There is Everything Wrong with Abortion

Grunt56 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah. Babies aren't people. Silly

Yes, a baby IS a person. A z/e/f is not. Learn the difference.

Roadrunner wrote:

No matter how much we'd like people to take personal responsibility for themselves and mistakes that are made, human nature just doesn't work like that. I feel sorry for you that you can't deal with an imperfect world. Because that's the one we live in. Life must be torture for you.<quoted text>

You feel sorry for me? I can deal with an imperfect world. YOU can't deal with an imperfect world. If you could, you'd support the life you create, not kill it.

Braxton wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not your buddy!
No one has the right to tell you what to do with your body but you seem to believe that you have the right to kill someone else's body! Your own argument can be used against you. Now that is ignorant.
You rather have those abused unwanted children killed. I would rather have them alive with a chance to experience life. The argument to abort a Human Life because it may be abused or unwanted is just EVIL and SICK!
I have adopted two children, I sponsor two other children in foreign countries, I spend time with needy children on a monthly basis thru a program my church is involved in.
How dare you get on here and attempt to boast about what you do and accuse me of doing less when you do not even know me. That is very IMMATURE!

You're also not hearing me. I HAVE NEVER HAD AN ABORTION AND DO NOT PLAN TO. IT IS NOT A CHOICE I COULD MAKE FOR MYSELF. I COULD NOT TERMINATE MY PREGNANCY AND I'M THANKFUL I'VE NEVER BEEN IN THE POSITION TO HAVE TO MAKE THAT CHOICE. I SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF WOMEN TO MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS REGARDING THEIR OWN BODIES, WHICH IS SOMETHING A CONTROL FREAK LIKE YOU WOULD MOST DEFINITELY NOT UNDERSTAND.

What about cases of rape and incest? Are those women to be forced to give birth, as well? How about in cases of such a severe deformity that the child would have little to no quality of life? Should that pregnancy also be carried to term, knowing the baby will suffer through a short and painful life?

I admire your conviction and dedication, but your stance is simply wrong. It's wrong according to most of the women in this room, it's wrong according to millions of American citizens, and perhaps most importantly, it's wrong because the Supreme Court of the United States SAYS it is. And you can say what you want, unless it is an honest, intelligent and reasonable answer to one or all of the questions I've just asked you, I will not be continuing this conversation.

Braxton wrote:

<quoted text>
You are so arrogant you couldn't tell if you lost a debate anyway. Now, Get off the computer and go out into the real world. It is not as bad as you a make it out to be.

I'm not arrogant at all. And do NOT tell me what to do. I know the real world can be a wonderful place, but not so wonderful for children born unwanted and unloved by the very person giving birth to them, but because YOU are so arrogant, I know you don't give a rat's Aunt Fanny for ANY life once it is BORN.

And don't attempt to lecture me, little boy- you're embarrassing yourself yet you are too WILLFULLY IGNORANT and INTELLECTUALLY LAZY to be able to comprehend that.

Braxton wrote:

<quoted text>
The quote above your picture says it all about you! Now I see why you are the way you are. At least you are telling everyone where you are coming from.

Have you ever noticed that the women most likely to kill their children are typically fat and ugly?

I wonder why that is.

Braxton wrote:

<quoted text>
So you say! In your own little miserable world. HELLO!!! WAKE UP!! GET OUT OF THE HOUSE!!

STOP telling me what to do.

Where are YOU posting from? The French Riviera?

And my world is anything BUT miserable.

The only people here who are miserable are you anti-choice control FREAKS since it makes you MISERABLE that you have NO say at ALL regarding the choices and decisions of anyone other than your sorry ASS selves.

Man of Science wrote:

<quoted text>Yes it is. Your being stupid doesn't change it. You've already long since proven that you have absolutely no grasp on the workings of the English language.
Oh, and you're the dumbass who's been caught in a lie; not I.

Repeating the same lie doesn't suddenly make it true. You got caught lying. Don't feel bad. Most of your counterparts have been caught lying as well.

Mpnf1979 wrote:

<quoted text>
Translation: I don't do anything but type away on this thread.
Deflection.

LOL!!!! You are the one who spends her life here! I have looked back thru this thread and you are on it all the time! You are a joke. Get a life!

Really -- SMDH wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet, this is what you posted to me:
<quoted text>
You don't know me, either, yet you jumped to conclusions. Now you're hypocritical enough to call me immature for doing the same. Odd.

Yep- according to Braxton, all of we pro-choicers are immature.

I guess Braxton has come to that conclusion based on projecting his/her own immaturity onto others......

Eh....not so odd- hypocrisy sits right alongside their WILLFUL IGNORANCE and INTELLECTUAL LAZINESS.

Man of Science wrote:

<quoted text>Once again, I never made any assumption of Lily, retard. That was YOU that did that. I am not hypocritical, as I have not passed any judgement that is not justified with supporting evidence. You, for example. You are almost inhumanly stupid. The evidence supporting this observation: every single post you make.

Not only are you hypocritical, you aren't really that bright. You've made a joke of yourself, but I don't think you even understand how. I guess that's nature's gift to the idiots of the world. You don't realize you're idiots.

You lied, you got caught. It puts everything you post into question. Stop crying about it. You made your bed.

Man of Science wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, a baby IS a person. A z/e/f is not. Learn the difference.

BZZZZZT Thanks for playing. SCOTUS disagrees with you. I'm no longer amazed at how little you gals understand the topic.

Mpnf1979 wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet you've made no difference. What's there to deal with? My opinion is the same, and I still believe in a woman's right to choose. Sorry you're having issues because of your inability to persuade any of us otherwise. Too bad, so sad.

Braxton thinks his/her use of exclamation points (when none are needed) will persuade us otherwise.

HAHAHAHAHA!

Orange County blues wrote:

<quoted text>STOP telling me what to do.
Where are YOU posting from? The French Riviera?
And my world is anything BUT miserable.
The only people here who are miserable are you anti-choice control FREAKS since it makes you MISERABLE that you have NO say at ALL regarding the choices and decisions of anyone other than your sorry ASS selves.

HAHAHA! You get your account locked, so you make a new one. You constantly post "can you see my posts". You're neurotic. No sane person is surprised you can't get a date.

Roadrunner wrote:

Don't forget the time he actually used the words "criminal killing". I already provided him with that evidence, and even with it right there in black and white, he denied it.<quoted text>

Of course he denies it. If he didn't, that would mean owning up to things that he said, even when his own words prove him wrong: something that no PLA *I* have met could ever do.

Mpnf1979 wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet you've made no difference. What's there to deal with? My opinion is the same, and I still believe in a woman's right to choose. Sorry you're having issues because of your inability to persuade any of us otherwise. Too bad, so sad.

Oh yeah- and how Braxton ERRONEOUSLY capitalizes "human life".

That's also meant to persuade us to jump at becoming members of the:

"JUST GET 'EM BORN AND THEN LET SOMEBODY ELSE WORRY ABOUT 'EM!" brigade.

Orange County blues wrote:

<quoted text>No viability, no sentience, no consciousness and no ability to choose one way or the other.
No....my own argument can NOT be used against me, but what you say here sure can be used against you- you're just another dopey worshiper of z/e/f.
And I'll ask the question- even though I know that you like all the other anti-choicers will not answer:
What would be RIGHT about women being legally forced to remain pregnant against their will in order to be legally forced to give birth against their will to babies they do not want and do not love?
And- I'll ask you a second question but I'm sure the first one already has you overwhelmed:
Why would you want babies to be born without that which at the VERY least every baby born should come into this world with- that of actually being wanted and loved by the very person giving birth to them?

Your ignorance blinds you!

Everything is right about forcing a woman to give birth to a Human Life and not killing it!

If a mother does not love or want her child should not give her the right to kill! Others will take her child in. A life that has a chance to live is much more important then the inconvenience of a pregnancy! REALLY? You are just sick!

Really -- SMDH wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet, this is what you posted to me:
<quoted text>
You don't know me, either, yet you jumped to conclusions. Now you're hypocritical enough to call me immature for doing the same. Odd.

You have stated to me what you believe in regards to this topic. It is a selfish belief. I did not jump to conclusions at all. You told me all that I or anyone would need to know.

Braxton wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL!!!! You are the one who spends her life here! I have looked back thru this thread and you are on it all the time! You are a joke. Get a life!

Deflection. And what do YOU care how ANYONE here spends their time or how much time they spend here?

Your control FREAK issues don't seem to include being able to control your OWN stupidity. No WONDER you try to control what everyone else does, since you obviously can't control YOURSELF.

And since your need to control SOMETHING or SOMEONE is SO overpowering, you have deluded yourself into thinking you can control other posters here.

Nope- you can no more control ANYONE on this thread than you can CONTROL ANYONE who seeks to exercise whatever legal reproductive right they CHOOSE to exercise for themselves and their own bodies and all that happens TO them and WITHIN them.

Deal with your control issues first; then deal with your IMPOTENCE issues.

If you do, that should keep YOU from posting here for a VERY, VERY, VERY long time.

Mpnf1979 wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet you've made no difference. What's there to deal with? My opinion is the same, and I still believe in a woman's right to choose. Sorry you're having issues because of your inability to persuade any of us otherwise. Too bad, so sad.

I am having no issues. I have proven your point to be selfish and ignorant. Enough said.

Orange County blues wrote:

<quoted text>If you could care less than you do, that means you DO care.
If you do not care at all, you would say that you *couldn't* care less.
Is English your first language?
Oh- and BTW, women who exercise their legal right to CHOICE COULDN'T care less about what YOU think they should do.
Not only does it mean nothing here, it means nothing anywhere and nothing to any woman who will do as she CHOOSES regarding her OWN unwanted pregnancy.
See how that works?

I couldn't care less means I don't care at all and there is now way possible for me to care any less than what I do. Are you stupid?