15 Iraq Policemen Kidnapped, Then Killed

No doubt this was done to influence the US election. Regardless of what Micheal Moore and Cindy Sheehan say, these murderers are not "freedom fighters".

Indeed.

Hearts and minds one body at a time.

Yeah, I wouldn't call 'em freedom fighters either. I'd call them the same thing the U.S. military calls them: insurgents. Insurgents fighting a civil war. With the U.S. becoming increasingly irrelevant, even though the U.S. set the stage for the whole thing, with the outcome predicted beforehand by those who knew, most notable Mubarak of Egypt.

Lance Winslow wrote:

Yeah, I wouldn't call 'em freedom fighters either. I'd call them the same thing the U.S. military calls them: insurgents. Insurgents fighting a civil war. With the U.S. becoming increasingly irrelevant, even though the U.S. set the stage for the whole thing, with the outcome predicted beforehand by those who knew, most notable Mubarak of Egypt.

I would appreciate it if you would not use my name to post fraudulent posts. Thank you very much.

Lance Winslow (actual)

Algernon Sidney wrote:

No doubt this was done to influence the US election. Regardless of what Micheal Moore and Cindy Sheehan say, these murderers are not "freedom fighters".

Yeah I'm sure they just love us when we kick in their doors and terrorize their families: "Hey listen ya'll, we're bringin' ya freedom here, so git in the corner while we cover you ragheads wit' hoods...hey corporal shoot that kid, it looks like he's got a gun in his pants"

By the way

TERRORISTS=INSURGENTS=RESISTAN CE

you're about as smart as a teaspoon of melted butter. Can't you see that it was opposite day when these Iraqi officers were killed? Clearly these gunmen merely wanted to bring life into the world, until their calenders revealed the accursed opposite day was nigh. So, in true holiday spirit they went out and shot up a couple people. Fine by me. Would you get mad at someone for giving presents on Christmas? I think not. Just because Iraqis have fierce bloodthirsty holidays doesn't make them bad. We should be nice to them and give them sanctions and adopt them some African babies.

The United States of America is the greatest nation in the History of mankind, so if we are going to discuss these things, then perhaps we might use that at the baseline and starting point to be completely fair and responsible.

Lance Winslow wrote:

The United States of America is the greatest nation in the History of mankind, so if we are going to discuss these things, then perhaps we might use that at the baseline and starting point to be completely fair and responsible.

As usual Lance your a Jones kind of guy. If were not the ones getting blown away all is just duckie. You quack about having been in every city of 10,000 in the USA, I wonder if you have seen up close what this gift were bringing to the world is really like? I doubt it but what the hell your happy with your illusions so enjoy.

Spuds wrote:

<quoted text>As usual Lance your a Jones kind of guy. If were not the ones getting blown away all is just duckie. You quack about having been in every city of 10,000 in the USA, I wonder if you have seen up close what this gift were bringing to the world is really like? I doubt it but what the hell your happy with your illusions so enjoy.

Can you explain this post. I think you are making a derogatory comment in a nice way? That is fine, I can handle constructive criticism. So, go ahead and re-post.

Algernon Sidney wrote:

No doubt this was done to influence the US election. Regardless of what Micheal Moore and Cindy Sheehan say, these murderers are not "freedom fighters".

I smell FOX...since more than three years iraqi policemen are killed by insurgents or terrorists.
But you are right they're definitely no freedom fighters.

This tactic of killing anybody who supports the puppet regime has been going on for a long time. Have they increased the level of killings to get the attention of the American electorate? To 'influence' us to get the hell out and let them solve this among themselves?

Here's my answer: I hope so.

It becomes clear that PM al Maliki Iraqi government let down US troops, by cooperating with the Iranian Ahmadinajad sponsored Mehdi Army Shiite terrorists of a Sadr. As Shiite Muslim, al Maliki support the sectarian war against the Sunnis, and he uses the Shiite terrorists that are supported by Iran with IEDs, mortars and missiles against the Iraqi government soldiers, US troops and innocent Sunni men, women and children. Even for Iraqi PM who is a Shiite Muslim, religious comes before the interests of the country. In his visit to Iran about three months ago, al Maliki requested the 'support' of the Iranian president Ahmadinajad in fighting the Sunnis and Al Qaida that cross the border from saudi Arabia and Syria to Iraq. Now Iraq was taken over in some regions with the Mehdi Army which is nothing less than Iranian proxy as an independent militia inside sovereign Iraq which is similar to the Hezbollah Islamic terrorists in sovereign Lebanon which are independent militia there while they are also proxy of same Ahmadinajad. US Troops therefore should not patrol the streets of Iraqi cities where they are target of the Mehdi Army snipers, and al Qaida Islamic terrorists. US troops should support the ‘federal’ Iraqi government rule in Iraq that is separated to independent provinces according to its Islamic sects. US troops should be away from sectarian war and should start to come back in 2007. The enemy is clearly Iranian regime of Ahmadinajad that must be dealt with before any progress can be made in Iraq.

LetsGetReal wrote:

To 'influence' us to get the hell out and let them solve this among themselves?
Here's my answer: I hope so.

You hope that gangs of brutal lawless murderers are given equal footing against a majority of honest, innocent citizens who want to live in peace. That is the height of barbarity.

Donnie wrote:

<quoted text>You hope that gangs of brutal lawless murderers are given equal footing against a majority of honest, innocent citizens who want to live in peace. That is the height of barbarity.

They will only solve this on their own. Barbarity is what they are used to. This is why Saddam had to use such strong arm tactics to keep these factions under control. Why is it that no one really gets this? The Great and Powerful all knowing dimwit in the White house had to go and open Pandora's box creating this huge mess.

My belief is that fewer Iraqi civilians will die once the U.S. leaves.

The U.S. presence in Iraq if the main cause of the violence. Once we leave, they will have to talk to each other.

not a republican anymore wrote:

<quoted text>They will only solve this on their own. Barbarity is what they are used to. This is why Saddam had to use such strong arm tactics to keep these factions under control. Why is it that no one really gets this? The Great and Powerful all knowing dimwit in the White house had to go and open Pandora's box creating this huge mess.

It is very typical for the left wing liberals to see a problem and to ‘cut and run’ away, not looking backwards...But If US troops will escape from Iraq, the Iranian evil regime will take over Iraq as fast as one can say ‘a-Sadr Mehdi Army’ which is the Ahmadinajad proxy army in Iraq. Iran will take over the oil fields in Iraq, and will threaten the oil-rich countries of the Persian Golf with nuclear WMDs from North Korea, to control 40% of the oil in the world. Sooner than later Iran will attack Israel with WMDs, causing the Middle East to burst in flames... Obviously, the left wing liberals should be kept far away from political power, especially Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and John Murtha who are clueless about the Middle East...

Interesting theories. Funny that I've never heard another soul make those claims. Interesting that you think the rest of the Middle East would permit such a thing.

Jones wrote:

<quoted text>
It is very typical for the left wing liberals to see a problem and to ‘cut and run’ away, not looking backwards...But If US troops will escape from Iraq, the Iranian evil regime will take over Iraq as fast as one can say ‘a-Sadr Mehdi Army’ which is the Ahmadinajad proxy army in Iraq. Iran will take over the oil fields in Iraq, and will threaten the oil-rich countries of the Persian Golf with nuclear WMDs from North Korea, to control 40% of the oil in the world. Sooner than later Iran will attack Israel with WMDs, causing the Middle East to burst in flames... Obviously, the left wing liberals should be kept far away from political power, especially Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and John Murtha who are clueless about the Middle East...

You man like it is typical for Republicans to "cut and paste" answers. We should have never been there to begin with. We are only making things worse at this time. We need to get the heck out of Iraq and let the citizens of that country solve THEIR problems. You may have missed the part about 75% of them wanting us to go but I did not. It is time to give it up. We made a mess and We have no way of cleaning it up as the administration does not have any concept of what the Iraqi people believe, or want.

Lance Winslow wrote:

The United States of America is the greatest nation in the History of mankind, so if we are going to discuss these things, then perhaps we might use that at the baseline and starting point to be completely fair and responsible.

sorry i am late
yes us i strong nation now adays
may be the who used the most brutal force agianst enemy
i think by now u should memorize the numbers:
1.5 million iraqi child killed by this force
2.5% of iraqi population killed during war

i want talk too much about the crime u commit outside us soil
no let us talk
the crime rate :
The United States Crime Index Rates Per 100,000 Inhabitants went from 1,887.2 in 1960 to 5,897.8 in 1991. By 1991 the crime rate was 313% the 1960 crime rate. In 1996 your risk of being a victim of a crime in the United States was 5.079%, and of a violent crime 0.634%.
In 1960 these rates were 1.89% of being a victim of a crime and 0.161% of becoming victim of a violent crime.
Our Index of Crime Statistics cover the period from 1960 to 2000. They cover the total reported crime, and compare population to the total crime reported by Index. Categories include Property, Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery, Aggravated assault, Burglary, Larceny-theft, and Vehicle theft
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/

more on crime rate
criminal victimizations included an estimated 18 million property crimes (burglaries, motor vehicle thefts and household thefts); 5.2 million violent crimes (rapes or sexual assaults, robberies, aggravated assaults and simple assaults); and 227,000 personal thefts (picked pockets and snatched purses).
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/cv05pr...

rape:
http://www.rainn.org/statistics/index.html...
Every two and a half minutes, somewhere in America, someone is sexually assaulted.
One in six American women are victims of sexual assault, and one in 33 men.
In 2004-2005, there were an average annual 200,780 victims of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault.
About 44% of rape victims are under age 18, and 80% are under age 30.

violence against women:
http://www.now.org/issues/violence/stats.html
Every year 1.2 million women are forcibly raped by their current or former male partners, some more than once.
this is us freedom 1.2 million u raelly big big in being criminals

children :
http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/jjbul2001_5_1...
This Bulletin describes NIBRS and its role in depicting police experience with child abuse and reports key findings derived from NIBRS data. Analysis of these data indicates that parents and other caretakers commit 49 percent of the kidnapings and 27 percent of the sexual assaults of juveniles. These and other caretaker offenses are reviewed in these pages.

the number make me sick sorry