Video: Boehner's eye-opening comments on Romney

The scariest thing for these right-wingers is that no matter how bad conditions may seem to get on the economic landscape, as long as flip-flopping empty suit Mormon RINO Mitt Romney is the candidate -President Obama will remain well positioned to win re-election…

Only a real Jackass would "Fall In Love" with a Politician.

That's why when you watched the slobbering open mouth wet kisses Chris Matthews was giving to other Jackasscrat Men when Obama was near was an eye opener. It proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they'd lost ALL of their objectivity.


When Matthews then admitted he would cast aside intelligent journalistic viewpoints to be Obama's #1 Cheerleader regardless how dreadful the Obama Crime, wide people took 2 steps back and recognized how sad the left had become.

While Obama is indeed a Criminal, we the voter are Not Looking for another faux Messiah. We know President Romney will inevitably make a few mistakes but overall, his successful executive experience and problem solving skills will win the day for this country...


Should President Romney Commit Crimes like Obama has, he should be held accountable but if and when he does a Good Job, the Jackasscrats will need to admit Obama killed their once proud party and start on the long road to rebuild it.

Obama 'Devastating' For Civil Liberties

Talk of the Nation
October 10, 2011

Jonathan Turley argues in a recent op-ed in the Los Angeles Times that "the election of Barack Obama may stand as one of the single most devastating events in our history for civil liberties." He says President Obama has continued many of the most controversial Bush administration programs.

JOHN DONVAN, host: And now, the Opinion Page. After eight years under President Bush, many civil libertarians were thrilled when Barack Obama won the 2008 election. What a difference a few years make. Law Professor Jonathan Turley argues in a recent op-ed that, quote, "the election of Barack Obama may stand as one of the single most devastating events in our history for civil liberties." Now, if you supported President Obama in the last election, we want to know: How important is this issue of civil liberties to you? Will it make or break your support for the president going forward?

So Jonathan Turley, he's a law professor at George Washington University. His piece, "Obama: A Disaster for Civil Liberties," ran last month in the Los Angeles Times, and he joins us now in Studio 3A. So you say of President Obama that his election may be one of the single most devastating events in our history for civil liberties? That is very, very strong language, Jonathan.

JONATHAN TURLEY: It is a strong language, but I think civil libertarians are coming to grips with what is really a building disaster for our movement, and it's been a rather difficult process. You know, I have a large civil liberties blog, and there's a lot of soul-searching among civil libertarians about what exactly happened. But we are engaging in a sense of collective denial when we deal with President Obama.

DONVAN: You mean you're not talking about it publicly.

TURLEY: Yeah. And I think that's part of the purpose of this column, is to address the fact that President Obama is a perfect nightmare when it comes to civil liberties. He not only adopted most of President Bush's policies in the civil liberties areas when it comes to terrorism, but he actually expanded on them. He outdid George Bush.

And they range. His position on torture and refusing to have people investigated or prosecuted for torture, on privacy lawsuits. He pushed aggressively for the dismissal of dozens of lawsuits brought by private interest organizations. He's for immunity for people who engaged in warrantless surveillance. He has fought standing for people even to be able to get courts to review his programs, much like George Bush. He kept military tribunals and the authority to make the discretionary choice of sending some people to a real court, some people to a military tribunal. He has asserted the right to kill U.S. citizens based solely on his own discretion, that he believes them to be a threat to the country.

His administration has, once again, as with the Bush administration, cited secret law, that - and including a case of assassinating citizens - a law that we're not allowed to see, but we have to trust them.



http://www.npr.org/2011/10/10/141213273/op-ed...

The Exasperation of the Democratic Billionaire

Real-estate and newspaper mogul Mortimer Zuckerman voted for Obama but began seeing trouble as soon as the stimulus went into the pockets of municipal unions.

By JAMES FREEMAN
New York

'It's as if he doesn't like people," says real-estate mogul and New York Daily News owner Mortimer Zuckerman of the president of the United States. Barack Obama doesn't seem to care for individuals, elaborates Mr. Zuckerman, though the president enjoys addressing millions of them on television.

