Romney Speaks of Values, Gay Marriage at Christian College

ROMEney speaking values lies , he will turn 180 once at the helm Of high office -value is to Kowtow what on US Coinage - In GOD WE TRUST" ---> Kowtow to Money! He panders to 1%! he can Fool the many but not few! WBHAHAHAHHAHAaaaaaa

imaginaryfriend wrote:

<quoted text> THIS IS A SECULAR NATION, MORON!!!!! The first amendment makes that very CLEAR!!! Get yourself an education!

Want an education? The First Amendment was designed to restrict the Federal Government not the State. The States were free to be as secular on nonsecular as they chose, and many chose the latter. Numerous States required their public officials to be of a certain religion to hold public office. These laws were just fine with the drafters of the Constitution. It wasn't until the 1960's that this changed, when the SCOTUS decided they knew better than the very men who drafted the document as to the meaning of the 1st Amendment.

The only thing the founders were concerned with was the creation of a national religion, like the Church of England, they were not interested in removing religion from the country. Hell, they used the bible in school.

Some people say there was a gang with Romney to bully Lauber and then there was assault.

How do you know and what makes you think like that, because you were not there?

Then check with those guys in high school days linked to Romney to see if it was true.

But whatever you do, you just can't find out because even for those people -- it was too long time ago whether they could have witnessed if it did happen, and had such memory , or was there such the happening?

So you fabricators have a lot of problems by making up the story.

Mormons sometimes feel people should have a clean look by volunteering to get some people's haircut, and if that was the case for Romney and Lauber, what is the big fuss?

Lauber might have liked it and his family complained others by fabricating story for making trouble.

The only truth can only come from Lauber, but it is not possible since he already passed away.

Have any people thought about that there were not any gay bully, gang grouping and assault?

Can those who say so, tell and provide facts and evidence , including Lauber's associates and teachers in high school?

If you baloney people cannot come up with a single valid point to prove anything you say by fabricating , how should the public handle and deal about you?

Then you are just the bitter and sour mouth by talkng with your foot or knee joint as if it is your head or mouth, because you are queer AND MENTALLY UNSTABLE.

You sour losers had better go to eat some sour burritos and then ask 'DIRTY HARRY' and he will tell you, "MAKE MY DAY."

OregonSUX wrote:

We should have impeached AWOLer Bumbya Bush.

Bush was re-elected.

The 0rganizer will be tossed on the trash heap of history with jimmy carter come November.

OregonSUXTBU

Latter Day Taints wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey crazy rube, that had nothing to do with my post, nor could you even provide a context for posting it.
This isn't about Warren. It's about Romney's bigotry and racist Tea Baggers' lies about Obama and the fact that fundie xstains at Liberty Baptist University [sic] think the earth is under 10000 years old.

Denial is a river in Egypt.

Liberals lied, America died.

mjjcpa wrote:

<quoted text>
Is denial a river in Egypt?

No. It's the state you're constantly in here on Topix.:)

mjjcpa wrote:

<quoted text>
Denial is a river in Egypt.
Liberals lied, America died.

The Nile is a river in Egypt.

Denial is the state in which you and other right wingers live.

America is alive, but won't be for long if Republicans take control.

You are the one who lies.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Want an education? The First Amendment was designed to restrict the Federal Government not the State. The States were free to be as secular on nonsecular as they chose, and many chose the latter. Numerous States required their public officials to be of a certain religion to hold public office. These laws were just fine with the drafters of the Constitution. It wasn't until the 1960's that this changed, when the SCOTUS decided they knew better than the very men who drafted the document as to the meaning of the 1st Amendment.
The only thing the founders were concerned with was the creation of a national religion, like the Church of England, they were not interested in removing religion from the country. Hell, they used the bible in school.

Article VI, paragraph 3 of the COnstitution:

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

I'm not denying that there have been INFORMAL religious requirements for holding office during the long and often bigoted history of this nation, but if you're interpreting the Constitution honestly, you have to admit that NO RELIGIOUS TEST SHALL EVER BE REQUIRED.

Those words are quite plain, much plainer even than your precious 2nd Amendment.

FWIW

akpilot wrote:

Want an education? The First Amendment was designed to restrict the Federal Government not the State.

Why is it that you are incapable of understanding the difference between the constitution as "designed" and its current applicability after 200+ years of jurisprudence.

You you heard of the Incorporation of the Bill of Rights? Go educate yourself. As it stands now, the 1st amendment absolutely applies to the states.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
The First Amendment was designed to restrict the Federal Government not the State. The States were free to be as secular on nonsecular as they chose....the founders were concerned with was the creation of a national religion, like the Church of England, they were not interested in removing religion from the country.

You ignorant, unhinged freeek, no one's removing religion from the country.

You xstain fundie bigots don't get to your confused version of Christianity treated any better than any other religion or a lack of religion in governmental contexts.

You're free to have you're lying, bigoted houses of worship of hate.

BTW, you still haven't acknowledged you lied about the bin Laden raid being Obama's call...against the odds. You lied about R. scum in Congress blocking, by law, Obama from shutting Gitmo. All you do is lie, you stupid racist.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
With a post count of 75 a day,

Get your own forum, donglicker, and you can make your own rules.

Pretend you wear the pants in your family.

mjjcpa wrote:

<quoted text>
Denial is a river in Egypt.

It isn't.

Help your mommy work on your cliches, Lips.

JBH wrote:

Some people say

Candian spam.

Some people say people should at least post somewhere close to topic, putting aside no one cares what a Canadian has to say about US elections.

Like other Mormons, Romney believes that God lives on a distant planet, and that the New Testament is not true, because it does not mention Jesus and Satan are brothers...G

akpilot wrote:

The States were free to be as secular on nonsecular as they chose, and many chose the latter..

What a profoundly stupid thing to say.

If Mitt Romney gets elected, Americans will be required by federal law to let Mormon missionaries into their home; what's more, if you offer a Coke to the Mormons you will be put in jail. You will be required to listen to any Mormon missionary that comes to your house, and wear secret underwear in the Army. Did you know Ann Romney wears secret underwear too? What do these people have to hide, anyway? First secret underwear,next what??? I hate and fear Mormons, they are just too different from us, too strange. Why do we let them get married to each other, that is the problem, I am opposed to Mormon marriage. Plus, Mitt speaks French, you know what that means, don't you?

Mormons sometimes feel people should have a clean look by volunteering to get some people's haircut, and if that was the case for Romney and Lauber, what is the big fuss?
Too bad Lauber did not sodomize Romney...i bet he did, and that's why Romney wears his hair the way he does now... everyone I know sex Romney is way gay, and that he gave his wife AIDS,not the MS she pretends to have...

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
What a profoundly stupid thing to say.

What a stupidly profound thing to say...

Mor Man wrote:

Like other Mormons, Romney believes that God lives on a distant planet, and that the New Testament is not true, because it does not mention Jesus and Satan are brothers...G

Too scary for words. Do Mormons deny any of this or do they simply avoid discussing it?

Loonatick wrote:

Mormons sometimes feel people should have a clean look by volunteering to get some people's haircut, and if that was the case for Romney and Lauber, what is the big fuss?
Too bad Lauber did not sodomize Romney...i bet he did, and that's why Romney wears his hair the way he does now... everyone I know sex Romney is way gay, and that he gave his wife AIDS,not the MS she pretends to have...

And the Muslim Obama has Muslim homeboys who love flying large airplanes into tall buildings filled with thousands of innocent, unsuspecting Americans..Speaking of AIDS, Obama should go get tested for having sweaty man sex in the back of a limo with Larry Sinclair and having sex with Moochelle the tranny!