Do you believe in Evolutuion or the Bible?

Judged:

5

5

3

adam wrote:

Whats your views.

Judged:

4

2

1

monkey wrote:

I did not come from monkeys sorry

Judged:

6

4

4

Apsu wrote:

<quoted text>I love it when people say things like this.
You just illustrated that you don't even understand what evolution means.
Why would you want to go and show off how ignorant you are?

Judged:

2

2

1

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

Evolution within a species such as Great Danes and Chihuahuas is not in dispute . Evolution of one species jumping to another such as ape to man has NEVER been proven .There is NO EVIDENCE to uphold that theory .

Judged:

5

4

4

Apsu wrote:

<quoted text>Humans are apes, silly.
Species don't "jump."
But, what you are proposing is a process that takes a great many generations. Therefore, in creatures which reproduce slowly, like for instance apes, speciation would take a very long time to happen. We have seen speciation occur in species that reproduce very fast, like bacteria and even insects.

Judged:

3

2

1

The Innkeeper wrote:

I do not think they are mutually exclusive (evolution vs. Creationism). The bible's version has the problem of just who is the eyewitness that reported it, and evolution is still missing a link.
Jury is still out for me, but I favor evolution.

Judged:

4

2

1

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

<quoted text>
Evolution within a species such as Great Danes and Chihuahuas is not in dispute . Evolution of one species jumping to another such as ape to man has NEVER been proven .There is NO EVIDENCE to uphold that theory .

Judged:

3

2

2

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

<quoted text>
It's STILL A THEORY !!! UNPROVEN !!!

Judged:

4

2

1

gotnatas wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually its a theory and a fact. Its not in dispute if evolution happens, its a matter of how it happens:)

Judged:

3

2

1

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why is it called a THEORY ? If it were a fact it would not be a theory . If it's a theory then it's not a fact .

gotnatas wrote:

<quoted text>
Evolution is a FACT when describing WHAT happened and a THEORY when describing HOW things happened.
Check out this video describing the difference, its not to long :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Judged:

1

1

The Ghost Rider of NM wrote:

<quoted text>Innkeeper, I believe the Bible. There was one to witness this happening. God. He revealed to man through his prophets of the things that happened. He sent his prophets to the kings to warn them of the rath that God would loosen upon them and the nation of Israel for disobeying Him. They killed the prophets. Somewhere along the way God caused man to write the events and happenings. We called this the Old Testament. Evolution can exist as a part of God's plan of Creation. This would allow things, as the climates change and temperatures change, to adapt and change to meet these changes and not be wiped out.

Judged:

2

1

1

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

It's STILL A THEORY !!! UNPROVEN !!!

Judged:

2

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

Then why is it called a THEORY ? If it were a fact it would not be a theory . If it's a theory then it's not a fact .

Judged:

2

1

1

Apsu wrote:

<quoted text>So, what you are saying is that you don't even know what the term "theory" means when used in a scientific context.
Figures. That explains your strange claims.

Judged:

2

BoBB AKA BoBB wrote:

You're book smart and plum stupid .You will never convince me I came from an ape .

Judged:

1

Apsu wrote:

<quoted text>I notice that you still did not show that you understand what the term "theory" means in a scientific context.
Why is that?