Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

53,624 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Yet has Truth

Winchester, KY

#233977 Aug 4, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Photos abound. Objects colliding at 500MPH turn into tiny little bits, then ground down by thousands of ton of materials falling 1000ft turn them into tinier bits.
ok so when the aluminum fuselage of the 757 hit the Pentagon facade did it turn into tiny bits? Give me a simple yes or no answer and we will proceed to the next question based on that answer.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#233978 Aug 4, 2012
DARK ET wrote:
<quoted text>
how is that possible when we clearly saw the planes completely 'melt' into the towers like a hot knife through butter? Did the building 'spit out' the engine as it collapsed? Is that kind of like STT's theory on the engines popping through the Pentagon windows?
That's right dopey, they should have bounced off like in a cartoon, which is how you learned everything you know about physics.
Yet has Truth

Winchester, KY

#233979 Aug 4, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right dopey, they should have bounced off like in a cartoon, which is how you learned everything you know about physics.
sure, the cartoon version of the building spitting out the engine and the passport would be quite amusing.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#233980 Aug 4, 2012
This Just In

After "melting" into the towers, the titanium engines from a crashing Boeing 767 then turn into tiny bits. The rest of the aircraft turns into dust along with most of the solid mass of the WTC towers!

Why it's just basic physics, like on The Big Bang TV show!

That's a good one!

But

Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha

Is a better one !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#233981 Aug 4, 2012
Yet has Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
ok so when the aluminum fuselage of the 757 hit the Pentagon facade did it turn into tiny bits? Give me a simple yes or no answer and we will proceed to the next question based on that answer.
No.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#233983 Aug 4, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
Right, because 110, ACRE sized floors of sheet rock wouldn't produce any dust
<quoted text>
Also the concrete floors were thin lightweight and brittle , if you have ever broken up concrete you would know this creates massive dust as well.

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#233984 Aug 4, 2012
the engine MORON was spit out in the impact, there are videos very clearly showing debris shooting out the other side of the building
DARK ET wrote:
<quoted text>
how is that possible when we clearly saw the planes completely 'melt' into the towers like a hot knife through butter? Did the building 'spit out' the engine as it collapsed? Is that kind of like STT's theory on the engines popping through the Pentagon windows?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#233985 Aug 4, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
the engine MORON was spit out in the impact, there are videos very clearly showing debris shooting out the other side of the building
<quoted text>
All you know about 9/11 came from videos. In fact the "science" of what happened on 9/11 all came from videos.

Videos are easily fabricated. Watch "Wag The Dog" and you will learn something about the "science" of videos. Then watch the planes "melting" into the steel columns of the outer wall, and debris shooting out the other side again.

But then maybe you saw it on TV. Very convincing if you are an imbecile.

Now Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha

That's a good one too!

cheer up courteously

Bangor, ME

#233986 Aug 4, 2012
Annie Muk wrote:
<quoted text>
I can answer that question, even if he is too timid to step up. The answer is simple (in itself) but complex in its psycological pre-conditioning. I suspect you already know this but that you'd like to see if this fellow has any earnestness to "soul-search" it out for himself:
It is the chain of INFERIORITY COMPLEX - thus TAKING THINGS PERSONALLY - plus a LACK OF CHARACTER by national upbringing, and so linking the 4 in a chain that manifests itself in COMPULSORY NATIONALISM/PATRIOTISM. The condition is common among children of parents who are alcholics or drug abusers.
In other words he knows neither know who he is, nor where he is. He has no control of his life or his future. Without sufficient knowledge he is compelled to believe that his existance is secure in the national propaganda that has been fed to him since birth. It is not unlke "Bible Bashers" who believe in the Bible, as it is interpreted to them by others, because "not to believe" (and yet prosper) requires much more knowledge and wisdom than they can muster.
To sum it up, these people (here on Topix) are too afraid "not to believe" in the official line because they are completely incapable of taking responsibilty for their own lives. Therefore, to critisize the National line is to deny these people their existance - as they see it. They are here then, frantically attempting to block the force and knowledge that I (and presumabley you as well) represent.
The force???...LOL
DARK ET

Winchester, KY

#233987 Aug 4, 2012
RADEKT wrote:
the engine MORON was spit out in the impact, there are videos very clearly showing debris shooting out the other side of the building
<quoted text>
Is the moron a part of the engine???

