Bush To Lift Key Sanctions On N. Korea

What a loser. Let's lift sactions for a country we KNOW has WOMD. He sends very mixed messages...probably why most countries are looking at us like we are a joke. He has done more to damage the USA standing in the world more than any other president!

When will somebody put USA on list of the same type? USA should be on the top of lists of countries which support terror and which spread terror all over the world. USA should be sanctioned.
Are US officials so primitiv really or they think that there are more primtive people all over the world that they are? Do they not see what they do? Illegal plundering invasions with murdering of people, hudreds of tousends people illegally jailed, tortured, whole countries destroyed just thanks to US leaders. And what about nuclear facilities and nuclear arsenal. USA is the world leader in it and it is ruled by mentally disabled people who have never had psychiatric treatment. And what about cranky and mentally ill- it is never known what can come to sick brains.

dumbass......

Bush is a joke wrote:

What a loser. Let's lift sactions for a country we KNOW has WOMD. He sends very mixed messages...probably why most countries are looking at us like we are a joke. He has done more to damage the USA standing in the world more than any other president!

Liberals... gotta love'm.. first they complain that Bush called N Korea a terrorist state, now they complain that he doesn't.

And then you bring up WMD's.. so you think we should invade N Korea? because if that's not your point, then you're a hypocrite.

CALIFORNIA IS BURNING:
This should have been cleaned up two months ago...

The Bay Area Quality Management, which is a team:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/brd/advisecouncil/membe...

Along with, the Governors Office http://gov.ca.gov/
& California Dept. Of Forestry http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/

Is compromising the health and financial well being of Silicon Valley!

** TODAY, THURSDAY 06/26 FIRE STATUS **

Total Fires: 1,032
Acres: 132,235
Contained Fires: 232
Personnel Committed: 11,989

Resources Committed:
Fire Engines: 941
Hand Crews: 271
Dozers: 291
Water Tenders: 360
Helicopters: 42
Air Tankers: 6

**These numbers are totals from state, local and federal firefighting agencies. Updated 6/25 at 11:45 p.m.**


QUESTION: How much is this costing and going to cost taxpayers because of in-action two months ago?

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>
Liberals... gotta love'm.. first they complain that Bush called N Korea a terrorist state, now they complain that he doesn't.
And then you bring up WMD's.. so you think we should invade N Korea? because if that's not your point, then you're a hypocrite.

Name ONE person whom complained about NK being called a terror state.

Just one.

Bet you won't, or can't.

About the WMD, you guys lied about that stuff in Iraq, and used it as a reason to invade, so why not NK? Why didn't we invade them, since they clearly DO have WMD's. Why is some a hypocrite for bringing that up?

This is appeasment!

Why is the coward in chief, gwb appeasing the terrorists?

This is nothing except a clear case of appeasment!

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
Name ONE person whom complained about NK being called a terror state.
Just one.
Bet you won't, or can't.
About the WMD, you guys lied about that stuff in Iraq, and used it as a reason to invade, so why not NK? Why didn't we invade them, since they clearly DO have WMD's. Why is some a hypocrite for bringing that up?

So you want us to invade N Korea?

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
Name ONE person whom complained about NK being called a terror state.
Just one.
Bet you won't, or can't.

I could list many, but how about just one like you asked... Jon Stewart (The Daily Show).

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>
So you want us to invade N Korea?

No, I was trying to mimic what faux news, lush rimbaugh, and everyone's favorite ancor baby malkin would be tellinbg you to scream as loud a spossible, wherever possible, if this were a Democratic President that did this.

You know you would. But of course, It's OK If You're Republican, right?

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>I could list many, but how about just one like you asked... Jon Stewart (The Daily Show).

You aren't very bright, are you? The Daily Show is SATIRE.

sat·ire
Pronunciation:\&#712;sa- &#716;t&#299;(-&#6 01;)r\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin satura, satira, perhaps from (lanx) satura dish of mixed ingredients, from feminine of satur well-fed; akin to Latin satis enough — more at sad
Date: 1501
1 : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn
2 : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly
synonyms see wit

So yes, name someone and link to it as well, because I think you're full of shiate.

bush is a total idoit he only lifted santions to sabotage the next adminisration. he does not care what shape he leaves the country in. i say lets impeach him and his little dog to.

