Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in 2010?

The Catholic Church excommunicates Doctor and Mother of 9 year old rape victim, but not the step-father who raped her.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/05/25/49...

I wonder why MSNBC doesn't mention Trevon Marton any more,after covering it nonstop for weeks??? You don't have to answer we already know.

The Bain strategy isn’t quite working the way Obama’s handlers thought it would.

Even the Washington Post isn’t all on board:

Despite a growing backlash from his fellow Democrats, President Obama has doubled down on his attacks on Mitt Romney’s tenure at Bain Capital. But the strategy could backfire in ways Obama did not anticipate. After all, if Romney’s record in private equity is fair game, then so is Obama’s record in public equity — and that record is not pretty.

Since taking office, Obama has invested billions of taxpayer dollars in private businesses, including as part of his stimulus spending bill. Many of those investments have turned out to be unmitigated disasters — leaving in their wake bankruptcies, layoffs, criminal investigations and taxpayers on the hook for billions.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/forget...

The Post’s View
President Obama wants it both ways on private equity

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/presid...

And while he excoriates Romney for being a Vulture Capitalist, look who’s running his campaign:

Former Denver mayor and Clinton Transportation and Energy Secretary Federico Peña is an Obama national campaign co-chair. So what?

Well, Pena is a partner in Vestar Capital, a private Equity firm.

You can’t make this crap up. Here Obama is ripping his opponent for being an evil capitalist, and his own co-chair is an evil capitalist. I guess its like Obama railing against lobbyists, and then hiring them for his administration.

Well, maybe Pena, unlike their caricature of Romney, is in business to help businesses keep their employees, right? That would make him a good democrat. Let’s take a look:

In March of 2011, Vestar acquired 100 percent of Del Monte Foods through a leveraged buyout.

Just two weeks ago, Del Monte announced the closure of a plant in Kingsburg, Calif., effectively slashing 1,000 jobs.

Obama’s co-chair has owned it for less than 2 months, and already they are putting people on welfare.

Eight years ago, Vestar purchased the Solo Cup Co. Shortly afterward, they shuttered three U.S. factories, and in 2010, Solo Cup announced plans to shut an 80-year-old factory, ending more than 540 jobs.

But wait! There’s more!

In 2002, Vestar acquired frozen food giant BirdsEye Foods. Four years later, Vestar laid off approximately 500 workers at BirdsEye.“Some of them were employed at BirdsEye for 15 to 30 years.”

Spin THAT! Suckers.

http://watchdog.org/17993/shepherd-is-former-...

CaptainofCrunch wrote:

<quoted text>
You must have missed this head line:
"Left-Wing Politico Busted Fudging Limbaugh Ratings"
and then: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/05/24/c...
The only thing wrong with your numbers...they are FAKE!
Sassy Frassy!
You have a big problem with reading comprehension; Fox has been a relative "new comer" yet they have been number one 16 years running! ABC, CBS, NBC are the Old School brain-washers of sheeple!
They are and have been the Great and All-Mighty-Oz (behind the curtain) and Fox News yanked that curtain down! Exposing the true Liberal Bias that is now called The Lame-Stream-Media!
I guess if you have never bothered to open your eyes and ears you missed that...do you get a lot of "Blinding Head aches"? living beneath such a giant rock?(may be causing them!).
I stole Obama's 'magic wand" (the one he fixed the economy with), now I'll just use this magical spell:
Mecka Lecka High, Mecka Hiney Hoe, and away you go! There...your rock is gone...ahh feel better now?
Now go find some coffee and turn on the TV, watch 15 minutes of Fox News per day for one week (don't over expose your liberalness), and within one week you may come to realize the difference between brain-food and that crap the Lame-Stream-Media feeds the mushrooms they keep in the dark!

Most people like FOX news because they love a good fiction story.

Nielsen Ratings wrote:

That's what happens when your sole source of news is MSNBC.
Cable News Ratings. MSNBC has never been higher than third and usually falls to fourth or fifth and has half the viewership of Fox news. CNN is virtually DEAD!
Net Morning programs
(6-9 AM) P2+ 25-54 ( 35-64
FNC FOX & Friends 980 295 485
CNNStarting Point 193 68 88
MSNBC Morning Joe 403 134 202
CNBC Squawk Box 128 35 82
HLN Pess w/ Meade 245 106 163
Net 5PM P2+(000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FIVE, THE 1,800 375 766
CNN Sit/Room 419 75 124
MSNBC Hardball 429 120 137
CNBC FAST MONEY 248 37 119
HLN SPECIAL REPORT 97 53 120
Net 6PM P2+(000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC W/BRET BAIER 1,857 392 718
CNN John King USA 375 94 356
MSNBC POLITICS NATION 102 139 270
CNBC Mad Money 192 34 103
HLN Prime News 209 45 115
Net 7PM P2+(000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC W/S.SMITH 1,708 397 749
CNN E/BURNETT 303 234 108
MSNBC C. MATTHEWS 525 133 230
CNBC Kudlow 185 49 94
HLN MITCHELL 252 65 158
Net 8PM P2+(000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64
FNC OREILLY FACTOR 3,217 582 1,186
CNN Anderson Cooper 360 405 118
CNBC 170 160 280
MSNBC Ed Show 104 149 342
HLN Nancy Grace 394 136 262
Net 9PM P2+(000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64
FNC Hannity 2,318 516 928
CNN Piers Morgan 765 215 171
CNBC AMERICANGREED 204 145 55
CNBC Dr. Drew 200 82 147
MSNBCRachel Maddow 461 122 189
HLN EDITION 177 73 133
Net 10PM P2+(000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC W/GRETA 1,826 479 879
CNN Cooper 360 494 209
MSNBC L/ODONNELL 895 245 366
CNBCGREED 192 92 100
HLN Nancy Grace 239 77 155
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/category/cab...

Now Darlin', I didn't say Program by Program...I said by the 3 Cable Networks OVERALL. And BTW, I didn't see a date on your statistics, so how old is this program by progam info you posted? Now, you wouldn't be trying to fool us, would you, by not using the lastest info? Nah, I didn't think so. Lol!
Oh, & just to get your circulation going good today (you know I'm always thinking of your Health)...OBAMA deserves a second Term, VOTE OBAMA! Lol!:*)

CaptainofCrunch wrote:

<quoted text>
The Bible does mention both...not favorably.
Would you call Mao Tse Tung (Mao Zedong) a humanitarian?
Your are delusional!

OA, was talking about Jesus and how someone is determined to be a Christian in the eyes of a Republican.

CaptainofCrunch wrote:

<quoted text>
The key idea:
"Were your harlotries so small a matter? You slaughtered My children and offered them up to idols by causing them to pass through the fire." Meaning did you think personal gratification was more important than the life of a child?
The book is still valid because Christianity is still here.

Christianity may still be here, but Man, it's getting harder & harder to find!

Democrats have always been able to rely on the Jewish vote. But this year is different.

When was the last time you saw a speech by a democrat, especially a Jewish, female democrat, cancelled by a Miami synagogue?

Hee Hee. The Divider in Chief has even splintered the Jews!

http://shark-tank.net/2012/05/18/debbie-wasse...

“DNC Chair/Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s partisan political tactics have brought an end to the 70 year-old relationship between Temple Israel of North Miami and one of its past presidents and most respected members, the honorable Stanley Tate.

Wasserman Schultz and Tate were both scheduled to address the Temple Israel congregation regarding U.S.-Israeli relations, but apparently Wasserman Schultz couldn’t handle the fact that Tate would undoubtedly contradict her partisan talking points- so much for “diversity” when it comes to Debbie allowing equal time to opposing points of view. In what can only be described as an act of political spite, Wasserman Schultz strongly voiced her objection to Tate’s scheduled address directly to the Temple’s Board of Trustees, and based on her objections and political pressure, the Trustees decided to scrap Tate’s address to the congregation.”

Since when does an invited speaker have any say in who else is invited to speak?

An Update:

http://shark-tank.net/2012/05/23/30108/

“The blowback from Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ political tactics that the Shark Tank first reported on last week has resulted in a unprecedented public outcry and political pressure being brought to bear on the Trustees and Rabbis of Temple Israel in Miami – pressure which may lead to the cancellation of Wasserman Schultz’ appearance at the Temple scheduled for this Friday night.”

Here’s the watered down, liberal version:

http://www.jewocity.com/blog/miami-temple-can...

Not quite the same fervor out there for Obama this time round.

CaptainofCrunch wrote:

Obfuscate , twist and turn, and redirect...you can not avoid the truth!
Liberal Gay`pro abortion`anti-Christian
Jesus was never those!
Compassion for the needy is not a criteria for liberalism...it is for Christian Conservatives!
Remeber how Democrats screamed Republican Welfare reform would starve poor Americans? It was passed in 94'& it worked and it did not starve poor Americans!

Are you sure that you don't have your Republicans & Democrats mixed up? I kinda think you have them reversed as to who did what.:>)

Some are just too lazy to drill into the link and see the date "23 May 2012" or do a series of searches right there on that same site and see that for the past three the viewership of Fox news is double that of MSNBC, CNN, HLN and triple and quadruple that of CBS, ABC, NBC. But then that's fairly typical isn't it? Too lazy to do one's own research. If you weren't looking for demographics, overall viewership, "Prime Time" ratings what are you looking for or basing your statements on?

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
Now Darlin', I didn't say Program by Program...I said by the 3 Cable Networks OVERALL. And BTW, I didn't see a date on your statistics, so how old is this program by progam info you posted? Now, you wouldn't be trying to fool us, would you, by not using the lastest info? Nah, I didn't think so. Lol!
Oh, & just to get your circulation going good today (you know I'm always thinking of your Health)...OBAMA deserves a second Term, VOTE OBAMA! Lol!:*)

You are either too stupid to understand the i.fo poster, too stupid to open the source link or just trying to impress your colleagues on hefe by posting bogus misingormation. I think all of the above. Im sure "Dulapian and MA"are Really Really impressed with your ability to accurately pull statistics out of thin air. You dont help the cause by doi.g this, you damage it.

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
Christianity may still be here, but Man, it's getting harder & harder to find!

what is getting easier to find? Youre much closer to deaths door than most on here.

Belmont hill Mitt wrote:

<quoted text>
the record number of people watching faux news just mean that all the idiots finnally found a source of universally acceptable tripe to watch!!

Then admittingly you must not agree with the previous post by Really Sassy and that her facts are simply disinformation? Your posts are at least somewhat intelligent dont damage your cause by trying to defend the undefensable.

Nielsen Ratings wrote:

Some are just too lazy to drill into the link and see the date "23 May 2012" or do a series of searches right there on that same site and see that for the past three the viewership of Fox news is double that of MSNBC, CNN, HLN and triple and quadruple that of CBS, ABC, NBC. But then that's fairly typical isn't it? Too lazy to do one's own research. If you weren't looking for demographics, overall viewership, "Prime Time" ratings what are you looking for or basing your statements on?

I didn't even click on your Link & I don't mind telling you. The reason being that after years of comparing Sources & what they report, comparing their reporting to what I know to be true from seeing it live as it happened, mostly on CSPAN's coverage of the Live Congressional daily happenings on the floor of the House & Senate...I sorted out the best & most accurate News Reporting Sources & they are all on my News Feeds. The others, especially those I've never heard of, I pretty much ignore because I know they are not accurate or they are just promoting an Agenda because they are Propaganda Sources & Sites. There are some "Liberal" Sites that still do impartial Reporting, even though they freely admit they are a Liberal Site, but I have never found a Conservative Site that did not do Biased Reporting. They may be some out there, but I haven't found them, & I've looked, trust me! So, that's why I didn't click on your Link. You can call it lazy, but I call it not caring anything about reading Fiction. It's a waste Of my time that can be spent on trying to learn the truth...and the truth is important to me, especially in Politics where so much is at stake, IMO!

Duke Lady wrote:

<quoted text>what is getting easier to find? Youre much closer to deaths door than most on here.

Now, how would you have any way of knowing that? Are you saying that you're GOD? You could die in a car accident, have a Heart Attack, fall off a Ladder, or any number of things tomorrow & be dead as a doornail...& so could I. That's something that none of us know, so you're kinda overstepping your boundaries alittle, aren't you?

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't even click on your Link & I don't mind telling you. The reason being that after years of comparing Sources & what they report, comparing their reporting to what I know to be true from seeing it live as it happened, mostly on C SPAN coverage of the Live Congressional daily happenings on the floor of the House & Senate...I sorted out the best & most accurate News Reporting Sources & they are all on my News Feeds. The others, especially those I've never heard of, I pretty much ignore because I know they are not accurate or they are just promoting an Agenda because they are Propaganda Sources & Sites. There are some "Liberal" Sites that still do impartial Reporting, even though they freely admit they are a Liberal Site, but I have never found a Conservative Site that did not do Biased Reporting. They may be some out there, but I haven't found them, & I've looked, trust me! So, that's why I didn't click on your Link. You can call it lazy, but I call it not caring anything about reading Fiction. It's a waste Of my time that can be spent on trying to learn the truth...and the truth is important to me, especially in Politics where so much is at stake, IMO!

Then the post you made earlier "Fox in third" is a complete fabrication. You can't possible find that info on CSPAN. The Nielsen ratings for cable news is the source used. So when you decide to post your disinformation think about what you're doing and how it affects your ability to pursued in the future. Posting disinformation is a sure way to become completely irrelevant. Would you please post those "Liberal" sites (links to those sites) you say do "impartial" reporting. I think we would all like to check them out.

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
Now, how would you have any way of knowing that? Are you saying that you're GOD? You could die in a car accident, have a Heart Attack, fall off a Ladder, or any number of things tomorrow & be dead as a doornail...& so could I. That's something that none of us know, so you're kinda overstepping your boundaries alittle, aren't you?

GOD? Im simply speaking in general terms of normalcy and age...all things being equal of course. NOT in terms of acts of GOD or disasters, accidents, or premature death. In terms of age progression (according to your bio) youre much closer to death than say I at 37.

Nielsen Ratings wrote:

<quoted text>Then the post you made earlier "Fox in third" is a complete fabrication. You can't possible find that info on CSPAN. The Nielsen ratings for cable news is the source used. So when you decide to post your disinformation think about what you're doing and how it affects your ability to pursued in the future. Posting disinformation is a sure way to become completely irrelevant. Would you please post those "Liberal" sites (links to those sites) you say do "impartial" reporting. I think we would all like to check them out.

Darlin', all you have to do is look at the Source for every Link that I've ever put up...they're in the Link. I'm not quite positive about "AddictingInfo" yet, because it's a new one that somebody just recently mad me aware of. It's takes awhile to completely confirm their accuracy, but so far, so good. All the Others that my Links come from, I'm sure of the accuracy of the info in the Links that I've posted. If any of them are found NOT to be accurate, then there are no accurate Reports out there on the subject of that particular Link!
BTW, I've got about 300 or more Sources, World-wide, is the reason I don't list them for you & some of them only send Headline emails now...I subscribed to them back when they send Headline News Feeds, which they have discontinued, especially the free ones, but I still get most of them on my Homepage, updated several times daily, for free.
So, when you see a Link that I've put up, scroll down to the bottom & see if they still offer a direct Hews Feed to your Homepage, or to your email, if you don't mind that. I prefer my Homepage because I check those more than my email News Feeds. But, alot of them are the same Stories, reworded, from the different Sources, such as Associated Press & Reuters (a Right-Leaning Source, btw, but still pretty accurate on International Stories).

Duke Lady wrote:

<quoted text>GOD? Im simply speaking in general terms of normalcy and age...all things being equal of course. NOT in terms of acts of GOD or disasters, accidents, or premature death. In terms of age progression (according to your bio) youre much closer to death than say I at 37.

The last one in the skit
She thinks shes' hot shit but she's just a cold fart warmed up

Leroy Snot wrote:

<quoted text>Check vet out here. 10 through 19. vet has a mental problem! http://www.topix.com/issue/immigration/p10

Does your ass get jealous of the shit that comes out of your mouth?