The Boston Properties CEO is trying to understand why Mr. Obama has made little effort to build relationships on Capitol Hill or negotiate a bipartisan economic plan. A longtime supporter of the Democratic Party, Mr. Zuckerman wrote in these pages two months ago that the entire business community was "pleading for some kind of adult supervision" in Washington and "desperate for strong leadership." Writing soon after the historic downgrade of U.S. Treasury debt by Standard & Poor's, he wrote, "I long for a triple-A president to run a triple-A country."

His words struck a chord. When I visit Mr. Zuckerman this week in his midtown Manhattan office, he reports that three people approached him at dinner the previous evening to discuss his August op-ed. Among business executives who supported Barack Obama in 2008, he says, "there is enormously widespread anxiety over the political leadership of the country." Mr. Zuckerman reports that among Democrats, "The sense is that the policies of this government have failed....

What they say about [Mr. Obama] when he's not in the room, so to speak, is astonishing."




http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297...

Obama: A divisive POS


We are sitting on the 18th floor of a skyscraper the day after protesters have marched on the homes of other Manhattan billionaires. It may seem odd that most of the targeted rich people had nothing to do with creating the financial crisis. But as Mr. Zuckerman ponders the Occupy Wall Street movement, he concludes that "the door to it was opened by the Obama administration, going after the 'millionaires and billionaires' as if everybody is a millionaire and a billionaire and they didn't earn it....

To fan that flame of populist anger I think is very divisive and very dangerous for this country."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297...

Obama's AmeriKKKa?



It is a subject he has obviously studied at length, and he explains how the real unemployment rate is actually well above the official level of 9.1%, which only measures people who have applied for a job within the previous four weeks. In fact, he says, unemployment has even surged beyond the Department of Labor's "U-6" number of 16.5% that has received increasing attention lately because it includes people who have given up looking for work within the past year, plus people who have been cut back from full-time employees to part-timers.

Mr. Zuckerman says that when you also consider the labor-force participation rate and the so-called "birth-death series" that measures business starts and failures, the real U.S. unemployment rate is now 20%. His voice rising with equal parts anger and sadness, he exclaims, "That's not America!"



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297...

The laughing liberal wrote:

Only a real Jackass would "Fall In Love" with a Politician.

Didn't you give Bush eight years of knob jobs?

The laughing liberal wrote:

Only a real Jackass would "Fall In Love" with a Politician.

Please tell that to all the knuckle-dragging tea-baggers who are still dry-humping the corpse of Ronald Reagan, LOL.

Obama: An unmitigated Failure


Mr. Zuckerman maintains that America will solve its problems over the long haul—"I am not somebody who's pessimistic about this country. I have had a life that's been better than my fantasies," he says—but he's certainly pessimistic about the current administration. That began shortly after inauguration day in 2009.

At that time he supported Mr. Obama's call for heavy spending on infrastructure. "But if you look at the make-up of the stimulus program," says Mr. Zuckerman, "roughly half of it went to state and local municipalities, which is in effect to the municipal unions which are at the core of the Democratic Party." He adds that "the Republicans understood this" and it diminished the chances for bipartisan legislating.

Then there was health-care reform: "Eighty percent of the country wanted them to get costs under control, not to extend the coverage.


I always had the feeling the country looked at that bill and said,'Well, he may be doing it because he wants to be a transformational president, but I want to get my costs down!'"




http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297...

The Fool: Obama thinks speeches equals governing


Another speech from this guy?
The country knows this is just another speech. They understand it almost instantaneously, and his numbers have continued to go down for that reason. What the country wanted was some way of coming up with a solution."

The only solution Mr. Zuckerman sees now to juice the economy "is to broaden the tax base and simplify and lower tax [rates]. To me that will be as close to revenue-neutral as you're going to have so it isn't going to be seen as a budget buster."


Mr. Zuckerman sees a need for a cooperative effort like that of President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill when they reformed Social Security in 1983. That wasn't a permanent solution, of course, as Social Security needs more significant changes now, but Mr. Zuckerman sees it as a model of bipartisan progress.

