineptitude but is also indicative of pretentiousness and laziness. You could have simply googled a thesaurus and maybe used a word like hebetudinous or sophmoric if you really wanted to sound intelligent but then again that would be pretentious wouldn't it? Either way I can see right through you and you can't win no matter what you do. You guys have lost, plain and simple, and you are no different than pissface flailing away with his sophmoric and ineffective insults. Your corner would be better off just throwing in the towel and just maintaining your silence. Further attempts from you are futile and make you look desperate. Save what little dignity you have left (actually none) and just walk away from your computer and may you have pleasant dreams sleeping on the canvas.
Weren't you leaving, this time for good?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#234087 Aug 5, 2012
DARK ET wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not only educated and well read but I am also adept at reading between the lines and piercing the veil of your persona right to your very soul just based on reading your syntax. I can see right through you and you are not made of much. I went to the same undergraduate university as you and received further post graduate education after that in MANY different fields.
Your expertise is limited to banking and finance, that is very obvious to me, and I sense that you are in a bit of panic right now over your financial future and the future of your profession, and we both know you have every reason to be in a panic.
If you're so well educated, why do you have a job changing bedpans in W. Bummfuk, KY?

Must be all liberal arts, and you skipped out on hard sciences and math.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#234088 Aug 5, 2012
DARK ET wrote:
<quoted text>
1) we have already discussed the structural redundancy of the towers and its ability to withstand isolated structural failure which makes the effects of the speed of the planes on impact almost irrelevant. The buildings were built to withstand hurricane force winds so the force of the plane impact was probably substantially less than that. This was already accounted for in the redundant structural design of the building so your point is moot.
2) Fuel and office furniture fire and even the resulting 'collapse' cannot turn steel and concrete and the contents of the building to mostly dust and nanoparticles.
Bill, why did you run away from NYC?

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#234089 Aug 5, 2012
YOU ARE AN IDIOT .... the "eyewitness" is Brain Clarke ONE of only four people who survived from above the impact zone, and he clearly talks about the building moving
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The camera is so shaky there is no reference to the building moving at all. The eyewitness has no reference for his testimony and not believable at all.
Dismissed for lack of any credible evidence.
Next
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
Good one!
Yet has Truth

Winchester, KY

#234090 Aug 5, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Weren't you leaving, this time for good?
only when you leave for good. I just love to smack you shills down every time you show up, I simply can't resist.
Yet has Truth

Winchester, KY

#234091 Aug 5, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're so well educated, why do you have a job changing bedpans in W. Bummfuk, KY?
Must be all liberal arts, and you skipped out on hard sciences and math.
what do you do for a living?
Yet has Truth

Winchester, KY

#234092 Aug 5, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill, why did you run away from NYC?
after 9/11 I knew it wasn't safe to remain anywhere near there, especially with the radiation levels at Ground Zero.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#234093 Aug 5, 2012
Zealous_Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Radekt, what are you even debating here?
The planes were travelling at 250mph or 500mph? Which, quite clearly is totally inconsequential.
.
Obviously you never passed Physics 101.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min Lumajuice 810,425
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 6 min kent 574,363
Last Word + 2 (Jul '14) 6 min andet1987 1,050
3 Word Game (Feb '12) 8 min andet1987 4,640
If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 9 min seenthisside 973
4 word game (use same Letter) (Mar '13) 11 min andet1987 1,372
This ~ or ~ That? (game) (Dec '12) 20 min andet1987 1,643
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr truth 608,271
Dubai massage Body To Body full service 0559... (Mar '14) 3 hr perfect massage r... 206
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 13 hr Jon 19
More from around the web