There are many problems and inconsistencies with your statement:

WTC 1 (north tower) was hit on its north facade. Murray street is 3 blocks north of that which means that the engine would have had to 'bounce' off the building (as per STT) and travel three blocks BACKWARDS to end up on Murray street.

WTC 2 (south tower) was hit on its south facade and if you look on an overhead map you will see that this is about 7 blocks north of the impact zone. If you look at the trajectory of the airplane parts 'shooting' out the other side of WTC 2 it clearly does not appear to have been able to travel a full 7 blocks while evading the buildings in its path to land on Murray St.

You don't need to have a knowledge of physics to understand that an engine ending up on Murray St. is impossible. Common sense and a knowledge of basic geometry is all you need and I think even a MORON like you (from Snodfart University???) should be able to grasp these concepts.
So which engine ended up on Murray St? The one that 'bounced' backwards off building 1 or the one that shot through building 2 and flew 7 blocks in the air weaving its way through the other buildings?
Dr Order ZZ

Winchester, KY

#233989 Aug 4, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
All you know about 9/11 came from videos. In fact the "science" of what happened on 9/11 all came from videos.
Videos are easily fabricated. Watch "Wag The Dog" and you will learn something about the "science" of videos. Then watch the planes "melting" into the steel columns of the outer wall, and debris shooting out the other side again.
But then maybe you saw it on TV. Very convincing if you are an imbecile.
Now Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
That's a good one too!
the bwunkers seem to be in disagreement over physical principals. On the one hand you have ratdick who believes the plane can melt into a steel facade and still have enough momentum to go through the steel inner columns AND penetrate the outer facade on the other side.
On the flip side you have STT who believes that the plane disintegrated into itty bitty pieces and turned to dust upon impact. They seem to be a bit confused on this matter.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#233990 Aug 4, 2012
"Flight of the Bumble Planes"

Interesting theory of how a bunch of dumb and dumber college kids, some of whom flunked out of flying school and could not solo a Cessna,- FOOLED the largest, most modern, technologically superior defensive and offensive military force in the world, namely NORAD, FAA, Washington DC Air National Guard, New York Air National Guard, Northeast Air Defense Sector and the US Air Force long enough to hijack 4 commercial airliners, fly them hundreds of miles around the US country side and then fly them into buildings in New York City and Washington DC?

Flying time for the four hijacked airliners indicates a total of one hour and twenty-five minutes elapsed between the time that Boston Air Traffic Control lost contact with the first allegedly hijacked Flight 11 and the Pentagon was allegedly attacked by flight 77.

Is this is a monumentally inexplicable set of well co-ordinated moves? Or all coincidences? Take a new look. ca 2007

excerpt:
"The first thing to which I'd like to draw your attention is the remarkable correspondence of the times of key events. With the exception only of Flight 11's take off and Flight 93's crash, all key events coincide with one another in some way. The colour coding of times in the timetable brings this out. Flight 11 for instance first deviates from its route a minute or two after Flight 175 takes off, and its transponder is switched off at the same time that Flight 77 takes off. Flight 175 first deviates from its route just as Flight 93 takes off and its transponder goes off at the same time that Flight 11 hits WTC1, which is also the time that Flight 77 first goes off course. It carries on like that right to the end. It's uncanny. It's either an amazing sequence of coincidences or it means that 9-11 was an incredibly well co-ordinated operation with someone in full control of and in communication with the four planes from the ground. Those crafty al-Qaeda scallywags."

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/spencer02.htm

Take your pick of a bunch of Bumble Plane sites.

https://startpage.com/do/metasearch.pl...

Bwunkers needn't bother trying to refute, dismiss out of hand, call names or spew ridicule.

Because It's So Easy eh!

Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha

Is a funny one!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#233991 Aug 4, 2012
DARK ET wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the moron a part of the engine???
Yeah the "moron" is the part that holds the engine down and believes in it!

