Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Jailhouse biatch in Denver wrote:

<quoted text>GOOGLE IT!

:)

Translation: the kiddy diddler got caught lying...again but is too much of a kkkoward to man up and admit it.

Am I surprised?

Of course not.

Path wrote:

<quoted text>One can't.

Thats as far as I got Can-of-Birfers.

Say the Poop wrote:

<quoted text>
He said, attempting to rationalize his hatred of jooos...

I hate some "Joooos", I hate some Whites, I hate some Blacks, and I hate some Asians. But not because of who they are - but because of what have done.

I also like some "Joooos", I like some Whites, I like some Blacks, and I like some Asians. But not because of who they are - but because of what have done.

I know that's pretty deep for a first grader mind like yours, but take a little time to think about it - and it will eventually make sense - even to a Poopster like you.

Dr_Zorderz wrote:

<quoted text>"can't help but feel"

"something toxic"

"sense of hatred

C'mon, everything about this pig reeks of toxic hate filled fallacious rhetoric. He was bottle fed and never got no tit. This is his way of getting back at the world for growing up a complete nerd and being bullied and beat up every day in kindergarten right on through whatever level he managed to complete.

His wife was in New York on 9/11 and he couldn't contact her for a few hours. Boo hoo.

Ever since then he hides behind his computer and ridicules and calls everyone names who merely question the official story of 9/11.

He is a stinkin narcissistic ideologue, a liar and a pig.

And a chickenshit that is scared to debate a childish twoof twit to boot.

Just because he has a nice looking strat and a lot of spare guitar strings don't make him a musician. It's just for show.

How ironic!

Debunkers Declamation wrote:

<quoted text>Deliver derogatory diatribes, dutifully defend dishonesty, deliberately deceive

Have you met zorders or rtq yet?

Why is it twoofers have such a lack of self awareness?

And why are they always whining?

Porkpie the RACIST PIG wrote:

<quoted text>
Translation: the kiddy diddler got caught lying...again but is too much of a kkkoward to man up and admit it.
Am I surprised?
Of course not.

I'm surpised that you routinely try to insult me, then expect me to do your research for you. That has to be the product of some sort of idiots mindset.

Meanwhile, GOOGLE IT, bitch!

:)

Debunkers Declamation wrote:

<quoted text>
Deliver derogatory diatribes, dutifully defend dishonesty, deliberately deceive

Ditto and Bravo!

And have you noticed that the dumbest ones in the bunch always have the most to say.

:)

Marvin in Denver wrote:

<quoted text>I'm surpised that you routinely try to insult me, then expect me to do your research for you. That has to be the product of some sort of idiots mindset.

Meanwhile, GOOGLE IT, bitch!

:)

Like I said, you got caught lying...again and now can't behave like an adult and either admit your error or support your claim.

Jeez kiddy diddler, it's like déjà vu!

With a wave of his snout pig pie will say hogwash.

Its all lies. My resident idiot Dr. Bazant will tell you what happened.

and then some name calling and ridicule

yawn

Porkpie Hat wrote:

<quoted text>
How ironic!

Not very ironic at all!

Weak like your erections, ED boy

Zealous_Guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that all you've got RADEKT? I haven't mentioned any of those things. Weak man, very weak.

you're too stupid to know what Irony is

Dr_Zorderz wrote:

<quoted text>
Not very ironic at all!

Timestin wrote:

you're too stupid to know what Irony is
<quoted text>

Bwunkers musta all gone to the club for pudding and a nap.

Socko time

So lets re-cap what team twoof brought ot the table today:

a) A ficticious stand down order...again.

b) A lie about stating there was a stand down order.

c) A big 'ol bucket of irony.

d) Some whining about insults in posts filled with insults...hence some of the irony.

e) A proselytizing Duck.

wow

go
twoof
go

Dr_Zorderz wrote:

<quoted text>
Not very ironic at all!

Other than the ironic parts, no.

Timestin wrote:

Weak like your erections, ED boy
<quoted text>

This, ladies and gentlemen is the best defenders of the official cover-up can do.

I rest my case.

Dr_Zorderz wrote:

<quoted text>
Bwunkers musta all gone to the club for pudding and a nap.
Socko time

The two biggest jerks from that bunch are probably out getting bikini waxes and pounding each others fudge.

:)

your turn piggy

piggy went out for puddin and a nap

Here is a tidbit to keep you company while we wait for pig to come back if he dares.

In this article, which is an appendix to Prof. Griffin's second book, he lists over 100 lies included in the official 9/11 Commission report. Links to other pages on Serendipity have been added, for those who may not yet be fully informed (and who wish to be, since there are some who don't want to know anything about this, probably because they can't handle knowing the truth — it is too threatening to their self-serving view of the world).

Those who would conceal the truth have tried (with some success) to condition the public into associating any questioning of the official version of events with the label "conspiracy theory" (and implicitly, "lunatic conspiracy theory"). A moment's consideration will reveal that this is quite a stupid claim, since to question, or to cast doubt upon, some claim or story is not in itself to put forward any other claim or story, and still less any "theory". One may (as many do) disbelieve the U.S. government's story about what happened on 9/11 without being obliged to provide any explanation at all as to what happened on that day. The first question which should be asked is whether the official story is plausible, and just a little research will show that not only is it implausible, it cannot be true. Realizing this is the first step toward gaining some insight into the events of 9/11. Many, however, are not even willing to make that first step, preferring to lie to themselves, with no thought for the consequences.

David Ray Griffin, Ph.D.
In discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better title might have been "a 571-page lie." (Actually, I was saying "a 567-page lie," because I was forgetting to count the four pages of the Preface.)

In making this statement, one of my points has been that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie: that the official story about 9/11 is true.

Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie, The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my critique's subtitle, "Omissions and Distortions." It might be thought, to be sure, that of the two types of problems signaled by those two terms, only those designated "distortions" can be considered lies.

It is better, however, to understand the two terms as referring to two types of lies: implicit and explicit. We have an explicit lie when the Report claims that the core of each of the Twin Towers consisted of a hollow steel shaft or when it claims that Vice President Cheney did not give the shoot-down order until after 10:10 that morning.

But we have an implicit lie when the Commission, in its discussion of the 19 alleged suicide hijackers, omits the fact that at least six of them have credibly been reported to be still alive, or when it fails to mention the fact that Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. Such omissions are implicit lies partly because they show that the Commission did not honor its stated intention "to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11."

They are also lies insofar as the Commission could avoid telling an explicit lie about the issue in question only by not mentioning it, which, I believe, was the case in at least most instances.

Given these two types of lies, it might be wondered how many lies are contained in The 9/11 Commission Report. I do not know. But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article.

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page-lie.ht...

It's hard not to be a menace to society, when half the population is happy on their knees.