Ticking clock, rising Israeli fears and the price of gas push Iran to top of US worry list

Kirst wrote:

One time and optimally now, normal preisdent in USA and it will be much positive changes. No more global murderers, genocides and war criminals. Normal president in USA, it is the only solution.

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
I know it was the UK, but US supported UK in doing that. The Jews and Muslims were friendly to eachother, while before they could eat with eachother, now they are quarantined from eachother. Who implies that God is real? Christianity cannot decide as well: catholicism or protestantism or orthodoxinsm? The west blames somebody else for their own mistakes instead of admitting it, intervention in Iran is not the solution, instead, we should leave it to the hands of the revolution which could return the middle east to state it should be.

DENG wrote:

LET'S HOPE THE UNITD SATES OF AMERICA IS FLATTENED SOON BY NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

tapmcfarland wrote:

<quoted text>
i agree, i do not see an invasion of iran on israel's part however the state of iran seems threatening to everyone. at one time it seemed maybe they would set an example for the rest of the muslim world but currently they have gotten off track again. the fact that iran would love to erase those people away is a threat to everyone, this is not how civilizations act. no one wants a WWWIII, what do you propose? too many people blame jews, why? just as too many people blame muslims. people need to move on and let the past go.

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't find Iran as a big threat, it is a major representative of the shiite religion which is opposed to sunni (Something like protestantism vs. catholicism in the 1600's), and it's sphere of influence is crumbling due to revolutions.
Of course nobody wants WW3, but nobody wants trillions of dollars thrown out of the window either.

tapmcfarland wrote:

<quoted text>
they have always been a threat but that is partly on the brits and united states fault. for example the early 1900s and the 1950's issues in which we felt the need to stick our nose in their business. but no they are by no means like protestantism or catholicism because those two have no desire to eliminate another people,(jews.) also our religious wars are within ourselves, our deeds and wordly issues,(not people.) we do not blame culture or civilizations for our wrong doings. we christians take that blame ourselves and ask for forgivness if looking for salvation in Jesus and God. where as the others, look for wars against people blaming them as infindels. that philosophy is warped, no God or messenger would blame and entire culture or people for sin. that idea would go against the theory of a supreme perfect being.

tapmcfarland wrote:

<quoted text>
they have always been a threat but that is partly on the brits and united states fault. for example the early 1900s and the 1950's issues in which we felt the need to stick our nose in their business. but no they are by no means like protestantism or catholicism because those two have no desire to eliminate another people,(jews.) also our religious wars are within ourselves, our deeds and wordly issues,(not people.) we do not blame culture or civilizations for our wrong doings. we christians take that blame ourselves and ask for forgivness if looking for salvation in Jesus and God. where as the others, look for wars against people blaming them as infindels. that philosophy is warped, no God or messenger would blame and entire culture or people for sin. that idea would go against the theory of a supreme perfect being.

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
The Chirstians in the 1600's wanted to wipe out Islam.
They have not always been a threat, they began to be a threat until they uprised against the US installed dictator.

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
The Chirstians in the 1600's wanted to wipe out Islam.
They have not always been a threat, they began to be a threat until they uprised against the US installed dictator.

tapmcfarland wrote:

<quoted text>
the crusades much earlier and yes you are correct but during that time those idiots burned everyone, it was good to be king and clergy and anything other suffered. i know that in the beginning the muslims excepted those who converted and early in ancient civilizations a converter was still allowed to worship their own God, however if you did not convert then you were killed. religous wars are nonsense. it goes against the entire idea of God or supreme being. why would a creator of life create different people with different faiths only to kill each other off in "his" divine name? seems a bit stupid. there are many faiths in the world all with different factions, how can a people judge one as more in favor of the other, that idea is backwards. i dont care who your God is, let God be God and judge who is right or wrong. declaring war, or hate in the name of a God is not Godly. so sorry although islam and christianity have many similarities they are not the same as you stated. killing others in the name of religion is wrong, and right now i see "some" muslims with this desire. do they have the right to hate the west, yes. but americans could say the same thing about the brits, but we dont. mexico could say the same thing about the united states. the native americans could say the same thing about the americans but they dont, everyone moves on. the majority of the issues right now in our world stem from "religion" not money or trade or oil, its "religion."

Kenhunt wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a poor student of history, dude.

tapmcfarland wrote:

<quoted text>
the crusades much earlier and yes you are correct but during that time those idiots burned everyone, it was good to be king and clergy and anything other suffered. i know that in the beginning the muslims excepted those who converted and early in ancient civilizations a converter was still allowed to worship their own God, however if you did not convert then you were killed. religous wars are nonsense. it goes against the entire idea of God or supreme being. why would a creator of life create different people with different faiths only to kill each other off in "his" divine name? seems a bit stupid. there are many faiths in the world all with different factions, how can a people judge one as more in favor of the other, that idea is backwards. i dont care who your God is, let God be God and judge who is right or wrong. declaring war, or hate in the name of a God is not Godly. so sorry although islam and christianity have many similarities they are not the same as you stated. killing others in the name of religion is wrong, and right now i see "some" muslims with this desire. do they have the right to hate the west, yes. but americans could say the same thing about the brits, but we dont. mexico could say the same thing about the united states. the native americans could say the same thing about the americans but they dont, everyone moves on. the majority of the issues right now in our world stem from "religion" not money or trade or oil, its "religion."

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
Woops. No. In fact, I am very interested in modern history. Just excuse me that I am too young to possibly understand everthing.
I know you view this differently, but I view it that way, and just because most people are unaware of this doesn't mean i need to lrn2history.

Kenhunt wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't say you were not interested, just ignorant of the facts.

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
I am presenting facts.
watutalkingaboutCJ?

Czechia wrote:

<quoted text>
The Chirstians in the 1600's wanted to wipe out Islam.
They have not always been a threat, they began to be a threat until they uprised against the US installed dictator.