GOP on health care: Repeal quickly, replace slowly

Full story: CBS News
WASHINGTON &#8212 Congressional Republicans intend to seek quick repeal of any parts of the health care law that survive a widely anticipated Supreme Court ruling, but don't plan to push replacement measures until after the fall elections or perhaps 2013. Full Story

“your life is great”

Since: Aug 09

you poop in clean water

#1 Jun 17, 2012
On one big-ticket item, Romney and House Republicans already have parted company.

Both criticize Obama and Democrats for cutting Medicare by $500 billion over the next decade as part of the health care law.

But Romney's aides say he wants to restore the money to Medicare, while the budget that the Republicans pushed through the House would instead put the money toward deficit reduction.

.
.

that's very interesting, and if the supreme court rules against Obamacare, then Romney should publicly state his intention to restore that money to medicare.
it could secure (at least in part) the senior vote for him.
Anonymous

Franklin, PA

#2 Jun 17, 2012
The real issue is about funding the big money programs of the federal government.

First, the amount of the budget that goes into defense spending is ridiculous. Deficit reduction begins with spending reduction. Why does this country need to spend more money than the next 10 or more countries combined?

The reality is that we'd have a better economy if we stop funding automated tech defense in favor of "boots on the ground" strategy. It's less popular. Ir requires us to solve more diplomatic problems diplomatically instead of treating the sky as our own domain but there you go. More people employed. More people getting a higher education.

Second, the big lie is about socialized medicine. We rank #37 in the world for our healthcare system according to the World Health Organization. We pay into our system more than ANY country in the world.

DENIAL!!!!! PURE, LUNATIC DENIAL!!

There is no reason why we can't nationalize our healthcare system to provide minimum quality medicine, eliminate layers of unneeded middlemen, and collectively negotiate with the private sector for competitive pricing on pharmaceuticals and other healthcare tools. There's no reason why the private sector can't provide treatments not supported by a nationalized system.

The current system of making insurance compulsory does nothing but postpone the problem onto the backs of young people who statistically don't need the insurance and who don't really have the money anyway. They are getting paid disproportionally low salaries ANYWAY, because the disproportionally large older population wants control of their retirement plans.

Animals fighting for table scraps.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories - Health Care Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Durbin, Oberweis clash on immigration, health c... 22 hr spud 3
Was the U.S. health care system prepared to han... Oct 19 Gem 1
Blame Game Feds rile health care workers with E... Oct 18 CorruptedMedia 1
Family identifies health care worker infected w... Oct 15 lise2468 1
Liberian Health-Care Workers Threaten to Strike Oct 13 well 3
Texas Health-Care Worker Tests Positive for Ebola Oct 13 Enough 5
Rising Health-Care Costs Promote Income Inequality Oct 12 Gary 1

People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE