Prove there's a god.

Buck Crick wrote:

<quoted text>
Dead people do revive.
They used to stay dead, but medical science allows that they do not stay dead now - in many cases.
If the test for being dead is not reviving, that is a ridiculous test.
But yeah. Many people are walking around who were dead once.

LOL!.. quite a ridiculous test...

I think it's accepted that the body takes sometime to die fully, so can be revived during that period..

Buck Crick wrote:

<quoted text>
Elvira Gulch ("Wizard of Oz") was a witch, just like you.
"I'll get you, my little pretty. And your little dog, too!"
:0)

Elvira Gulch isn't a real person; Hitler was. History proves he was a christian. Deal with it.

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand it and believe it , when you are vulnerable you don't want your friends or loved ones to see you. At least I am that way.
Aramis was a musketeer, but like him in that respect am I.

:-)
When death is a gradual process, maybe then the moment of death can be somewhat controlled.. like a letting go..
Either within the safely felt presence of loved ones, or without an audience.. of course I guess for many people there is no choice..

Catcher1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Al will be a good host, I assure you.
He won't be reciting Lord Tennyson, or Keats, or Shelley, but WTF.
Right, Al?

Rigjt!

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey!! There's nothing wrong with reasonable faith!
I have reasonable faith that my car will start when I'm at Costco in the pouring rain. I have reasonable faith that tomorrow is a new day. I have reasonable faith that if I eat too many fig newtons, I'm gonna spend the rest of the day on the can.
I have reasonable faith that Buck will come up with another stupid "Intelligent Design doesn't require a designer" argument.

Buck Crick wrote:

<quoted text>
You made that up.

LIAR!!!

YOU are the one who kept refuting me every time I explalined to you that DESIGN DEMANDS A DESIGNER.

Get it into your fucking thick skull: DESIGN DEMANDS A DESIGNER.

Your ID bullshit is just another name for "god dunnit," and you fucking well know it.

Catcher1 wrote:

Oh, forgot to say, yes, lots of trashy women there.
And if we can't find them, we'll head on over to Norco.
Talk about trashy.

Yup! Horse faced women that can eat corn thru a picket fence......

Buck Crick wrote:

<quoted text>
Not much talent for nuance on this thread.

Not much talent for thinking from you.

Double Fine wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes! Yes! Yes!
http://www.supersport.com/football/uefa-champ...
But what a game!!!
Barca was 2-0 up, with Chelsea reduced to ten men (after a signature Barca dive, fake and sell).
Chelsea pulled one back on the half time whistle, getting the score to 2-1, but leaving Chelsea in the better position, on away goals.
Second half, Barca's lack of physicality did them in and they could not break down Chelsea'a resolute defence. Then, on 92 minutes, Torres broke, and with all Barca's players pushed forward, he set the tie beyond doubt.
2-2 on the night;
3-2 on aggregate.
Chelsea through to face Madrid/Munchen
Barca flushed down the pooper.

This is very good..!
Great result..to come back from 2-0 down..
Chelsea has miraculously transformed..!
so glad Torres scored, he's had a hard time of it, I reckon.
(well, relative to football reality).

Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
NAMBLA is not representative of homosexuals
Pedopilia is not representative of homosexuality
Homosexuality is not defined as men abusing boys, just as heterosexuality is not defined as men abusing girls.
Homosexuality is a behaviour and a lifestyle, pedophilia is a mental disorder, a disease.
Homosexuals, men and women, can fulfill meaningful, functioning roles in society.
Pedophiles can make it appear that they fit it, as already mentioned, most NAMBLA members are heterosexual men with wives and kids. However, their disease make them believe that their affection and lust towards young children may be reciprocated. Thus, while seeming 'normal', they try to prey on children. They should be at the very least, removed from society. I have doubts over their ability to be rehabilitated, however many differ from my POV here.
Let's go past the pedophilia issue.
Rape is violence, first and foremost. Yes, it is a sexual deed, but does not identify one's sexuality, more likely it identifies what is available to the offender. Just because there are hetero/homosexual components to it, DOES NOT MEAN WE CAN FIT THE RAPIST INTO THOSE CATEGORIES.
Same with NAMBLA. Yes, the acts are male on male, but remember what I said - to a rapist/pedophile, the key is *access*. Some of these twisted sickos only abuse boys, because that is all they have access to.
Can we be done with is issue now?

Buck Crick wrote:

<quoted text>
NO, because you are not going to state bull shit and then be done.

That's *your* prerogative, isn't it? That and redefining the English language to suit your faulty arguments, and constantly moving the goalposts around and declaring yourself winner.

Buck Crick, master of pigeon chess.

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
You're so superficial and bigoted...

lightbeamrider wrote:

<quoted text> Opinions vary.

Not in this case.

Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
"SHRIEK!"

YELLODOG wrote:

<quoted text>
You should look into getting something done about that complusive shrieking.....

You should look into getting something done about your pathological lying.

Big_Poppa_ wrote:

<quoted text>
God's existence don't need to be proved.

It does if you expect rational, thinking adults to believe in it.

Lyndi wrote:
<quoted text>
"SHRIEK!"

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>Off-topic and should be reported.

Do it. See where it gets you.

karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
your lack of education is showing , again
repeating mistakes, is additive and deterministic
you live in another reality, one in which you are correct.

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>Off-topic and should be reported.

Why don't you?

Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you ever see her first movie? I thought it was a riot. The second one, though, not so much.
I love her black tassles!

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>Off-topic and should be reported.

Suck fudge from my ass, bitch. Report *that.*

karl44 wrote:

CRIP BUSTERS wrote:
<quoted text>The secret is that some of us know the secret of man's existence and you do not. Obviously, you do not know the meaning of the word "secret". A secret is know by some, kept from some, and shared with those chosen.
<quoted text>
Should not be summarily dismissed, these are dangerous people who have no place in civil society.

Point taken and accepted..

Yet most people with these types of views/ beliefs tend to go un noticed in everyday life.. the internet allows us to witness the content of each other's minds..(to an extent !)
I think it would be surprising (and scary) to realise how many bigoted intolerant people there are in this world if the surface was scratched..

Buildermon101 wrote:

Go outside and look around - then come back and prove that there isn't a God.

Buck already did it.

"Anything infinite is impossible in reality. So it can't be infinite. Sorry."~ Buck Crick.

Now, let's see *you* prove there *is* a god, if you're so goddamn smart.

Buck Crick wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that your picture?
You have a very punchable face.

And you look like you just consumed 100 lbs., of "bratwurst", the kind you brats munch for brunch. I just made that up, but dude, you really look like you are ready for a good potty sit-down, for quite awhile. Hope you have a good plumber with a 100 foot snake for pulling monster wastes out of corroded sewers form extensive overuse.

Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you're a stoolphile.
:p

waaasssuuup wrote:

<quoted text>
well since all you can do is offer an "i think" followed by an opinion/insult, it is the very proof that i'm much more qualified than you are

Says the asshobbit who claims that everyone who disagrees with him is possessed by "Satan."

Catcher1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh come on, you know Buck.
He will have a very aggressive reply.
I'll bet you 80 krugerrands, eight bucks? Or 10?

80 Krugerrands

We will just have to rob the bank first.

I'll drive, you shoot