Is homosexuality a sin?

Judged:

1

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, marriage is and has always been the reunion of of diverse genders with the ponderous propensity of human fruit.
Christian morality dictates sexual sobriety or marriage. There are no other options.
My brother calls me that all the time, and he really like me. I like you too.
Grin.

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
It's been a week, and still, no one can answer a simple question.
Why would a lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?
How does that relate to evolution?
Still Smiling.
<quoted text>
Genetic defect, or as we say, a monster mutation.
Smile.

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now chucky, don't go getting jealous. You need a brain to adopt my lingo.
smirk.
<quoted text>
Not necessary for most people.
Smile.

Judged:

1

1

RatherBeInMissouri wrote:

<quoted text>
straight forward? Hm... Couldn't that mean, if you're wife won't put out, it's still cheating if you do it with a man/prostitute? This is exactly my point on translation and interpretation. You CANNOT put meaning to something so vague and assert that it is absolute truth because someone told you it is!
<quoted text>
Why is that? shellfish caused DEATH back then, when people stuggled just live through child birth! While sex.... is just sex! Just more proof that you have been taught that God is obsessed with sex.
Death vs. love
death vs. sexual pleasure
Yeah, I can see why homos were a MUCH bigger problem in God's eyes.... LMAO

PURELYCANADIAN wrote:

<quoted text>
Why are you GAYS always trying to prove that 2 wrongs make a right!

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
No, you gave me a shallow silly personal opinion.
Nothing validated and not a single explanation of how flamboyance and butch behavior fits with evolution.

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You are making MY point because you didn't understand the context.
However, I treat all genetic defects with sensitivity and care. I am however, barbaric with denial.
So far gays and you have denied we are genetic defects, right.
I would suggest genetic defects ARE tests to see how we deal with difficulty. Denial is not a good start.
Smile.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Inherent in butch is the attempt to look AND act like a man. You ignore the degree either out of ignorance or deliberate deception.
There are other glaring inaccuracies in what you say, but the above puts you back at square one.
Please look up 'evolutionary mating behavior'. That will give you a basis to answer the second part of my question, how does butch relate to evolution?

PURELYCANADIAN wrote:

<quoted text>
I chose the Netherlands because they were the first Country to legalize gay marriages. And also because they have way better statistics. Don't like it...too bad!

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh thank you for the challenge!!!
Here is mine;
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/...
Let me return the favor and ask you for a specific study with study parameters (how they conducted the study), that show gay couples compared to straight families of all types.
Here is a example of the problem you are facing;
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/...
I eagerly await your response.
Smile.

Roadrunner wrote:

One of the final statements in the link you posted:
"We now return to the overarching question of this paper: Are we witnessing the emergence of a new family form that provides a context for children that is equivalent to the traditional marriage-based family? Even after an extensive reading of the same-sex parenting literature, the author cannot offer a high confidence, data-based “yes” or “no” response to this question. To restate, not one of the 59 studies referenced in the 2005 APA Brief (pp. 23–45; see Table 1) compares a large, random, representative sample of lesbian or gay parents and their children with a large, random, representative sample of married parents and their children. The available data, which are drawn primarily from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalizable claim either way. Such a statement would not be grounded in science. To make a generalizable claim, representative, large-sample studies are needed—many of them"
Hmmmm, seems to not back up your claim too well, does it? Did you read the entire thing? I didn't think so.<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

Roadrunner wrote:

One of the final statements in the link you posted:
"We now return to the overarching question of this paper: Are we witnessing the emergence of a new family form that provides a context for children that is equivalent to the traditional marriage-based family? Even after an extensive reading of the same-sex parenting literature, the author cannot offer a high confidence, data-based “yes” or “no” response to this question. To restate, not one of the 59 studies referenced in the 2005 APA Brief (pp. 23–45; see Table 1) compares a large, random, representative sample of lesbian or gay parents and their children with a large, random, representative sample of married parents and their children. The available data, which are drawn primarily from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalizable claim either way. Such a statement would not be grounded in science. To make a generalizable claim, representative, large-sample studies are needed—many of them"
Hmmmm, seems to not back up your claim too well, does it? Did you read the entire thing? I didn't think so.<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

1

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Look up a genetic chimera, then add a twist of hermaphrodite.
Smile/Grin
That's both of us!

Judged:

3

2

2

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
hermaphrodite is a person with both sexes to one degree or another. It may also be referred too as non-specific gender.
Therefore, you can't be a lesbian or a male.
Sheeshh....

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
When Jdumb agrees with you, that is a clear sign you missed it.
The assertion has been that gay couples with children EQUATE to natural families, BASED ON THE STUDIES THE ARTICLE JUST DEBUNKED.
Those studies were not just paraded on here, they were used to approve gay adoption, support foster care by gays and even remove children from natural parents.
The author is simply saying, "Not so fast". The facts are not there.
Smile.

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? The doctors lied to me? My parents? My vagina, penis and three nipples are not really there? I don't have the genetic code of two people?
I'm not a monster mutation?!?
Smile.

Judged:

1

1

1

Jedi Mind Trickers wrote:

<quoted text>Wow, get an education. Hermaphroditus is only found in children. When children grow into puberty, a gender is specified and they are called intersexed, one sex is operative. Some have functioning ovaries and other male sperms, the females also have wombs and can have children. Therefore, you can be either a lesbian, gay or heterosexual. Get an education.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm Italian.
By wife is never bored with the natural way.
Grin.