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You aren't very bright, are you? The Daily Show is SATIRE.
sat·ire
Pronunciation:\&#712;sa- &#716;t&#299;(-&#6 01;)r\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin satura, satira, perhaps from (lanx) satura dish of mixed ingredients, from feminine of satur well-fed; akin to Latin satis enough — more at sad
Date: 1501
1 : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn
2 : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly
synonyms see wit
So yes, name someone and link to it as well, because I think you're full of shiate.

The Daily Show stopped being satire a long time ago.

That being said, Stewart made his comments at a political function (and not as a comic), and NOT on his show.

I also love when people go to the dictionary to try to prove a point, it usually means they can't argue the topic and have to try to pick apart specific words.

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I was trying to mimic what faux news, lush rimbaugh, and everyone's favorite ancor baby malkin would be tellinbg you to scream as loud a spossible, wherever possible, if this were a Democratic President that did this.
You know you would. But of course, It's OK If You're Republican, right?
<quoted text>

And I was making the point that the same people who hated us entering Iraq for WMD's can't use this argument against N Korea unless they are trying to make an argument for Invasion. I also was making the point you tried to do above, except that I correctly showed that liberals hate everything a republican president does, even when he switches his stance. They hate him for both views even though they are opposite. It is the lib's that are the hypocrites.

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>
The Daily Show stopped being satire a long time ago.
That being said, Stewart made his comments at a political function (and not as a comic), and NOT on his show.
I also love when people go to the dictionary to try to prove a point, it usually means they can't argue the topic and have to try to pick apart specific words.

Provide a link to such.

I don't think you will though.

Because it don't exsist.

Furthermore, the Daily Show didn't stop being satire, it just has told the truth for a long time, and done so in a forcefull enough manner, that your side has no defence against it.

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>
And I was making the point that the same people who hated us entering Iraq for WMD's can't use this argument against N Korea unless they are trying to make an argument for Invasion. I also was making the point you tried to do above, except that I correctly showed that liberals hate everything a republican president does, even when he switches his stance. They hate him for both views even though they are opposite. It is the lib's that are the hypocrites.

You were not trying to make any point, I simply wrote something you didn't like, so you HAD to reply. Since you brought it up, we went to war with Iraq based on the LIE that they had WMDs.

North Korea DOES POSITIVELY HAVE WMDs yet we haven't attacked them, no will we any time soon.

The reason is simple - NK doesn't have any oil. So they are off the hook.

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
You were not trying to make any point, I simply wrote something you didn't like, so you HAD to reply. Since you brought it up, we went to war with Iraq based on the LIE that they had WMDs.
North Korea DOES POSITIVELY HAVE WMDs yet we haven't attacked them, no will we any time soon.
The reason is simple - NK doesn't have any oil. So they are off the hook.

So once again, you're saying we should invade N Korea...

This topic isn't about Iraq, yet you libs want to make is so. Bush finally did something you've been asking for, and you bash him anyway... complete hypocrites.

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
Provide a link to such.
I don't think you will though.
Because it don't exsist.
Furthermore, the Daily Show didn't stop being satire, it just has told the truth for a long time, and done so in a forcefull enough manner, that your side has no defence against it.

I didn't know they made links to TV shows. I'll have to learn that technology.

And thanks for supporting my point on the Daily Show. Not that it tells the truth (as you dilusionally state), but that it is no longer a satire, because you libs THINK it's truth (and so does the host).

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>
So once again, you're saying we should invade N Korea.

No you are. Don't put words in my mouth or try to change the subject. It the sign of a weak mind.

bryts wrote:

<quoted text>This topic isn't about Iraq, yet you libs want to make is so. Bush finally did something you've been asking for, and you bash him anyway... complete hypocrites.

I said nothing about Iraq, once again you did, in an effort to change the subject.

My original post was making fun of crap like this;

http://www.gatorcountry.com/swampgas/showthre...

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Matthews_slams_...

and you bit.

dmbywxoekqa wrote:

<quoted text>
No you are. Don't put words in my mouth or try to change the subject. It the sign of a weak mind.
<quoted text>
I said nothing about Iraq, once again you did, in an effort to change the subject.

First, it was a question, so I didn't put words in your mouth. You keep trying to make a point about WMD's. You are clearly making a comparison to Iraq, so don't lie and say you "said nothing about Iraq". You are clearly talking about the "invading" of Iraq and comparing that situation to N. Korea..

So it's more than reasonable to think you're endorsing the invasion of N. Korea since you keep bringing WMD's up in a comparison.

You are the lier. You just realize you've been called out.