Unprompted, he spends much of our discussion reminiscing about the Reagan presidency. Mr. Zuckerman has for years owned U.S. News and World Report, and in 1986 its Moscow correspondent Nicholas Daniloff was seized without warning by the KGB.

Mr. Zuckerman immediately flew to Russia but returned home when Soviet officials refused to release their new prisoner. "I worked in the White House for the next four weeks virtually every day and through that I met Reagan," says Mr. Zuckerman. Reagan secured Mr. Daniloff's release in a swap that included a Soviet spy held in the U.S.

"Reagan surprised me," says Mr. Zuckerman. "He got the point of every argument.... He was very decisive. And everybody loved working for him. They followed his lead because they really respected his decisiveness and his instincts."

'I was not a Republican and I was not an admirer of his before I knew him," continues Mr. Zuckerman.

The opposite is true of people meeting Obama.

(D) Zuckerman knows good leadership from bad


Somebody like Reagan had that authority. He was liked so much and he had a kind of moral authority. That's what this president has lost."

"Democracy does not work without the right leadership," he says later, "and you can't play politics." The smile inspired by Reagan memories is gone now and Mr. Zuckerman is pounding his circular conference table. "The country has got to come to the conclusion at some point that what you're doing is not just because of an ideology or politics but for the interests of the country."



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297...

Mykro wrote:

<quoted text> Didn't you give Bush eight years of knob jobs?

No. Most observers said it was someone closely resembling your mother.

Our Divisive President


Barack Obama promised a new era of post-partisanship. In office, he's played racial politics and further split the country along class and party lines.


By PATRICK H. CADDELL
DOUGLAS E. SCHOEN

During the election campaign, Barack Obama sought to appeal to the best instincts of the electorate, to a post-partisan sentiment that he said would reinvigorate our democracy. He ran on a platform of reconciliation—of getting beyond "old labels" of right and left, red and blue states, and forging compromises based on shared values.

President Obama's Inaugural was a hopeful day, with an estimated 1.8 million people on the National Mall celebrating the election of America's first African-American president. The level of enthusiasm, the anticipation and the promise of something better could not have been more palpable.

And yet, it has not been realized. Not at all.

Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship. Moreover, his cynical approach to governance has encouraged his allies to pursue a similar strategy of racially divisive politics on his behalf.

The first hint that as president Mr. Obama would be willing to interject race into the political dialogue came last July, when he jumped to conclusions about the confrontation between Harvard Prof. Henry Louis "Skip" Gates and the Cambridge police.

During a press conference, the president said that the "Cambridge police acted stupidly," and he went on to link the arrest with the "long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately."

In truth, the Gates incident appears to have had nothing to do with race—a Cambridge review committee that investigated the incident ruled on June 30 that there was fault on both sides.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274...

Obama: The Illegal Amnesty Azz


Sen. Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.) has said the president told him in a closed-door meeting that he would not move to secure the border with Mexico unless and until Congress reached a breakthrough on comprehensive immigration reform. That's another indication Mr. Obama is willing to continue to play politics with hot-button issues.

Add in the lawsuit against the Arizona immigration law and it's clear the Obama administration is willing to run the risk of dividing the American people along racial and ethnic lines to mobilize its supporters—particularly Hispanic voters, whose backing it needs in the fall midterm elections and beyond.

As the Washington Post reported last week, two top White House strategists, speaking on condition of anonymity, have indicated that "the White House plans to use the immigration debate to punish the GOP and aggressively seek the Latino vote in 2012."


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274...

The president had a unique opportunity to focus on overarching issues of importance to whites and blacks. He has failed to address the critical challenges. He has not used his bully pulpit to emphasize the importance of racial unity and the common interest of poor whites and blacks who need training, job opportunities, and the possibility of realizing the American Dream. He hasn't done enough to address youth unemployment—which in the white community is 23.2% and in the black community is 39.9%.

Mr. Obama has also cynically divided the country on class lines. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and corporations behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda.

WHERE ARE THE JOBS Blobama?




How many Fundraisers with the Mega-Rich have you attended this week instead of working on the Economy?