Because

Insults Are Easier

But

Jet Fuel is Quicker

And Funny Too!
Dr Order ZZ

Winchester, KY

#233992 Aug 4, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
"Flight of the Bumble Planes"
Interesting theory of how a bunch of dumb and dumber college kids, some of whom flunked out of flying school and could not solo a Cessna,- FOOLED the largest, most modern, technologically superior defensive and offensive military force in the world, namely NORAD, FAA, Washington DC Air National Guard, New York Air National Guard, Northeast Air Defense Sector and the US Air Force long enough to hijack 4 commercial airliners, fly them hundreds of miles around the US country side and then fly them into buildings in New York City and Washington DC?
Flying time for the four hijacked airliners indicates a total of one hour and twenty-five minutes elapsed between the time that Boston Air Traffic Control lost contact with the first allegedly hijacked Flight 11 and the Pentagon was allegedly attacked by flight 77.
Is this is a monumentally inexplicable set of well co-ordinated moves? Or all coincidences? Take a new look. ca 2007
excerpt:
"The first thing to which I'd like to draw your attention is the remarkable correspondence of the times of key events. With the exception only of Flight 11's take off and Flight 93's crash, all key events coincide with one another in some way. The colour coding of times in the timetable brings this out. Flight 11 for instance first deviates from its route a minute or two after Flight 175 takes off, and its transponder is switched off at the same time that Flight 77 takes off. Flight 175 first deviates from its route just as Flight 93 takes off and its transponder goes off at the same time that Flight 11 hits WTC1, which is also the time that Flight 77 first goes off course. It carries on like that right to the end. It's uncanny. It's either an amazing sequence of coincidences or it means that 9-11 was an incredibly well co-ordinated operation with someone in full control of and in communication with the four planes from the ground. Those crafty al-Qaeda scallywags."
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/spencer02.htm
Take your pick of a bunch of Bumble Plane sites.
https://startpage.com/do/metasearch.pl...
Bwunkers needn't bother trying to refute, dismiss out of hand, call names or spew ridicule.
Because It's So Easy eh!
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha
Is a funny one!
The wing span of a 757 is about 165 ft. The facade of the towers was about 210 ft. The planes hit almost dead center. That means the pilots would have had to adjust the flight path of the plane at precisely the right heading at a great distance before impact based simply on their eyesight because traveling at about 450mph there would be no time to make fine adjustments upon approach.
The chances of hitting it with that kind of precision would be like trying to put a basketball through a hoop across the length of a football field.
Dr Order ZZ

Winchester, KY

#233993 Aug 4, 2012
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah the "moron" is the part that holds the engine down and believes in it!
Because
Insults Are Easier
But
Jet Fuel is Quicker
And Funny Too!
Here is an interesting piece on the physics behind the preposterous claim of the indestructible passport that you might find amusing.
http://www.takeourworldback.com/911/911passpo...
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#233994 Aug 4, 2012
cheer up courteously wrote:
<quoted text>The force???...LOL
No, da SCHWARTZ!
Yet has Truth

Winchester, KY

#233995 Aug 4, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Who claims "complete disintegration"? That's right, TWOOFERS.
let's forget about the disintegration of the plane for now (since your silence on the matter speaks volumes) and talk about the indestructible passport and how it ended up on Vesey St.
Here are some questions to address. Where was that passport initially? In the hijackers pocket? In his carry on luggage? In the seat pocket in front? Wherever it was, how did it manage to break itself free and fly magically through the air to end up essentially unscathed on the street? Go ahead and amuse us with your explanation, I'm looking forward to it, this should be a really good 'un. To help you with your explanation maybe you should read through this first so you know where I am coming from.
http://www.takeourworldback.com/911/911passpo...
Annie Muk

Sweden

#233996 Aug 4, 2012
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you first.
Suit yourself.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#233997 Aug 4, 2012
Dr Order ZZ wrote:
<quoted text>
the bwunkers seem to be in disagreement over physical principals. On the one hand you have ratdick who believes the plane can melt into a steel facade and still have enough momentum to go through the steel inner columns AND penetrate the outer facade on the other side.
On the flip side you have STT who believes that the plane disintegrated into itty bitty pieces and turned to dust upon impact. They seem to be a bit confused on this matter.
The confusion is all yours. Just because you don't have the background and the intelligence to understand it doesn't mean it's not real.

Don't you have dishes to wash, or is it your day off?
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#233998 Aug 4, 2012
Dr Order ZZ wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is an interesting piece on the physics behind the preposterous claim of the indestructible passport that you might find amusing.
http://www.takeourworldback.com/911/911passpo...
takeourworldback = antisemites

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min ChristineM 743,296
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 14 min Johnny 3,347
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 48 min ChristineM 228,516
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 48 min Clearwater 174,180
Lido Theater, Dallas (Mar '12) 1 hr Stiff N clean 260
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Epiphany2 601,380
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr KayMarie 544,818

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE