Obama's challenge to the Supreme Court may herald a campaign issue for the president this fall

Judged:

2

2

2

You know wrote:

<quoted text>
that was a political stunt, dummy? you fell for it.

Judged:

2

2

2

More wrote:

<quoted text>
like a wave of spam bs.

Tripp Casey wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly what all you libtards think about facts. All of these are posted from neutral sites, and one from the left leaning Washington Post. Its real, solid evidence to prove your savior is failing.

Judged:

1

1

1

Cat74 wrote:

Mitt Romney will win in November for one reason, and one reason only, Barack Hussein Obama. The productive half of America is totally fed up taking care of the non productive half, and it will come down to who shows up to vote, but Americans are really disgusted with this Administration, and it's one sided governance.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tripp Casey wrote:

<quoted text>
Its not a deflection, moron, and with the little judgments above my comment and a few others on this thread, it is clear you guys would wipe your a$$ with the Constitution. That is what is scary. My answer is simple. I am not rich. I am not white. I am not being helped by any FHA, VA, NAACP, UNCF, or credit my accomplishments anywhere but the ability to be free and make my own path. Government creates problems, not solves them. They enforce separation by catering to class, race, and whatever separation they can. We are all people. The only thing that needs separation by color is laundry, not people. By the way, idiot, it was the Constitution that allowed any policy that anyone has benefited from. How is that deflection? Then again, you are one that cant see the Rockies because all the mountains are in the way.

Judged:

1

1

1

Kathwynn wrote:

<quoted text>
Again with the deflection.. As has been shown.. Common sense and logic are not your friends..

Judged:

1

1

1

Tripp Casey wrote:

<quoted text>
What about all the logic/facts I posted? What does your "common sense" say about that? I dont see a self professed witch having much of either. Basically you are saying the Constitution doesnt matter, only policy. All policy has to abide by that document you hate so much.

Judged:

1

1

1

Kathwynn wrote:

<quoted text>
What facts? a bunch of republican/tea baggers talking points?
if that is all you have then this is well ovefr and as no one else has posted here since Friday. Well i am willing to let this go. Come Nov. we will see which person elected.
And then we will see whether the republic/tea baggers can hold on to what they do have.
see you in Nov.:)

Tripp Casey wrote:

<quoted text> Life is hard, but even harder when youre stupid.

RayOne wrote:

WH thuggery.

Judged:

1

1

1

Just wrote:

<quoted text>
say the n-word if that is what you mean.
But in any case for a couple of generations we've heard criticism of the court for their imagined political overreach, yet now it is when it is most blatant these hypocrites sing a different song.

Tripp Casey wrote:

<quoted text>
There isnt even a public verdict yet. And yes, its about time the court stick to the Constitution like it was constructed to do. What about that is hypocrisy? Justice is only fair for the left when it is in their favor. That is hypocrisy.

Judged:

1

1

1

nope wrote:

<quoted text>
hypocrisy is the mock outrage at the president expressing his restrained opinion on the potential outcome based on the partisan politicing indicated by the line of questioning and the past corrupt decisions and overreach of this particular court while the radical right has been virulent and vocal in their criticism of the SCOTUS since the 50s.

Tripp Casey wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, but that is your stupidity and ignorance clouding your judgement because of your dependence on the government to supply you with basic needs the rest of us work for. Of course people are going to get pissed when they bust their a$$ to feed, clothe, shelter, and pay for your checkups. If you worked you would feel the same.