Oh! Dats Right! All you care about is YOUR PERSONAL ECONOMY! YOUR CAMPAIGN FINANCES!



What Filth!

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

<quoted text>
Please tell that to all the knuckle-dragging tea-baggers who are still dry-humping the corpse of Ronald Reagan, LOL.

Dipsh*t,
Reagan made mistakes but his overall presidency was a Gem.

Clinton made mistakes but his 2000 Budget was $1.7 Trillion and hte Azz Wipe Obama's is suddenly $3.7 TRILLION!


Only a blind Jackass would see Obama's $1.65 TRILLION Budget Deficits and say: HEY, WAIT A MINUTE!

If we went back to Clinton's 2000 Budget, when no one starved and the world was perfect, We'd Have a Surplus!

How about it loon!


LMAO!

Finally,
President Obama also exacerbated partisan division, and he has made it clear that he intends to demonize the Republicans and former President George W. Bush in the fall campaign. In April, the Democratic National Committee released a video in which the president directly addressed his divide-and-conquer campaign strategy, with an appeal to: "young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 [to] stand together once again."

President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture. Meanwhile, the Republican leadership has failed to put forth an agenda that is more positive, unifying or inclusive. We are stronger when we debate issues and purpose, and we are all weaker when we divide by race and class. We will pay a price for this type of politics.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274...

Obama's Solyndra Scandal widens

By Matthew Boyle,
The Daily Caller

A Daily Caller review of the George Kaiser Family Foundation’s income tax returns found that during the same year billionaire investor George Kaiser successfully secured $535 million in government loan guarantees for the now-failed solar panel manufacturer Solyndra, his private philanthropy donated to a political cause close to the hearts of several high-ranking Obama administration officials.

Kaiser, a major Obama donor, was a frequent White House visitor during the week before the Obama administration approved that taxpayer-underwritten financial deal.

A $10,000 donation to the Urban Health Initiative at the University of Chicago Medical Center appears on the group’s 2009 tax forms. It was also in 2009 that Kaiser successfully sought to lock down a loan guarantee for the green-energy company Solyndra through his two investment vehicles: Argonaut Ventures and the GKFF Investment Company.

While this donation seems small compared to the far larger numbers involved in the Solyndra scandal, it adds to the pattern of possible connections between the Obama administration and the growing Solyndra scandal.

Several of President Barack Obama’s senior inner-circle advisers worked with or for now-first lady Michelle Obama when she held a leadership post at the University of Chicago Medical Center and helped create the Urban Health Initiative program.


http://nation.foxnews.com/solyndra/2011/09/19...

Obama's Billionaire Financier George Soros: Nazi Collaborator has "No Regrets"


Financier George Soros learned Predatory/Parasite Finance at an early age: as a teenage adopted "non-Jew", Soros helped HUNGARIAN NAZIS Catalogue and SEIZE Hungarian Jewish property... before those Jewish familes were sent off to Auschwitz and other Nazi death camps.
Alex Jones finds the transcripts, and a short audio clip, of George Soros' infamous live interview on CBS' 60 Minutes Dec 20, 1998...

....in which George Soros describes the year (1944) during which his Jewish father handed the young, 14 year old George over to be adopted by a non-Jewish Hungarian "godfather" so to avoid deportation to the death camps.

Soros then accompanied his new, adoptive father on visits to Jewish homes and communities, where Soros and his parent catalogued Jewish property, in prelude to those Jewish families being deported to death camps.

Soros:
"It was actually probably the happiest year of my life, that year of German occupation. For me, it was a very positive experience, it was a strange thing, you see incredible suffering around you, and in fact you are in considerable danger yourself.
But you are 14 years old, you don't believe, it can actually touch you. You have a belief in yourself, you have a belief in your father, it's a very... happy-making [sic] exhilerating experience."

Well fed and well clothed - if dispossesed and terrified - Hungarian Jews arrive at the Auschwitz death camp in mid/late 1944. These victims had been friends, neighbors, and co-religionists of the young George Soros in the pre-Nazi occupation years in Hungary:


What Filth!